If you need any more proof we need a PG - Page 2 - TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
jkerr4LSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2012
137 posts

re: If you need any more proof we need a PG


look guys, the last ROY the hornets had left, so maybe it is a good sign that AD is not winning that this year





Back to top
  Replies (0)
BulldogTiger
Louisiana Tech Fan
Ruston
Member since Mar 2013
41 posts

re: If you need any more proof we need a PG


One damn game.

I think the better question is, was Robert's crazy game the other night more indicative of his potential ability, or that Greivis is easily replaceable?






Back to top
ralsu
LSU Fan
new orleans
Member since Jul 2009
2009 posts

re: If you need any more proof we need a PG


quote:

Greivis is easily replaceable

+1






Back to top
motorbreath
New Orleans Saints Fan
Atlanta Braves Fan
Member since Jun 2004
4386 posts

re: If you need any more proof we need a PG


yer dum





Back to top
  Replies (0)
BayouFann
New Orleans Saints Fan
North Dallas
Member since Jun 2012
3492 posts

re: If you need any more proof we need a PG


quote:

Vasquez has been money all year

quote:

one of the best PGs in the league stat-wise

according to espn yes. to the eyes of in game watchers, so so meh!






Back to top
WhoDatPelican596
New Orleans Pelicans Fan
Little Rock
Member since Jan 2013
751 posts

re: If you need any more proof we need a PG


@motorbreath "stat-wise" lol. Vasquez wont be on this team next year. Good to no some people here are figuring out he is not anything close to a good PG





Back to top
eyeran
New Orleans Pelicans Fan
New Orleans
Member since Dec 2007
17037 posts

re: If you need any more proof we need a PG


Haters Gonna Hate.







Back to top
  Replies (0)
THRILLHO
New Orleans Saints Fan
New Orleans, LA
Member since Apr 2006
33735 posts

re: If you need any more proof we need a PG


quote:

Good to no some people


Oh lawd.

Some of you are arguing against people that don't really exist. No one here thinks Vasquez is some world beater that can't/shouldn't be upgraded. He's a serviceable PG that would be a good enough starter to contend for a championship on a team like loaded with talent elsewhere (pretty much just Miami right now, LA a few years ago), and would be a great first guard off the bench for any team (which is valuable, especially with his contract). If he's starting for us 3 years from now, then AD better be Duncan 2.0, EG has to have been healthy/consistently play like he did tonight, and we'd better have an All Star caliber 3 and/or 5. But it's not going to be the end of the world if we can't land a clear upgrade at the point and he starts for us again next season. This team minus Aminu + $12-18m in solid FA additions (and EG playing 65+ games) will still compete for the playoffs next year with Vasquez starting and will give us another year to see if Rivers can develop running an offense (which he's clearly more comfortable doing than playing off ball).






Back to top
1ranter1
LSU Fan
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2008
8089 posts

re: If you need any more proof we need a PG


14/9 while making $1.2M. 3rd in the NBA in assist.

You have to be a miserable piece of shite to hate on what he has done this season.






Back to top
corndeaux
New Orleans Pelicans Fan
Member since Sep 2009
5337 posts

re: If you need any more proof we need a PG


He's been much better than I thought he ever could be. But I think they will look to move him to a sub role.

We all know his limitations on.defense, but he needs the ball in his hands to be effective. When they get better players it wont make as much sense to let him dominate the ball all game like he has this season. Maybe his shot continues to develop and he is a threat off ball.

But being the focal point on offense with more limited players vs limited players would be a great role for him.

They dont need to move him and I dont think they should unless there is a good offer out there.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
TigerinATL
New Orleans Pelicans Fan
Member since Feb 2005
32782 posts
 Online 

re: If you need any more proof we need a PG


quote:

Some of you are arguing against people that don't really exist


He's not just arguing, he's even been bad mouthing us on twitter

quote:

@McNamara247 trying to be an educated fan and bring points about why Vasquez can't be our PG on tiger droppings- #ImpossibleToBeSuccessful


For those that don't speak twitter, that's him tweeting to Michael McNamara, he isn't MM.






Back to top
Fearthehat0307
New Orleans Pelicans Fan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2007
50799 posts

re: If you need any more proof we need a PG


quote:

He's not just arguing, he's even been bad mouthing us on twitter


quote:


@McNamara247 trying to be an educated fan and bring points about why Vasquez can't be our PG on tiger droppings- #ImpossibleToBeSuccessful




For those that don't speak twitter, that's him tweeting to Michael McNamara, he isn't MM.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
MrPappagiorgio
Ole Miss Fan
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2009
33614 posts
 Online 

re: If you need any more proof we need a PG


ohlawd







Back to top
  Replies (0)
quail man
New Orleans Pelicans Fan
New York, NY
Member since May 2010
24874 posts

re: If you need any more proof we need a PG








Back to top
  Replies (0)
ebouillion
LSU Fan
Member since Oct 2012
84 posts

re: If you need any more proof we need a PG


quote:

should've drafted lillard

LIllard is playing 40mins a game and Davis is playing 29mins and they have near the same PPG averages. Also davis touches the ball alot less and gets alot less shots. ALso davis is a young 19 year old un developed player while lillard is a 23 year old player that played 4 years in college. We made the right choice by far. Lillard at best will improve to a 20pt 7ast type of guy while davis will have the potential to become a superstar and could averege 25pts 12reb, maybe even more, in his prime. We made the right choice by far.






Back to top
ebouillion
LSU Fan
Member since Oct 2012
84 posts

re: If you need any more proof we need a PG


quote:

according to espn yes. to the eyes of in game watchers, so so meh!

I could not agree more. People need to quit worrying about the stats and focus on our team. A PG that like to dominate the ball like vasquez wont fit if we plan to build around davis.






Back to top
ebouillion
LSU Fan
Member since Oct 2012
84 posts

re: If you need any more proof we need a PG


quote:

I think the better question is, was Robert's crazy game the other night more indicative of his potential ability, or that Greivis is easily replaceable?

I personally think that monty just has a good system set up that PGs thrive in. Jack, Vasquez and Roberts all put up similar numbers in a starting role.






Back to top
ThePistol
LSU Fan
Lafayette, LA
Member since Mar 2007
504 posts

re: If you need any more proof we need a PG


I was very pleased with GV's play earlier in the year. Recently, I have felt his dominance of the ball is hindering EG and AD. I think I fall in the "GV would be a great guard off the bench" camp now.





Back to top
  Replies (0)
corndeaux
New Orleans Pelicans Fan
Member since Sep 2009
5337 posts

re: If you need any more proof we need a PG


quote:

. A PG that like to dominate the ball like vasquez 


like vasquez in quality or any ball dominating pg?






Back to top
  Replies (0)
Fearthehat0307
New Orleans Pelicans Fan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2007
50799 posts

re: If you need any more proof we need a PG


quote:

LIllard is playing 40mins a game and Davis is playing 29mins and they have near the same PPG averages. Also davis touches the ball alot less and gets alot less shots. ALso davis is a young 19 year old un developed player while lillard is a 23 year old player that played 4 years in college. We made the right choice by far. Lillard at best will improve to a 20pt 7ast type of guy while davis will have the potential to become a superstar and could averege 25pts 12reb, maybe even more, in his prime. We made the right choice by far.
sorry I didn't include the sarcastic font in my post






Back to top
  Replies (0)


Back to top