Started By
Message
locked post

What makes Syracuses's zone so effective?

Posted on 4/2/13 at 9:22 am
Posted by DesmondHume
Island
Member since Mar 2013
661 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 9:22 am
The 2-3 is something that's taught all the way down to little kid rec leagues. Granted, at 8 years old all 5 players basically just stand still, but the 2-3 concept is taught at a young age. I'm sure plenty of high schools use it too. So basically, why is it so much decidedly more effective at syracuse? I realize that they incorporate some man into it as well (can someone elaborate a little more on that, because I'm a little unclear on where that comes in), but it's still essentially a 2-3 zone. Do they just run it to absolute perfection, is that it?

And if that is the case, then

a)how come more teams don't start running it too, and

b)how come after years and years of footage of boeheim running it there, why can more teams not have success against it?
Posted by DownSouthCrawfish
Lift every voice and sing
Member since Oct 2011
41288 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 9:24 am to
quote:

What makes Syracuses's zone so effective?
Boeheim is running a 2-3 zone with giants. Average player height is 6-6. Makes it really hard to get ball movement when there seems to be an arm in every passing lane.
This post was edited on 4/2/13 at 9:26 am
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
68948 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 9:25 am to
Posted by DesmondHume
Island
Member since Mar 2013
661 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 9:25 am to
quote:

Bunk Moreland


thanks for the link
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45219 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 9:26 am to
You force players to shoot from mid to long range OR you require them to be patient and play with discipline in the half court game.

There's your answer.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
68948 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 9:27 am to
I said the same thing as you after the Indiana game. 34 fricking years of tape to look at, and Tom Crean still got embarrassed by Jim Boeheim.
Posted by FootballNostradamus
Member since Nov 2009
20509 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 9:36 am to
The zone succeeds for a number of reasons.

1. Similar to any unorthodox or rarely used system, it has the advantage of forcing its opponent to adapt while it continues with the formula it's been drilling all season.

Most coaches spend 90+% of their time drilling man-to-man offenses so they are now forced to use systems they and their players aren't as comfortable using. Think the same thing in CFB where a team like Georgia Tech forces you to prepare for the triple option in one week.

2. Boeheim knows how to recruit length and athleticism. The lanes they can cover up with their length is insane.

3. Their rotations are incredible. The main components here are the frontside wing and the backside guard. The wings are so quick to help on the perimeter and then double down in the corner or on the block, and the backside guards are so adept at sliding into the paint and picking off entry passes to the high post.

4. Lastly, they treat the frontside like a man scheme and are constantly moving/active. This keeps defenses from having stand-still defenders in a zone that they can backscreen. Syracuse is always moving and never standing still.

It's a beauty to watch.
Posted by coachLSU
Member since Jan 2005
22631 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 9:49 am to
quote:

Most coaches spend 90+% of their time drilling man-to-man offenses so they are now forced to use systems they and their players aren't as comfortable using.


False
Posted by FootballNostradamus
Member since Nov 2009
20509 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 9:53 am to
quote:

False


It's at bare minimum 80%. No one spends more than a fifth of their time drilling zone offenses when they will see them less than 10% of the year.
Posted by Kracka
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Aug 2004
42408 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 10:00 am to
They are long, athletic, and very good basketball players. Every time Syracuse makes a deep run in the tourney, they are always the same type of players. quick guards that can guard the backcourt, and long lanky quick, athletic front court players that can cover alot of the floor quickly.
Posted by JOHNN
Prairieville
Member since Nov 2008
4501 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 10:05 am to
Simple answer: Length
Posted by lowspark12
nashville, tn
Member since Aug 2009
22596 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 10:10 am to
quote:

how come after years and years of footage of boeheim running it there, why can more teams not have success against it?


it takes a certain type of player to succeed against that defense... someone with good size, can handle the ball, and can maneuver in traffic... in 2003 (the year SU won the NC), Auburn faced them in the regional semis... we lost the game (by one point) but had some success against the matchup zone. The key was marquis daniels (spent time with the mavs, celtics, and now bucks)... he's a small forward with the ball skills of a point guard... we got him the ball at the foul line, and he either made the jumper or drove to the basket.

Porter Jr is a good example of someone who gave their zone trouble... a guy who was tough, had good size, and can score.

IMO, to beat SU's matchup zone, you have to get the ball inside and pass out... the passing around the paremeter looking for a shot will get you killed (see indiana).
Posted by TxTiger82
Member since Sep 2004
34327 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 10:18 am to
quote:

Do they just run it to absolute perfection, is that it?


Yeah they get really long, athletic defenders who can close quickly. They get pressure on shots and they rebound well.

quote:

a)how come more teams don't start running it too, and


By itself it isn't a formula for winning it all. Syracuse gets beat most years. In fact, they underachieve in the tourney most years. They hang their hats on 2003 but they had a transcendent scorer that year.

quote:

b)how come after years and years of footage of boeheim running it there, why can more teams not have success against it?


Syracuse gets beat (like clockwork), when they come across a team that is hot from the outside. If you make your outside shots, the entire zone defense starts to crumble.

Posted by jimithing11
Dillon, Texas
Member since Mar 2011
22532 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 10:45 am to
quote:

Simple answer: Length

Posted by Patrick_Bateman
Member since Jan 2012
17823 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 11:32 am to
One word: Length.

ETA: Damn, someone beat me to it.
This post was edited on 4/2/13 at 11:33 am
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84451 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 11:34 am to
When the ball gets to the weak side, the zone collapses on the players in the form of a double team.

It's things like this.
Posted by bnh
Earth
Member since Feb 2011
1546 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 11:36 am to
Its simple: length and athleticism
Posted by VABuckeye
NOVA
Member since Dec 2007
38283 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 11:38 am to
quote:

Its simple: length and athleticism


There's one more piece of that equation.

Rotations. Syracuse is extremely disciplined in their rotations on the zone. You cannot get them out of shape by simply putting 4 guards on the perimeter and passing the ball around the zone. You have to attack it from the inside out (ala Ohio State last year in the tournament) and make the zone compress and expand to create open shot opportunities.
Posted by rutiger
purgatory
Member since Jun 2007
21936 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 11:40 am to
quote:

Syracuse gets beat (like clockwork), when they come across a team that is hot from the outside. If you make your outside shots, the entire zone defense starts to crumble.


this is what i was coming to say.
Posted by xenythx
Member since Dec 2007
33407 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 11:41 am to
Most teams nowadays lack the ball movement and shooters to shoot them out of it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram