Started By
Message
locked post

Article: which team finishes higher Texas A&M or LSU?

Posted on 5/16/13 at 4:02 pm
Posted by toughcrittercrumb
Houston
Member since Nov 2008
2160 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 4:02 pm
Braden Gall (@BradenGall)
I don’t think this debate is even close. Texas A&M will finish ahead of LSU and could challenge for an SEC West title while the Bayou Bengals could lose as many as four games. Every team in the SEC could be as good or better in 2013 than it was in 2012 with the exception of LSU. A massive exodus of talent, a mediocre starting quarterback and improving SEC schedule leads me to believe that the Tigers will once again underachieve. The Aggies, too, must replace some big names — Joeckel, Swope, Moore, Porter — but have the core of their 10-win team back, including a superstar quarterback. Many around the league are concerned about the overall direction of the LSU program since the national title loss to Alabama and the rest of the SEC has gained significant ground on the Tigers. Games at Georgia, Mississippi State, Ole Miss and Alabama are nasty while home games with Florida, Texas A&M, Auburn and Arkansas provide plenty of challenges as well. And if TCU catches Les Miles’ bunch napping in Week 1, things could unravel quickly in Louisiana. Gig ‘Em.

LINK
Posted by LSU fan 246
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

A massive exodus of talent, a mediocre starting quarterback and improving SEC schedule leads me to believe that the Tigers will once again underachieve


how do we underachieve if we are supposed to suck?
Posted by Moustache
GEAUX TIGERS
Member since May 2008
21657 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 4:05 pm to
Posted by lsusteve1
Member since Dec 2004
47982 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

A massive exodus of talent, a mediocre starting quarterback and improving SEC schedule leads me to believe that the Tigers will once again underachieve.


Bama and A&M lost more.....not to mention that easy arse schedule A&M and Bama have.

quote:

Many around the league are concerned about the overall direction of the LSU program since the national title loss to Alabama




He must not be paying much attention to recruiting

quote:

Gig ‘Em


Ahhhh....explains it

Posted by TexasTiger1185
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2011
13168 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 4:06 pm to
This Gall person has been insanely popular on the rant today.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
105416 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 4:12 pm to
Who is this clown?
Posted by liquid rabbit
Boxtard BPB®© emeritus
Member since Mar 2006
64982 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

Braden Gall

He's got a lot of...something.
Posted by c on z
Zamunda
Member since Mar 2009
130969 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

I don’t think this debate is even close.

lol
Posted by teeMike
In my mind, I'm already there.
Member since Feb 2007
7574 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 4:18 pm to
Posted by Soul Gleaux
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2012
4287 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

Article: which team finishes higher Texas A&M or LSU?


A&M. We lost Honey Badger, they still got Manziel.
Posted by MRTigerFan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
7118 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 4:20 pm to


Mr. Gall is obviously still butthurt about the beatdown his fAggies recieved last year at home against the Tigers.

Eta:
He's right. His "debate isn't even close" to rational thinking
This post was edited on 5/16/13 at 4:23 pm
Posted by JETigER
LSU 2011 National Champions
Member since Dec 2003
7081 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 4:22 pm to
If Jeremy Hill doesn't win the Heisman with runs against South Carolina and Texas A&M then Texas A&M finishes higher than LSU last year.
Posted by MRTigerFan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
7118 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

If Jeremy Hill doesn't win the Heisman with runs against South Carolina and Texas A&M then Texas A&M finishes higher than LSU last year.


J. Hill won the Heisman?
Posted by Geauxld Finger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
32600 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

Tigers will once again underachieve


so:
2009 - 9-3
2010 - 10-2
2011 - 12-0
2012 - 10-2


That's "underachieving?
This post was edited on 5/16/13 at 4:34 pm
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
41688 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 4:25 pm to
Everybody please quit copying Braden Gall's tweets.

Someone from LSU molested his sister, daughter, and mother and he's mad.
Posted by Jwodie
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2009
7461 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

If Jeremy Hill doesn't win the Heisman with runs against South Carolina and Texas A&M then Texas A&M finishes higher than LSU last year.


If my fat aunt had a dick she'd be my fat uncle.
Posted by BRUNNIN4
CenTex
Member since Mar 2010
3162 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

2012 - 10-2


FIFY
Posted by Jwodie
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2009
7461 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

the Tigers will once again underachieve


If winning the SEC in 2011 and finishing second in the West in 2012 (ahead of TAMU mind you) is "underachieving", I hope we keep underachieving forever.
Posted by SouthOfSouth
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2008
43586 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 4:29 pm to
There are tons of haters out there... It doesn't mean anything till the season. No worries here.
Posted by BRUNNIN4
CenTex
Member since Mar 2010
3162 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

J. Hill won the Heisman?


He also posted this on the SEC rant a few days ago.
quote:

It took the two greatest Heisman trophy plays of the year last year for LSU to survive with just 2 losses. LSU is not Big 5 LAST year if Jeremy Hill isn't a heisman stud.

I'm not sure he knows what the Heisman is
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram