- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Matt Flynn will not be released by Seattle Seahawks
Posted on 3/2/13 at 8:58 am
Posted on 3/2/13 at 8:58 am
LINK
The NFL has a reputation as a copy-cat league. If one team has proven effective in a certain area, why wouldn't another team mimic that success?
Unlock HQ Video HQ video delivered by Akamai
Now that the San Francisco 49ers will collect at least a high second-round pick for their backup quarterback, Alex Smith, after insisting that he would not be released, the Seattle Seahawks are attempting to follow suit.
NFL.com's Ian Rapoport reported Thursday on "NFL Total Access" the Seahawks will not cut Matt Flynn. In fact, a team source insists the "priority" is to retain Flynn as Russell Wilson insurance since the starter is one of the NFL's best bargains.
The NFL has a reputation as a copy-cat league. If one team has proven effective in a certain area, why wouldn't another team mimic that success?
Unlock HQ Video HQ video delivered by Akamai
Now that the San Francisco 49ers will collect at least a high second-round pick for their backup quarterback, Alex Smith, after insisting that he would not be released, the Seattle Seahawks are attempting to follow suit.
NFL.com's Ian Rapoport reported Thursday on "NFL Total Access" the Seahawks will not cut Matt Flynn. In fact, a team source insists the "priority" is to retain Flynn as Russell Wilson insurance since the starter is one of the NFL's best bargains.
3
Posted on 3/2/13 at 9:07 am to blackjackjackson
Makes since, but when will they have to pay Russell?
Posted on 3/2/13 at 9:07 am to blackjackjackson
Seriously, they would be idiots to not get something for him.
Posted on 3/2/13 at 9:14 am to blackjackjackson
It costs them virtually nothing to keep him instead of cutting him, at least for this year
This post was edited on 3/2/13 at 9:15 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News