Started By
Message

re: Bundy/BLM: Sheriff: "Feds Strategizing for Raid"

Posted on 4/15/14 at 8:50 am to
Posted by DosManos
Member since Oct 2013
3552 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 8:50 am to
quote:

Harry Reid is allegedly the world's foremost pederast


Is this a legit allegation? I know he looks like one and I wouldn't put it past him, but are there actual rumors of him being a pederast?
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54202 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 8:53 am to
quote:

Don't even...


Don't what. Either cause is about what they consider an injustice by the government. In the civil rights case their persistence paid off for what they were marching for. You're saying Bundy doesn't have the same right? Bundy's ordeal might fizzle out to be nothing but he has as much right to show his disapproval for what he thinks is an injustice.

Time will tell if Bundy's actions have been all for naught or if just maybe things get changed in the way the BLM defines itself.
Posted by dante
Kingwood, TX
Member since Mar 2006
10669 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 8:54 am to
quote:

pederast?
Is that the same thing as pedophile?
This post was edited on 4/15/14 at 8:55 am
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80087 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 8:56 am to
quote:

are there actual rumors of him being a pederast?


I think the running joke is, he hasn't proven that he isn't, so maybe he is...


Posted by DosManos
Member since Oct 2013
3552 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 8:57 am to
quote:

I think the running joke is, he hasn't proven that he isn't, so maybe he is...



Right- that's some Harry Reid logic right there. Taste of his own medicine.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80087 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 8:59 am to
quote:

Right- that's some Harry Reid logic right there. Taste of his own medicine.


Thats where it comes from... Was it Romney that he pulled similar shite on? Don't remember
Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
11129 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:01 am to
quote:

Bring it on. I don't like the idea of my government being intimidated by a ragtag gang of survivalists and other malcontents.


In 1776, you'd be called a Tory.
Posted by DosManos
Member since Oct 2013
3552 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:01 am to
quote:

Thats where it comes from... Was it Romney that he pulled similar shite on? Don't remember



Yeah. Remember when he called Romney out for not paying taxes? He said something like the onus was on Romney to prove he didn't not pay taxes or some horse shite like that.
Posted by son of arlo
State of Innocence
Member since Sep 2013
4577 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:03 am to
quote:

Was it Romney that he pulled similar shite on? Don't remember


He accused Romney of not paying any taxes. When Romney didn't release all his tax returns, it "proved" Romney didn't pay taxes.

Some people still want to know how Reid found out Romney hadn't paid any taxes. Surely there was no collusion between the IRS and Harry Reid. Right?
Posted by DosManos
Member since Oct 2013
3552 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:05 am to
quote:

Some people still want to know how Reid found out Romney hadn't paid any taxes.


Yeah but Romney did pay his taxes.
Posted by TigerTatorTots
The Safeshore
Member since Jul 2009
80750 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:05 am to
quote:

If you are for civil rights how can you not be for rancher's rights?

Because in the mind of the libs, Civil Rights is/was the PROGRESSIVE thing to do. Who the hell cares are the white man rancher?


I hate liberal think
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44046 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:05 am to
quote:

Don't what. Either cause is about what they consider an injustice by the government. In the civil rights case their persistence paid off for what they were marching for. You're saying Bundy doesn't have the same right? Bundy's ordeal might fizzle out to be nothing but he has as much right to show his disapproval for what he thinks is an injustice. Time will tell if Bundy's actions have been all for naught or if just maybe things get changed in the way the BLM defines itself.

One group willingly being led to incarceration for what they believe in versus another threatening violence is not comparable.

quote:

Time will tell if Bundy's actions have been all for naught or if just maybe things get changed in the way the BLM defines itself.


I bet you're against amnesty for illegal immigrants because you believe it would be unfair to all of those immigrants who did it the right way. But what about all of those homesteaders who did it the right way and paid their taxes/fees for over a hundred years? Should they too just threaten the government with violence to avoid paying what they agreed to in the first place?

The fact is that Bundy is WRONG. It's not his land, it never was his land, and he doesn't even claim it to be his land. How can this be about his property rights?

The US gov't paid for the land through war with Mexico, Nevada doesn't even claim the land, and doesn't recognize Bundy's claim. How can this be about State's Rights?

It's just an absurdity that people are using as an excuse to get all militant over other frustrations they are having with the government.

They should petition the government with their grievances as the law allows. If they want to break the law, fine, but accept the penalty - just like the Civil Rights activists did. If enough people agree with them, they will affect change.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57061 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:06 am to
quote:

Thats where it comes from... Was it Romney that he pulled similar shite on? Don't remember
Ya. Ina sickening use of the Senate floor for campaign activities... Reid claimed that he had a source (he wouldn't reveal) that said Romney didn't pay any taxes for a decade. And it was up to Romney to prove his innocence.

So... There is a source (that won't be revealed) that has evidence Reid molests young boys. It's up to Reid, to prove the allegations are untrue. He hasn't, so, we have no reason to believe he doesn't molest pre-pubescent boys.
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
38911 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:06 am to
If the rancher was black, layabout would be on the other side.

That's just how that racist rolls.
Posted by son of arlo
State of Innocence
Member since Sep 2013
4577 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:07 am to
quote:

Reid claimed that he had a source (he wouldn't reveal)


Maybe it was the rogue Cincinnati office?
Posted by shawnlsu
Member since Nov 2011
23682 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:11 am to
quote:

Are you seriously comparing the non-violent civil disobedience of the Civil Rights movement

wow, does the sand get cooler the further you stick your head in it?
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44046 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:16 am to
quote:

wow, does the sand get cooler the further you stick your head in it?

You have no idea.

I grew up around Civil Rights activists who went to jail for their beliefs, who were beaten by the police, but refused to turn to violence.

The fact is that BUNDY HAS NO CLAIM.
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:19 am to
Everyone else did a good job of explaining it. We don't know whether or not Harry Reid has operated an international ring of pederasts for several decades, but since he's not been forthcoming with proof to the contrary, by his own logic, he must be a child molester. Now, no one has proof of this, but Reid himself is the father of the school of logic that says no evidence at all = convincing proof.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54202 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:21 am to
quote:

WildTchoupitoulas


You're arguing reasons for the protests. I'm arguing for the reason to protest. Bundy might be wrong as rain but there were a lot of folks that thought the civil rights people were also wrong but they believed in their purpose. Look what it got them. I'm willing to give the man the chance to see if history proves him right or wrong.

Bundy doesn't have that same right whether he be right or wrong?

This from one of your other posts:

quote:

I see nothing wrong with people who disagree with our right to keep and bear arms voicing their opinion. I may disagree with them, but it's their right to pursue the change they desire.



You make my point exactly.
This post was edited on 4/15/14 at 9:25 am
Posted by Old Hellen Yeller
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
9414 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:23 am to
Will be watching this one closely. Hopefully Bundy wins. I'll not pay taxes fees or fines next year and dare them to come get me.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram