- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pelicans Talk FF League (Formerly Hornets Talk) Year 2
Posted on 9/12/13 at 10:56 pm to MrWiseGuy
Posted on 9/12/13 at 10:56 pm to MrWiseGuy
Well Fear understood it as the opposite. So neither person gets screwed, we have 2 options.
1- Agree to the trade and let the standard wait period run its course
2- Decide not to do the trade
1- Agree to the trade and let the standard wait period run its course
2- Decide not to do the trade
1
Posted on 9/12/13 at 10:58 pm to TigerTatorTots
The problem with option 1 is I will lose the player I would have started instead
Posted on 9/12/13 at 11:00 pm to MrWiseGuy
You may, you may not. No one knows if the trade will be processed in 3 calendar days (accepted thrusday/processed Sunday) or 3 full days (accepted thursday/processed Monday)
Posted on 9/12/13 at 11:02 pm to MrWiseGuy
quote:wait so your intention was to trade me Richardson but still use him sunday?
MrWiseGuy
Posted on 9/12/13 at 11:04 pm to Fearthehat0307
That is what it appears
ETA: You 2 can decide if you want to play Russian Fantasy Roulette and let the wait period decide your fate, or if you want to omit the trade
ETA: You 2 can decide if you want to play Russian Fantasy Roulette and let the wait period decide your fate, or if you want to omit the trade
This post was edited on 9/12/13 at 11:06 pm
Posted on 9/12/13 at 11:08 pm to TigerTatorTots
From an outsiders point of view, that seems like the most fair way of doing it.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 11:10 pm to Fearthehat0307
quote:
wait so your intention was to trade me Richardson but still use him sunday?
No.
My intention was to play a starting RB in my flex this week.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 11:11 pm to dj30
Good, I wish more league members would comment. I want to get other opinions of the fairness
Posted on 9/12/13 at 11:14 pm to Fearthehat0307
quote:
wait so your intention was to trade me Richardson but still use him sunday?
ya, i don't get this.
TTT has processed trades pretty quickly for the past two seasons...I would have assumed that I would get the player for that Sunday.
Retrospectively wanting Powell in there looks fishy (not saying that's MWG's intent)...He should have been inserted before kickoff
This post was edited on 9/12/13 at 11:16 pm
Posted on 9/12/13 at 11:16 pm to drake20
How is it fishy?
I don't want the trade to happen anymore since I lose two starting running backs that I could have started for this week.
I don't want the trade to happen anymore since I lose two starting running backs that I could have started for this week.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 11:17 pm to MrWiseGuy
you should have got clarification or inserted Powell...I don't understand assuming that the trade wouldn't go through as the only possibility...seems like that's the least likely outcome for this league
Posted on 9/12/13 at 11:18 pm to MrWiseGuy
These damn Thursday games really screws up trading. That is why I sent out that league e-mail. Communication after trades is mandatory now or you will be relegated to the 3 day wait period.
quote:
From now going forward, every agreed upon trade must have some sort of communication in writing (thread or email to me) stating both party's intentions for when the trade should be processed. We ran into an issue tonight because of this.
Know that there is a standard 3 day process time for trades to go through. I am not sure if that is 3 days (accepted Thursday, processed Sunday) or 3 full days (accepted Thursday, processed Monday).
Every trade where no communication is made alerting me to your intentions will be defaulted to the standard 3 days. You will have to risk whether that is 3 calendar days or full days until we find out for sure. If you both intend for the trade to be processed prior to a Thursday game, and it affects roster spots (the person you traded leaves an open spot in your lineup in which you would insert someone playing in the Thursday night game), you must tell me who you want in your line prior to Thursday night kickoff.
Lets try to avoid another SNAFU that occurred tonight. These Thrusday night games really throw a wrench into trading. Rosters ARE NOT locked after games start on Thursday, only Sunday.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 11:19 pm to drake20
Because it was 7:30 and the trade hadnt processed.
Again, I'm taking the stance to nullify the deal. I don't see how you can call me fishy.
I lose TWO starting running backs in a 12-team league - I can't play them at all, if the trade is processed after kickoff of the Pats - Jets game.
Again, I'm taking the stance to nullify the deal. I don't see how you can call me fishy.
I lose TWO starting running backs in a 12-team league - I can't play them at all, if the trade is processed after kickoff of the Pats - Jets game.
This post was edited on 9/12/13 at 11:21 pm
Posted on 9/12/13 at 11:21 pm to TigerTatorTots
I vote whatever fricks over Hat this week,
Posted on 9/12/13 at 11:21 pm to MrWiseGuy
I get what you're saying...I just wouldn't have assumed that I would have Richardson on Sunday when I just traded him. JMO.
You're not fishy...It just looks fishy from my attempt at an unbiased perspective.
You're not fishy...It just looks fishy from my attempt at an unbiased perspective.
This post was edited on 9/12/13 at 11:23 pm
Posted on 9/12/13 at 11:22 pm to MrWiseGuy
I don't think its fishy or anything, but I do agree with Drake in the fact that I always push trades through rather quickly. What if I would have pushed the trade through tomorrow? You didn't say anything in here stating that 'If the trade isn't pushed through before kickoff, I intend to start Drich this weekend'. The whole time I was under the impression that this trade was executed with understanding that it would reflect weekend games.
That is the reason why I'm giving you guys the option to rescind the trade
That is the reason why I'm giving you guys the option to rescind the trade
This post was edited on 9/12/13 at 11:23 pm
Posted on 9/12/13 at 11:23 pm to drake20
quote:
.I just wouldn't have assumed that I would have Richardson on Sunday when I just traded him. JMO.
Agreed. On the other hand, the communication was lacking so I think it's smart to put it on hold until next week. I have no rooting interest, just don't want anyone to get screwed over.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 11:24 pm to MrWiseGuy
quote:That is true, but why didn't you say anything about who you would want started if the trade was processed after the kickoff? I can't read your mind that you wanted Powell in...I was told that after half of a game was played.
I lose TWO starting running backs in a 12-team league - I can't play them at all, if the trade is processed after kickoff of the Pats - Jets game.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 11:25 pm to CQQ
quote:
it's smart to put it on hold until next week
quote:does not compute
just don't want anyone to get screwed over.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 11:25 pm to TigerTatorTots
quote:
What if I would have pushed the trade through tomorrow?
I'd have the same argument.
You think I'd rather Daryl Richardson over Amendola for the ROS?
But, it totally fricks me over for the week.
Page 59 of 159
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News