re: Liberals/Statists are getting the Bundy situation completely wrong

Posted by WildTchoupitoulas

Member since Jan 2010

43998 posts

Posted on 4/22/14 at 3:00 pm to cwill

quote:
hitching your cart to Bundy is a loser

I disagree, why do you think it's a loser?

quote:
Supporting the overreaction of the gov is a loser.

Assuming supporting Bundy is a loser, why would you consider the government response an "overreaction"?

I guess I'll take the position that Bundy may, in fact, have a valid point.

AND

If you think he doesn't, you shouldn't have a problem with the fed's reaction to his invalid position.

Posted by goldennugget

Hating Masks

Member since Jul 2013

24514 posts

Posted on 4/22/14 at 3:04 pm to SpidermanTUba

quote:
If the tax cheat files a notice with the local sheriff declaring there will be a war if the government attempts to collect, and if the tax cheat has at his disposal an armed militia numbering in the hundreds - then yes, I think that's reasonable.

The armed militias didn't even show up until well after the 200 armed agents had already shown up

But your opinion means nothing, to you the government is an almightly all powerful entity that can do no wrong. It is even more perfect than Jesus Christ himself.

Posted by CptBengal

BR Baby

Member since Dec 2007

71661 posts

Posted on 4/22/14 at 3:15 pm to cwill

quote:
Same thing with the TX rancher on the Red River - completely misrepresented by whatever fringe media Cptretard linked to.

yeah yeah, its on the top of drudge this morning. Must be insane!

BTW, your hack writing isnt featured on the rant anymore? Why not, working on your next flop of a book?

Posted by cwill

Member since Jan 2005

54752 posts

Posted on 4/22/14 at 3:46 pm to CptBengal

quote:
yeah yeah, its on the top of drudge this morning. Must be insane!

I don't care where it's posted it was completely misrepresented in the thread you started.

quote:
BTW, your hack writing isnt featured on the rant anymore? Why not, working on your next flop of a book?

Have absolutely no idea what you're talking about...have you completely left reality behind?

Posted by CptBengal

BR Baby

Member since Dec 2007

71661 posts

Posted on 4/22/14 at 3:54 pm to cwill

quote:
I don't care where it's posted it was completely misrepresented in the thread you started.

I posted an article..I didnt write the article...

quote:
have you completely left reality behind?

considering you now believe that posting an article is the same as being the author, it appears this describes you, not me.

So sorry, champ.

Posted by cwill

Member since Jan 2005

54752 posts

Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:18 pm to CptBengal

quote:
onsidering you now believe that posting an article is the same as being the author, it appears this describes you, not me.

Considering that you read it uncritically and proclaimed a rancher was having his land taken by the BLM when it was readily apparent from minimal research that it wasn't makes you the owner of the thread and a fellow disseminator of bullshite. Like most of your posts you shoot first and then run from the thread once exposed.

WTF was your reference to the rant and books?

Posted by CptBengal

BR Baby

Member since Dec 2007

71661 posts

Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:21 pm to cwill

quote:
proclaimed a rancher was having his land taken by the BLM

the BLM is claiming the land....please try and keep up.

quote:
was readily apparent from minimal research that it wasn't

the precedent being claimed had the BLM seize that land, and they are using that same precedent there. It seems you have trouble reading....maybe hooked on phonics, or one of your made up degrees could help?

quote:
run from the thread once exposed.

I'm still here talking about it....I actually have other interests than dealing with your sophomoric comments and lack of sources.

Posted by cwill

Member since Jan 2005

54752 posts

Posted on 4/22/14 at 5:22 pm to CptBengal

quote:
the BLM is claiming the land....please try and keep up.

The taking isn't the BLM's doing....you claimed the BLM was taking his land.

quote:
the precedent being claimed had the BLM seize that land, and they are using that same precedent there. It seems you have trouble reading....maybe hooked on phonics, or one of your made up degrees could help?

You have trouble making sense.

quote:
I'm still here talking about it....I actually have other interests than dealing with your sophomoric comments and lack of sources.

Go to your thread, imbecile, for all the info you need to see that your premise was false. Other interests = conspiracy theories?

This post was edited on 4/22/14 at 5:23 pm

Posted by constant cough

Lafayette

Member since Jun 2007

44788 posts

Posted on 4/22/14 at 5:25 pm to goldennugget

The fact that he's on "government land" and not paying taxes on it just makes him a hero to me.

Posted by ShortyRob

Member since Oct 2008

82116 posts

Posted on 4/22/14 at 5:32 pm to WildTchoupitoulas

quote:
It's about whatever the land owner wants it to be about.

That's your ONLY criteria for evaluating government behavior? If they own the shite? Not if their reasons for using that ownership to remove certain residents is corrupt or not. Just ownership?

Good f'n lord. Please tell me I'm misunderstanding your point.