- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Which do you think is more likely? The best QB in the NFL going 0-16, or the
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:12 pm
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:12 pm
worst going to and winning the Super Bowl?
(whole title wouldn't fit)
Should make for an interesting read. I would think it's harder to see a guy like Aaron Rodgers going 0-16, but then could you see a guy like Blaine Gabbert winning the Super Bowl? Even if he had all the best players around him, it's hard to see him winning it. At one point you'd need your QB to make some plays.
(whole title wouldn't fit)
Should make for an interesting read. I would think it's harder to see a guy like Aaron Rodgers going 0-16, but then could you see a guy like Blaine Gabbert winning the Super Bowl? Even if he had all the best players around him, it's hard to see him winning it. At one point you'd need your QB to make some plays.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:13 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
Brad Johnson won a Super Bowl. There's your answer.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:13 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
It's the latter, easily.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:14 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
latter
a top 3 QB is worth 5-6 wins a year with no supporting cast
a top 3 QB is worth 5-6 wins a year with no supporting cast
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:14 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
worst going to and winning the Super Bowl
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:15 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
worst going to and winning the Super Bowl?
think about how close mark sanchez was
plus, a mediocre QB just led a team to the title last year
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:15 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
Sanchez almost made it to back-to-back super bowls. 
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:15 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
Easily the worst Quarterback winning the Super Bowl.
It's next to impossible to think that a Brady, Brees, Manning, Rodgers, Ryan, Flacco, going 0-16, when we have had less than stellar (not worst in the league) win Super Bowls.
It's next to impossible to think that a Brady, Brees, Manning, Rodgers, Ryan, Flacco, going 0-16, when we have had less than stellar (not worst in the league) win Super Bowls.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
plus, a mediocre QB just led a team to the title last year
awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww shite
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:18 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
Should make for an interesting read.
not really
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
But here's the thing about the Sanchez argument.
He didn't go to the Super Bowl. Close doesn't count in football.
He didn't go to the Super Bowl. Close doesn't count in football.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:23 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
Well then Trent Dilfer.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:24 pm to TotesMcGotes
quote:
It's the latter, easily.
yeah it's not really close. If the odds were made for each it would be pretty lopsided.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:27 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
He didn't go to the Super Bowl. Close doesn't count in football.
The fact that he was a count hair away should be enough to settle the argument.
How close to 0-16 has a great QB ever come?
It's like the old "A 16 seed will never beat a 1 seed," argument. The fact that it has almost happened should be enough to convince someone that it's possible.
This post was edited on 5/13/13 at 11:28 pm
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:32 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
But here's the thing about the Sanchez argument.
He didn't go to the Super Bowl. Close doesn't count in football.
Rex Grossman did, this is a stupid question. Manning and Brady would win games with any team.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:38 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:well here's the thing about this question. It's fricking stupid
But here's the thing about the Sanchez argument. He didn't go to the Super Bowl. Close doesn't count in football.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:38 pm to NawlinsTiger9
I think we only have two win less teams of the "modern" NFL era.
The 1976 Tampa Bay Buccaneers
and
The 2008 Detroit Lions
Now this feat has only happened twice (and correct me if I am wrong) but has there ever been the case of a great, or even a good quarterback losing all their games in a season.
We have a list of Rypien, Dilfer, Johnson, Williams, Hostetler, and others, who while not the worst, managed to capture a Super Bowl title.
The 1976 Tampa Bay Buccaneers
and
The 2008 Detroit Lions
Now this feat has only happened twice (and correct me if I am wrong) but has there ever been the case of a great, or even a good quarterback losing all their games in a season.
We have a list of Rypien, Dilfer, Johnson, Williams, Hostetler, and others, who while not the worst, managed to capture a Super Bowl title.
This post was edited on 5/13/13 at 11:40 pm
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:42 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
Trent Dilpher won a Super Bowl
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:45 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
But here's the thing about the Sanchez argument.
He didn't go to the Super Bowl. Close doesn't count in football.
how much closer has the best QB come to his team going 0-16?
Popular
Back to top


9








