Started By
Message
locked post

The Pacific vs. Band of Brothers

Posted on 3/25/13 at 10:19 am
Posted by Bluefin
The Banana Stand
Member since Apr 2011
13502 posts
Posted on 3/25/13 at 10:19 am
Which did you enjoy more?

Recently started rewatching Band of Brothers and I had forgotten just how awesome this series was. While I think BoB is more exciting overall and has the compelling story of Easy Company that develops throughout the series, The Pacific does a better job of showing the psychological trauma side of WWII that is often overlooked, and in a sense, effectively wears the viewer down by recreating the relentless will of the Japanese.

Both are very similar in the the story-telling aspect and do an amazing job in paying homage to the actual veterans of WWII, and for that I can't decide which I enjoy more (not that I have to choose, but it makes for an interesting discussion.)
This post was edited on 3/25/13 at 10:22 am
Posted by USMC Gators
Member since Oct 2011
14633 posts
Posted on 3/25/13 at 10:21 am to
BoB.
GK is better than both though.
Posted by Fleur De Lethal
NOLA
Member since Aug 2009
990 posts
Posted on 3/25/13 at 10:22 am to
Band of Brothers for me because there were so many characters that I loved.
Posted by dallastiger55
Jennings, LA
Member since Jan 2010
34399 posts
Posted on 3/25/13 at 10:28 am to
I enjoyed them both but don't get why so many people hate on the pacific.


It was very well done
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
156787 posts
Posted on 3/25/13 at 10:31 am to
I've only seen the first third or so of The Pacific. I kinda lost interest in it (but I bought it and will watch it one day). However, Band of Brothers is the second-best* TV miniseries in history IMO.

ETA: Behind Planet Earth.
This post was edited on 3/25/13 at 10:32 am
Posted by Kevin TheRant
Member since Nov 2010
1925 posts
Posted on 3/25/13 at 10:32 am to
I enjoyed both.

In general I have always been more interested in the european theatre. So I would watch BoB over Pacific.
Posted by tigerfan in bamaland
Back Home now
Member since Sep 2006
61543 posts
Posted on 3/25/13 at 10:36 am to
I enjoyed both, but as a Marine, I am a little biased towards The Pacific.

It's unfair to compare IMO because they are so different.
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
58327 posts
Posted on 3/25/13 at 10:38 am to
BoB better but Pacific stands up well. Just a different way of telling a story. A couple of the actors in P you just couldn't relate too. Seems they went more for some hollywood than regular guy type actors.
Posted by NS Who Dat Nation
BR
Member since Jul 2007
8805 posts
Posted on 3/25/13 at 10:40 am to
quote:

It's unfair to compare IMO because they are so different.


Exactly. Overall I liked BoB better, but that takes nothing away from the Pacific. It was so different that it's very hard to compare. Still think BoB was the best thing I've ever seen on TV.
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 3/25/13 at 10:43 am to
Haven't seen The Pacific yet, plan to. Loved BoB.
Posted by Wooly
Member since Feb 2012
13851 posts
Posted on 3/25/13 at 10:48 am to
Band of brothers was better, better character development.

i didnt like pacific because all the characters looked way too much alike and i couldnt tell them a part
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95793 posts
Posted on 3/25/13 at 10:58 am to
quote:

I've only seen the first third or so of The Pacific. I kinda lost interest in it


I didn't get hooked by the first episode and never finished it.

quote:

However, Band of Brothers is the second-best* TV miniseries in history IMO.


I have it second as well, but the first prize goes to (effectively the same production team, though) From the Earth to the Moon.
Posted by shifty94
San Antonio, TX
Member since Oct 2010
2895 posts
Posted on 3/25/13 at 12:23 pm to
Band of Brothers was the better one. The Pacific was good, but for me it just took a while for the interest level to get there.
Posted by Bluefin
The Banana Stand
Member since Apr 2011
13502 posts
Posted on 3/25/13 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

all the characters looked way too much alike and i couldnt tell them a part

I agree. I do wish there would have been more introduction and development with the characters when the series started off, but I think The Pacific was ultimately about who the characters "became" by the end of the war, unlike BoB. The Pacific did seem sort of slow because of this.
This post was edited on 3/25/13 at 12:25 pm
Posted by shifty94
San Antonio, TX
Member since Oct 2010
2895 posts
Posted on 3/25/13 at 12:26 pm to
double post
This post was edited on 3/25/13 at 12:30 pm
Posted by boxcarbarney
Above all things, be a man
Member since Jul 2007
26775 posts
Posted on 3/25/13 at 1:39 pm to
BoB was better, but I still like Pacific. With BoB, we were able to follow these characters, watch them grow. Pacific didn't have that feel to it. Also, with BoB being in the European theater, I think it was easier to follow the progression of the war; west to east. With the Pacific, the battles were all over the map, and it was difficult to see/understand an overall strategy.

quote:

characters looked way too much alike and i couldnt tell them a part


I had the same problem. It wasn't until the second time I watched it that I was able to tell the characters apart. Like every person who fought in the Pacific theater was a dark haired Italian from New York (with the exception of Sledge Hammer)

This post was edited on 3/25/13 at 1:50 pm
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
65759 posts
Posted on 3/25/13 at 2:00 pm to
BoB. The story is more linear and less fragmented, and of course, it's the greatest miniseries of all time.

I enjoyed The Pacific, but there were too many story lines. It wasn't hard to follow. It just didn't spend enough time on any one story line for me to become really engrossed in it.

Plus, the Easy Co. guys were always fricking shite up. The Pacific guys were always "tortured and destroyed by their experiences."

Whiny little bitch Marines.

ETA: Oh, and it made ZERO mention of the horrors thet American POW's endured at the hands of their Japanese captors.

I'm not a vet, but holy shite. How do yo tell a story about the Pacific war and not have that as one of your hundred competing story lines? That actually made me angry.
This post was edited on 3/25/13 at 2:03 pm
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
31567 posts
Posted on 3/25/13 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

GK is better than both though.

Come on. Really?


IMO, comparing BoB and Pacific is apples and oranges. Two very different wars, two very different enemies. While BoB made it much easier to get emotionally invested in the characters, I think it was more of a circumstance of the war in the Pacific than the series. Both were very well done.

That being said, I watch BoB about once a year. I've only seen The Pacific once.
Posted by LanceCriminal
Member since Mar 2013
336 posts
Posted on 3/25/13 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

BoB. GK is better than both though.


This is the right answer.
Posted by USMC Gators
Member since Oct 2011
14633 posts
Posted on 3/25/13 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

Come on. Really?

It's far more realistic without all the fake heroics and theatrics of BoB.

Edit: There's a reason that a lot of senior staff and officers hate GK and Evan Wright.
This post was edited on 3/25/13 at 2:12 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram