- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Another idiotic Reveille article...
Posted on 4/30/13 at 1:21 pm to bapple
Posted on 4/30/13 at 1:21 pm to bapple
My reply:
Ms. Dunbar,
Thankfully, we don't have to worry about "negatives in your book" becoming law just because you state it.
"Who wants it to be legally easier for more people on the streets to carry their own guns for a longer period of time?" I do. Myself, as well as most of the people I personally know.
"Are we planning to return to a post-apocalyptic military state soon?" Counter question. Do you think it's okay for the federal government to regulate when and where we can practice our rights as outlined in the Constitution of the United States?
"We don’t need this. If anything, we need tighter restrictions on who’s allowed to buy and keep guns." Please refer to the previous statement.
"Those who oppose restrictions might think they would work against law-abiding citizens being able to protect their families, but I disagree." The same Constitution entitles you to do just that.
Please at least backup your opinions with facts in your future endeavors.
Ms. Dunbar,
Thankfully, we don't have to worry about "negatives in your book" becoming law just because you state it.
"Who wants it to be legally easier for more people on the streets to carry their own guns for a longer period of time?" I do. Myself, as well as most of the people I personally know.
"Are we planning to return to a post-apocalyptic military state soon?" Counter question. Do you think it's okay for the federal government to regulate when and where we can practice our rights as outlined in the Constitution of the United States?
"We don’t need this. If anything, we need tighter restrictions on who’s allowed to buy and keep guns." Please refer to the previous statement.
"Those who oppose restrictions might think they would work against law-abiding citizens being able to protect their families, but I disagree." The same Constitution entitles you to do just that.
Please at least backup your opinions with facts in your future endeavors.
0
Posted on 4/30/13 at 1:22 pm to Bleeding purple
I commented. It'll be up in a while
Posted on 4/30/13 at 1:22 pm to Bleeding purple
Pretty much every reveille opinion article is a shitty troll. Ever.
Posted on 4/30/13 at 1:23 pm to bapple
Can someone provide me the statistic of percentage of gun crimes being CCL holders?
Posted on 4/30/13 at 1:24 pm to TigerTatorTots
Posted on 4/30/13 at 1:26 pm to bapple
I thought messican was carrying in the front?
Posted on 4/30/13 at 1:30 pm to BayouBrawl
Wow impressive. Without adding up all the gun crimes, it's safe to say CcL holders account for less than 1% of total gun crimes?
Posted on 4/30/13 at 1:31 pm to BayouBrawl
Good link but they should also include the ratio of CC offenders to total number of CCers. Then compare that rate to the non CC offenders in relation to all non CCers
Posted on 4/30/13 at 1:33 pm to Drew Orleans
Because one could argue that offenders in general represent less than 1 percent of the entire population.
Posted on 4/30/13 at 1:36 pm to jimbeam
quote:
Shut up Meg.
Posted on 4/30/13 at 1:36 pm to Bleeding purple
Megan Dunbar is a 19-year-old [strikethrough] English junior [/strikethrough] airhead from Greenville, S.C.
Posted on 4/30/13 at 1:36 pm to Drew Orleans
I have always considered "Mexican Carry" to be carried up front, in a waistband, with no holster.
Use it. Ditch it. No evidence of a holster.
I am not overly fond of the "small of the back" carry.
Not as easy to access.
Could damage your spine if you were to go on your back in a fight or accident or whatnot.
Use it. Ditch it. No evidence of a holster.
I am not overly fond of the "small of the back" carry.
Not as easy to access.
Could damage your spine if you were to go on your back in a fight or accident or whatnot.
Posted on 4/30/13 at 1:37 pm to bapple
So she just got a picture of some random black guy with a pistol just sitting in his pants while his finger is in the trigger? Smart
Oh yeah, IWNHI. That speaks volumes because I will bang anything that doesn't waddle
Oh yeah, IWNHI. That speaks volumes because I will bang anything that doesn't waddle
Posted on 4/30/13 at 1:40 pm to Hammertime
Comment is up 
Posted on 4/30/13 at 1:40 pm to jimbeam
I replied to her as well.
Posted on 4/30/13 at 1:51 pm to CajunFootball
Was gonna troll the ugly out of her, but that stupid website won't let me sign up for some reason
Suck my balls Meg
Suck my balls Meg
Posted on 4/30/13 at 1:52 pm to CajunFootball
Wow.
Seems that she doesn't know much about the subject of her opinion.
It sure does seem to me that way too many gun control advocates don't know shite from Shinola when it comes to firearms and the laws that currently pertain to them.
Seems that she doesn't know much about the subject of her opinion.
It sure does seem to me that way too many gun control advocates don't know shite from Shinola when it comes to firearms and the laws that currently pertain to them.
Posted on 4/30/13 at 2:10 pm to Drew Orleans
quote:
I thought messican was carrying in the front?
I think so. But at least in my definition, it's slapping a handgun in your waistline without a holster, leaving the trigger exposed.
It's very idiotic and an accident (hole in the arse, one fewer testicle) waiting to happen.
Posted on 4/30/13 at 2:10 pm to bapple
Drew Orleans response has been submitted.
Posted on 4/30/13 at 2:30 pm to bapple
It was written by a 19 yr old female, it was terribly written, facitious, overly wordy and just outright ignorant. There is just no quality control at the Reveille anymore.
This quote tells me that a tops scholarship and a college education has been wasted.
quote:
Who wants it to be legally easier for more people on the streets to carry their own guns for a longer period of time? Are we planning to return to a post-apocalyptic military state soon?
This quote tells me that a tops scholarship and a college education has been wasted.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News