At 400,000 Years, Oldest Human DNA Yet Found Raises New Mysteries - Page 4 - TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
Manky
LSU Fan
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2013
1145 posts

re: At 400,000 Years, Oldest Human DNA Yet Found Raises New Mysteries


quote:

The 'Out of Africa' theory is getting weaker with each new discovery.


Out of Africa was "a" migration but not "the" migration as previously thought.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
Gladius Veritas
Wisconsin Fan
North Little Rock, Arkansas
Member since May 2012
9591 posts

re: At 400,000 Years, Oldest Human DNA Yet Found Raises New Mysteries


quote:

Seems like all these fancy scientist don't know shite.


Scientists never claim to know everything. The fact that science is open to new evidence and is constantly changing to represent the newest evidence isn't some win for the religious who denounce science, but a win for science itself. Sorry you're stuck in 1850






Back to top
League Champs
Bayou Self
Member since Oct 2012
3115 posts

re: At 400,000 Years, Oldest Human DNA Yet Found Raises New Mysteries


quote:

Other than confirming that we don't have much of a fossil or DNA record I don't think it does that much to change the fundamental nature of evolution or where the first humans came from.

No, it changes it big time. With this find, theories are emerging to suggest that human DNA dates back 1.8 million years.
quote:

Beth Shapiro, an expert on ancient DNA at the University of California, Santa Cruz, favors an even more radical possibility: that the humans of Sima de los Huesos belong to yet another branch of humans. They might have been a species called Homo erectus, which originated about 1.8 million years ago

Confuses the hell out of evolution at this point. You can make a case for micro, but the window just got closed on everything but punctuated equilibrium (which is heavily criticised even by evolutionists).
quote:

The new finding is hard to reconcile with the picture of human evolution that has been emerging based on fossils and ancient DNA

quote:

“It’s extremely hard to make sense of,” Dr. Meyer said. “We still are a bit lost here.”

You just lost 1.7 million years in the evolutionary chain. Now the gaps in the fossil record became undeniable

Everything you learned in science class was not fact. Just a guess. Dont worry, they'll somehow guess themselves into making this work



Until the next discovery comes along






Back to top
lsutothetop
Columbia Fan
TigerDroppings Elite
Member since Jul 2008
10590 posts
 Online 

re: At 400,000 Years, Oldest Human DNA Yet Found Raises New Mysteries


You're jumping the gun big time. The window isn't "closed" on bigger-picture evolution over time. Our current picture of it is out, obviously, but declaring evolution beyond a few generations "out the window" is nonsense.

And "microevolution" (which isn't a particularly useful term in the first place) is still ironclad, this does nothing to demote it to "make a case" status. We've observed single-generation and multi-generation (*to an extent) evolution with smaller organisms plenty of times over the past century. How do you think vaccine-resistant staph came to be? Why do you think we can't cure the common cold? None of that is affected by this finding.

This definitely torpedoes our current construction of the evolution of mankind from other animals, but declaring evolution dead betrays either ignorance or willful misrepresentation of the theory.






Back to top
FightinTigersDammit
Northwestern St. Fan
Farmerville LA
Member since Mar 2006
6379 posts

re: At 400,000 Years, Oldest Human DNA Yet Found Raises New Mysteries


quote:


Seems like all these fancy scientist don't know shite.




Scientists never claim to know everything. The fact that science is open to new evidence and is constantly changing to represent the newest evidence isn't some win for the religious who denounce science, but a win for science itself. Sorry you're stuck in 1850


There are scientists, however, who, having found the politically desired result they sought to find, declare the matter to be 'settled science'. Like Obamacare is 'settled law'. No new evidence needed or desired at that point.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
League Champs
Bayou Self
Member since Oct 2012
3115 posts

re: At 400,000 Years, Oldest Human DNA Yet Found Raises New Mysteries


quote:

This definitely torpedoes our current construction of the evolution of mankind from other animals, but declaring evolution dead betrays either ignorance or willful misrepresentation of the theory.

Wait, we went from australopithecus africanus to human in about 2 million years, but havent 'evolved' any in the last 1.8 million?

Aint buying it

For the Darwinian challenged, this chart would represent a major evolutionary cycle every 400,000 years. But we now have human DNA that is 400,000 years old, with no changes










Back to top
lsutothetop
Columbia Fan
TigerDroppings Elite
Member since Jul 2008
10590 posts
 Online 

re: At 400,000 Years, Oldest Human DNA Yet Found Raises New Mysteries


quote:

Wait, we went from australopithecus africanus to human in about 2 million years, but havent 'evolved' any in the last 1.8 million?

I don't even follow where your question is coming from because I didn't say anything about it.

quote:

For the Darwinian challenged, this chart would represent a major evolutionary cycle every 400,000 years. But we now have human DNA that is 400,000 years old, with no changes

You are aware that the specimen mentioned in the article is not an anatomically modern human, right It's a Denisovan, which is akin to a Neanderthal -- very close, but not quite, anatomically modern human.



With respect, you have not the slightest clue what you're talking about.






Back to top
Bayou
LSU Fan
Arizona Desert
Member since Feb 2005
24206 posts

re: At 400,000 Years, Oldest Human DNA Yet Found Raises New Mysteries


quote:

Let's jjust talk about this scientific finding and leave religion out of it.

