Started By
Message

re: Bill to ban dogs in truck beds passes out of committee

Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:48 am to
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:48 am to
quote:

what do you think the intent for this law is then?


To make the women vote for the author next time he's on a ticket.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83516 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:49 am to
We get it. You hate women.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:51 am to
Emotional people piss me off

Put that in your sig quote and suck it.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83516 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:51 am to
You seem pretty emotional about this...
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:53 am to
I posted that hoping somebody would make it a sig quote
Posted by pointdog33
Member since Jan 2012
2765 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:56 am to
I'd be willing to bet that veterinarians have a large hand in contacting the legislator and promoting this policy not housewives. Pretty sure the everyday housewife doesn't give a shite about dogs in the back of trucks. They got other stuff to do.
Posted by JSM
Member since May 2013
647 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 10:05 am to
May as well add amendment requiring covered bed or
Iots of sunscreen in summer . Some do gooder started chewin bro -in- law out about cruelty to dog in back in sun on hot summer day till he told him to frick off.
Posted by ComicTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2005
992 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 12:00 pm to
Yes, they do. Like driving around the biggest SUV they can while talking/texting other women on the cell phone all the damn time. THIS is an actual big threat to our safety but gotta stop all that drunk driving yall!!!!!!!
Posted by DonChowder
Sonoma County
Member since Dec 2012
9249 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 12:23 pm to
Damn...I see a lot of fighting going on in here.


Has cootkilla weighed in on this subject yet?
Posted by Pepperidge
Slidell
Member since Apr 2011
4311 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

My point was that eating chicken is a choice that I can make. If I feel it is unsafe, I can choose to not eat chicken.

I cannot choose who gets in front of me while driving on the highway.


You could also choose not to drive...
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166121 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 1:40 pm to
does this apply to toddlers?
Posted by dawg23
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Jul 2011
5065 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

Still stupid and a waste of time. Stupid arse emotional legislation

Agree.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

Has cootkilla weighed in on this subject yet?


He texted me and suggest that all dogs be required to ride on catapults in the bed that are automatically activated every time there is an 18 wheeler approaching in the opposite lane.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram