- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:56 pm to Samso
quote:It was 9/11.
But hindsight is 20/20
And there it is
Our Ambassador was attending a poorly secured Consulate in an area previously abandoned by most Western Diplomats d/t safety concerns. Anything other than 0/0 foresight would have rendered the awful outcome predictable.
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:57 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
It was 9/11.
Our Ambassador was attending a poorly secured Consulate in an area previously abandoned by most Western Diplomats d/t safety concerns. Anything other than 0/0 foresight would have rendered the awful outcome predictable.
This.
Posted on 4/15/14 at 11:00 pm to Rex
quote:
quote:
That was the info the CIA gave them.
Same excuse the Bush admin used for WMDs!
Rex pissed himself when he read this. He went apeshit over Bush accepting the CIA's WMD reason for Iraq. The same one that both houses of congress accepted as a reason to invade Iraq.
But it's ok now to stand by any CIA report for this president.
Double standard.
Posted on 4/16/14 at 7:13 am to MississippiLSUfan
quote:Problem is, it wasn't anywhere near the same standard.
That was the info the CIA gave them.
Same excuse the Bush admin used for WMDs!
Rex pissed himself when he read this. He went apeshit over Bush accepting the CIA's WMD reason
The CIA had actual evidence for WMDs in the Iraq scenario. They produced it. It was evidence solid enough to convince not just Bush, but the US Congress with near unanimity, along with the Brits, etc.
In the case of the Benghazi attacks, there was no evidence whatsoever of a protest or demonstration preceding the Benghazi attack. NONE!
The streets were dead quiet in the prelude.
That was known real time.
The attacks were coordinated.
That was known real time.
There was no protest or demonstration extending down the street from Consulate to CIA Annex. There was a coordinated re-formation at the annex . . . complete with mortar positions!
That was known real time.
There were no sign wielding members of the entourage at either location, not one single sign, no press crews, no people parading in the street, no evidence of demonstrations, none at all.
There was no protest, and
that FACT was known real time.
This post was edited on 4/16/14 at 7:16 am
Posted on 4/16/14 at 7:33 am to NC_Tigah
Any follow up on the weapons cache they were sitting on being confiscated by the terrorists?
Posted on 4/16/14 at 7:36 am to theunknownknight
quote:Are you eff'ing kidding?
Any follow up on the weapons cache they were sitting on being confiscated by the terrorists?
The FBI spent more time in Scott Broadwell's house assessing Paula Broadwell's sexual habits than it did in Benghazi.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News