Started By
Message

re: Why Vegas thinks TCU has a good shot vs LSU

Posted on 8/22/13 at 1:46 pm to
Posted by PurpleAndGold86
Member since Jun 2012
11036 posts
Posted on 8/22/13 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

It seems to me that there are many games where LSU does not cover the spread and likewise LSU does not allow the opposing team to cover the spread.

You lost me with this

ETA: Unless you are only referring to "covering" as the favorite in a particular game and are saying that LSU does not allow opponents to cover when LSU is the dog in a game. I.e. Bama 2012?

If that's what you mean, then go back and take a look at 2011.
This post was edited on 8/22/13 at 1:48 pm
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64562 posts
Posted on 8/22/13 at 1:51 pm to
I do not bet on games, but there are many games where LSU does not win by the gaming margin. When LSU is picked to lose which lately has not been many times, the team that beats them does not cover the spread either. The opposition might win but gamblers lose. LSU wins and again gamblers using the Vegas spread lose. That is what I have noticed in recent years, say the last ten.
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64562 posts
Posted on 8/22/13 at 1:53 pm to
I am not saying it is for every case but a majority.
Posted by More beer please
Member since Feb 2010
45041 posts
Posted on 8/22/13 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

When LSU is picked to lose which lately has not been many times


link?
Posted by PurpleAndGold86
Member since Jun 2012
11036 posts
Posted on 8/22/13 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

The opposition might win but gamblers lose.


Not if you bet on the underdog which is pretty common among those that bet.

quote:

That is what I have noticed in recent years, say the last ten.


Well like I said, go back and take a look at 2011 because we covered the spread in pretty much every single game we played sans like 2.
Posted by lsuhunt555
Teakwood Village Breh
Member since Nov 2008
38404 posts
Posted on 8/22/13 at 1:54 pm to
Its articles like this that make me not read articles like this. Its the same logic as when people say "Bama lost 10 starters and will reload. LSU lost 10 starters and probably will take a step back this year due to lack of experience."

Why the frick can certain team reload and others cant when theyve been signing the same caliber of players?
Posted by goldennugget
Hating Masks
Member since Jul 2013
24514 posts
Posted on 8/22/13 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

LSU will be able to run the football at will against their DL which will be decimated without Fields. I also believe LSU will be able to throw the ball effectively against them with CC at the helm.


I remember Wisconsin saying the same thing
Posted by PurpleAndGold86
Member since Jun 2012
11036 posts
Posted on 8/22/13 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

I remember Wisconsin saying the same thing


Ok.
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
69996 posts
Posted on 8/22/13 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

I remember Wisconsin saying the same thing


Wisconsin had Cam Cameron running their offense? I must have missed that.
Posted by More beer please
Member since Feb 2010
45041 posts
Posted on 8/22/13 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

I remember Wisconsin saying the same thing


Good thing wisconsin doesnt play in the SEC. And TCU has only ever faced Vandy...once
Posted by PurpleAndGold86
Member since Jun 2012
11036 posts
Posted on 8/22/13 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

Why the frick can certain team reload and others cant when theyve been signing the same caliber of players?


Don't get too worked up. People will realize pretty quickly that this defense is full of star studded talent.
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
69996 posts
Posted on 8/22/13 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

Why the frick can certain team reload and others cant when theyve been signing the same caliber of players?


If the article implied that TCU has signed the same caliber of players that LSU has over recent years, the writer is dumber than I thought.
Posted by More beer please
Member since Feb 2010
45041 posts
Posted on 8/22/13 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

If the article implied that TCU has signed the same caliber of players that LSU has over recent years, the writer is dumber than I thought.


Sounds like Bleeding Purple
Posted by bigpapamac
Mobile, AL
Member since Oct 2007
22375 posts
Posted on 8/22/13 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

Why Vegas thinks TCU has a good shot vs LSU


Because people are betting on TCU Vegas doesn't predict outcomes, they don't think LSU will win by 3-4 points and they could care less. They're just trying to get equal action on both teams, and 3.5 is the number they've found to do it.
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18664 posts
Posted on 8/22/13 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

Why the frick can certain team reload and others cant when theyve been signing the same caliber of players?


Because they are back to back national champs with a coach everyone trusts in Saban.

We are coming off a bowl loss and people think Miles is aloof.

It is what it is.
Posted by PurpleAndGold86
Member since Jun 2012
11036 posts
Posted on 8/22/13 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

Because people are betting on TCU


No one is betting on TCU. On SportsBook the action is listed as 96% LSU and 4% TCU.

quote:

They're just trying to get equal action on both teams


Then they need to raise the spread to about 10.
Posted by lsuhunt555
Teakwood Village Breh
Member since Nov 2008
38404 posts
Posted on 8/22/13 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

Don't get too worked up. People will realize pretty quickly that this defense is full of star studded talent.



It just irks me how stupid people are. Its like they believe Bama is signing 3 year NFL players and everyone else is signing D3 level players.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
58514 posts
Posted on 8/22/13 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

Seems like our youth is a weakness and theirs is a strength


Makes sense to me.
Posted by geauxranger54
Hoover, Alabama
Member since Feb 2012
1158 posts
Posted on 8/22/13 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

Because people are betting on TCU Vegas doesn't predict outcomes, they don't think LSU will win by 3-4 points and they could care less. They're just trying to get equal action on both teams, and 3.5 is the number they've found to do it


Is that really how that works?
Posted by goldennugget
Hating Masks
Member since Jul 2013
24514 posts
Posted on 8/22/13 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

No one is betting on TCU. On SportsBook the action is listed as 96% LSU and 4% TCU.


Lines don't move based on public action. They move based on sharp action.

This means the public is pounding LSU(not a surprise) but the sharp/smart/high roller money is coming in on TCU to keep the line around 3.5-4.5.

If a bunch of sharps/wise guys come in and pound the LSU line it will move.

It could also be a trap line, with books themselves gambling on a TCU cover which would be a giant score for the books. A big risk, but high return.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram