Started By
Message
locked post

Y'all remember the guy that posted in that thread about having his FFL?

Posted on 4/18/13 at 9:01 pm
Posted by KingRanch
The Ranch
Member since Mar 2012
61759 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 9:01 pm
He just sent me this after talking about him being able to get a Ruger SR1911. I know they are impossible to find btw but don't try and talk me into a piece of shite Remington 1911 w/mil specs.

quote:

I actually think the Remington is a better quality than the Ruger. Better trigger tightness, overall better history of reliability, and cheaper price. Check the forums, you will see mixed reviews, but overall more lean to the Remington.


Posted by Nodust
Member since Aug 2010
22804 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

Remington

No to them in general
Posted by KingRanch
The Ranch
Member since Mar 2012
61759 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 9:03 pm to
In light of recent events you couldn't be more correct. But their 1911's are shite. Even the enhanced.
Posted by INFIDEL
The couch
Member since Aug 2006
16199 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 9:04 pm to
I've handled both and I can't say I completely disagree with him. At the very least I would call them "comparable". Now take into account Remington's recent poor decisions, I would probably lean Ruger.
Posted by jsb29
Dothan, AL
Member since Apr 2011
613 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 9:05 pm to
I'm a used car salesman and I've got a Gremlin here that would suit you waaaay better than that Silverado you're looking to buy.
Posted by INFIDEL
The couch
Member since Aug 2006
16199 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 9:06 pm to
quote:

But their 1911's are shite. Even the enhanced.


Elaborate.
Posted by KingRanch
The Ranch
Member since Mar 2012
61759 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 9:07 pm to
No, the mil spec Remington is shite compared to the Ruger SR1911 at the same price point.

The Ruger has full beaver tail, match trigger and hammer. Novak sights. The mil spec Remington has none of that.
Posted by hypnos
Member since Dec 2009
2227 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 9:08 pm to
It will be a long time before I buy a Remington weapon new. Im going to hold out until they go out of business and get bought out by a responsible firearms corporation.
Posted by INFIDEL
The couch
Member since Aug 2006
16199 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 9:09 pm to
quote:

No, the mil spec Remington is shite compared to the Ruger SR1911 at the same price point.

The Ruger has full beaver tail, match trigger and hammer. Novak sights. The mil spec Remington has none of that.




Oh, I see where you're coming from with that argument. But other then "upgrades" the two pistols are pretty much a push IMO. I do agree that the Ruger has more bells a whistles for basically the same price, but if you're looking for a mil spec 1911..........
Posted by INFIDEL
The couch
Member since Aug 2006
16199 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 9:11 pm to
quote:

match trigger


Wait, what? I haven't been impressed with the Ruger triggers. Not that I'm impressed with the Remingtons AT ALL, but both are far from what a 1911 should be.
Posted by bapple
Capital City
Member since Oct 2010
12235 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 9:11 pm to
I agree that Remington won't get a dime of my money due to recent events but...

quote:

Even the enhanced.


... I think the Enhanced threaded is pretty nice. I've held one and checked it out. It's got solid build quality, a good finish, and raised sights all from the factory. It's pretty high quality.

Then again, won't be getting one...
Posted by KingRanch
The Ranch
Member since Mar 2012
61759 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 9:12 pm to
If your looking for a mil spec 1911 you can't beat the citadel at $550ish.
Posted by KingRanch
The Ranch
Member since Mar 2012
61759 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 9:13 pm to
I should have said skeletonized.....sorry.

Posted by INFIDEL
The couch
Member since Aug 2006
16199 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 9:16 pm to
No, I actually bought the Remington a while back on an impulse. I was there, it was there, the Ruger wasn't there, so I brought it home.

Trigger isn't good, but other then that it is what I expected it to be. I'm going to pick up a Ruger when I happen upon one.
Posted by INFIDEL
The couch
Member since Aug 2006
16199 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

I should have said skeletonized.....sorry.



Yeah, I figured that's what you meant.
Posted by chesty
Flap City C.C.
Member since Oct 2012
12731 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 9:30 pm to
Not to interrupt and show my ignorance of 1911's, but what's the deal with citadel? Are they a decent manufacturer or low end garbage? I'll hang up and listen.
Posted by KingRanch
The Ranch
Member since Mar 2012
61759 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 9:31 pm to
VERY solid entry 1911
Posted by JAB528
The Mexican Ocean
Member since Jun 2012
16870 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 9:42 pm to


Remington's 1911 is an overpriced tickleshit.
Posted by Rize
Spring Texas
Member since Sep 2011
19484 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 9:58 pm to
How about a springfield?
This post was edited on 4/18/13 at 10:00 pm
Posted by CoastieGM
Member since Aug 2012
3185 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 10:07 pm to
OK. I'm really scratching my head here.

How can one milspec 1911 be so different from another milspec.

i worked on lots of military 1911's made from several manufacturers (Colt, Remington, etc. ...hell, even Singer sewing machine company). They were all exactly the same with interchangeable parts.

What am I missing here?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram