- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Looking to the Future: Nick Foles, should we?
Posted on 10/18/13 at 6:47 pm to Suntiger
Posted on 10/18/13 at 6:47 pm to Suntiger
I just think its too early. baring injury, I think brees can last another 5 years.
Do we really want to bring in a ~23 year old QB that will have to sit that long before he gets to start his first game?
Do we really want to bring in a ~23 year old QB that will have to sit that long before he gets to start his first game?
1
Posted on 10/18/13 at 7:14 pm to htran90
I do like the Murray talk.
and I also think a 2nd or a 3rd on a QB is a totally plausible strategy.
and I also think a 2nd or a 3rd on a QB is a totally plausible strategy.
Posted on 10/18/13 at 8:20 pm to WestlakeTiger
Mettenberger?
Posted on 10/18/13 at 8:48 pm to Suntiger
Doubt they seriously consider drafting a QB in the 1-3 rounds for another two or three years. I also wonder if Payton calls it quits when Brees is done.
Posted on 10/18/13 at 9:02 pm to Bayou
quote:
Mettenberger?
If he develops a pocket presence, then who knows?
Posted on 10/18/13 at 10:34 pm to Hoodoo Man
quote:
Did all of you forget about RG4?
Nick Montana
This post was edited on 10/18/13 at 10:36 pm
Posted on 10/18/13 at 10:35 pm to Bayou
Metts going #1 brah.
Posted on 10/18/13 at 10:51 pm to 4thandinches
quote:
Jameis Winston.....?
I agree..
Jameis Winston should be available for the Saints in 2015...
Posted on 10/18/13 at 10:59 pm to 4thandinches
I don't think it's so much that Griffin couldn't beat out McCown as it was Payton preferring to have a veteran back up opposed to a rookie.
Posted on 10/19/13 at 2:01 am to Suntiger
Johnny Football anyone?
Posted on 10/19/13 at 4:35 am to tigersint
quote:
Johnny Football anyone?
no
Posted on 10/19/13 at 5:09 am to 4thandinches
...
Just draft a QB that falls a bit in a couple of years.
Just draft a QB that falls a bit in a couple of years.
Posted on 10/19/13 at 5:48 am to LasVegasBandit
quote:
Metts going #1 brah
he is quickly climbing the draft boards, and if he carves up the rest of the schedule he will be a top 5 player IMO
Posted on 10/19/13 at 10:19 am to 4thandinches
Aaron Murray would be my choice and let him sit for 4 years and learn from Brees.
Posted on 10/19/13 at 11:12 am to Slapouttiger
quote:
Aaron Murray would be my choice and let him sit for 4 years and learn from Brees.
So take some other picks to trade up in the 1st Rd for a guy on the bench for 4 years? He won't be getting much experience. Saints QBs other than Brees number of pass attempts the past 4 years- 9 in the past 3 years. Brunnell got 30 in the game Brees sat down for in 2009.
The successor to Breesus is prolly still in high school.
Posted on 10/19/13 at 11:25 am to 4thandinches
quote:
Brees is 34, we can say he has about 3 (or 4 more years
so Tom Brady is done too then?
Posted on 10/19/13 at 11:28 am to Suntiger
quote:
I'd like to spend a 2nd or third rounder on one and develop him behind Brees.
I'd like to spend a 2nd or 3rd rounder trying to win a super bowl right now and protecting Brees so he can play to at least 40
Posted on 10/19/13 at 12:06 pm to TigerBait1127
The first round pick next year should be O line.
Posted on 10/19/13 at 7:02 pm to LSUFanNTX
It's way too early to even think about this. Who thinks about the QB of the future when their team is presently a Super Bowl contender with a QB that is still breaking records? The days of drafting guys to groom for 4 years are over. QBs are coming out of college ready to play day one. By making a guy sit for that long is just doing a disservice to the player and the organization that drafted him.
Edit: Also, it makes it even dumber when you consider the guy will be at the end of his rookie deal before he even starts a game. Who wants to sign a guy long term before he starts a game?
Edit: Also, it makes it even dumber when you consider the guy will be at the end of his rookie deal before he even starts a game. Who wants to sign a guy long term before he starts a game?
This post was edited on 10/19/13 at 7:04 pm
Posted on 10/19/13 at 8:53 pm to 4thandinches
I know this isn't the place or time, but for frick's sake. It's "in light of" and not "in lieu of." frick. Who dat.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News