Yes, because we all know religion shapes your worldview and politics doesn't.
We're all chasing a worldview that we agree with. As long as we can eliminate religion from that equation it's easy.






Back to top
Bayou
LSU Fan
Arizona Desert
Member since Feb 2005
24206 posts

re: At 400,000 Years, Oldest Human DNA Yet Found Raises New Mysteries


Anyone have an answer as to how they dated this DNA? What method was used? Do you people care?





Back to top
  Replies (0)
germandawg
Member since Sep 2012
2731 posts

re: At 400,000 Years, Oldest Human DNA Yet Found Raises New Mysteries


quote:

Sounds like the oldest human DNA is now Spain instead of Africa.


That is almost as bad if not worse...Spain is nearly as dysfunctional as Greece.....






Back to top
  Replies (0)
756
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2004
9539 posts

re: At 400,000 Years, Oldest Human DNA Yet Found Raises New Mysteries


Its also possible their dating methods are incorrect. Something many do not want to admit. The process of age dating is far more controversial than many will admit





Back to top
  Replies (0)
RCDfan1950
LSU Fan
United States
Member since Feb 2007
10820 posts

re: At 400,000 Years, Oldest Human DNA Yet Found Raises New Mysteries


quote:

I don't go to church anymore and really haven't for years. I do believe in a higher power. There is no way that things such as eye sight, nerve functions and a million other things evolved in a vacuum. It defies logic that something like the pancreas could just evolve knowing it's beta cells would need to release some substance called insulin to regulate blood sugar. You are retarded if you believe there is no inteligence behind all of this. What inteligence that is is up to you. Atheist are more idiotic than religious people.


If you read, Scoop, and enjoy Science and Religion...you might find Talbot's "The Holographic Universe" interesting.

The psychological benefits of Faith are profound, as such relates to the *real* world. Even more so by the day, a the inevitable synthesis between *Natural* Intelligence and Artificial Intelligence approaches. The Singularity approaches.

A person is a fool to think that neither Love (subjective reality choice)...or Evil (Evil, defined as the opposite of Love)...do not exist. The Spirit (things of) are every bit as *real* as the *real* world. And the probability that a loving God (the sum total of Consciousness, which is the essence of Energy and Matter) would not send a "Savior" in a mold that we can comprehend to guide us through Evil and an infinite universal maze...is simply...impossible.







Back to top
goatmilker
New Orleans Saints Fan
2014 drunkin Bobby award winner!
Member since Feb 2009
15667 posts
 Online 

re: At 400,000 Years, Oldest Human DNA Yet Found Raises New Mysteries


whoops


This post was edited on 12/5 at 10:09 am


Back to top
  Replies (0)
Drew Orleans
LSU Fan
Member since Mar 2010
18787 posts
 Online 

re: At 400,000 Years, Oldest Human DNA Yet Found Raises New Mysteries


Seems like they can't fine tune things to "know shit" unless there is a discovery made.

Dip shite.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
Powerman
LSU Fan
Corpus Christi, TX
Member since Jan 2004
120417 posts

re: At 400,000 Years, Oldest Human DNA Yet Found Raises New Mysteries


quote:

But what's that got to do with me and me wanting some guy to die?


It has to do with you being too dense to recognize an obvious joke.






Back to top
L.A.
New Orleans Saints Fan
Los Angeles
Member since Aug 2003
37473 posts
 Online 

re: At 400,000 Years, Oldest Human DNA Yet Found Raises New Mysteries


quote:

It has to do with you being too dense to recognize an obvious joke.
I know it's a joke. I just don't GET the joke. Comprende?

Powerman, seriously, I would pay you $100 to stay out of threads I start. You've become obnoxious.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
League Champs
Bayou Self
Member since Oct 2012
3115 posts

re: At 400,000 Years, Oldest Human DNA Yet Found Raises New Mysteries


quote:

You are aware that the specimen mentioned in the article is not an anatomically modern human, right It's a Denisovan, which is akin to a Neanderthal -- very close, but not quite, anatomically modern human.

I am fully aware, but previous theory maintained that a divergence time from primates of one million years ago, and the estimated average time of divergence between Denisovan and Neanderthal sequences is 640,000 years ago, and the time between both of these and the sequences of modern humans is 804,000 years ago.

But with this find, its impossible to go from primate to Denisovan to human within a believable time span. Also, pushing this find back 400,000 years in Spain disrupts the whole evolutionary migration patterns because Denisovans were theorized to be confined to Asia.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
roygu
Member since Jan 2004
8279 posts

re: At 400,000 Years, Oldest Human DNA Yet Found Raises New Mysteries


First Earth Age, mentioned in the Bible.





Back to top
RCDfan1950
LSU Fan
United States
Member since Feb 2007
10820 posts

re: At 400,000 Years, Oldest Human DNA Yet Found Raises New Mysteries


quote:

First Earth Age, mentioned in the Bible.


Link?

Seriously, R...I'd like to peruse that Scripture, if you'd be so kind.







Back to top
Wishnitwas1998
Tennessee Fan
Walls, Ms
Member since Oct 2010
15353 posts

re: At 400,000 Years, Oldest Human DNA Yet Found Raises New Mysteries


I'm not exactly sure what he's talking about and can't give a scripture other than the obvious somewhere in Genesis but maybe he means before the flood of Noah?


This post was edited on 12/5 at 12:05 pm


Back to top
  Replies (0)


Back to top