Started By
Message
locked post

NCAA recommends ejection for targeting defenseless players

Posted on 2/13/13 at 1:19 pm
Posted by medtiger
Member since Sep 2003
21631 posts
Posted on 2/13/13 at 1:19 pm
LINK

I'm all for player safety, but this is getting ridiculous, especially this part:

quote:

The proposed rule will mirror the penalty for fighting. If the foul occurs in the first half of a game, the player is ejected for the remainder of the game. If the foul occurs in the second half or overtime of a game, the player is ejected for the remainder of the game and the first half of the next contest.
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
150441 posts
Posted on 2/13/13 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

I'm all for player safety, but this is getting ridiculous

..and it's only gonna continue to get worse.
Posted by VegasPro
Vegas
Member since Aug 2011
2706 posts
Posted on 2/13/13 at 1:21 pm to
No way to be fair in this. There are times where someone is not flagged and fined, then others not fined but flagged.
This post was edited on 2/13/13 at 1:22 pm
Posted by saturday
Pronoun (Baw)
Member since Feb 2007
7088 posts
Posted on 2/13/13 at 1:21 pm to
god bless america
Posted by medtiger
Member since Sep 2003
21631 posts
Posted on 2/13/13 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

No way to be fair in this. There are times where someone is not flagged and fined, then others not fined but flagged.


This is college football...there are no fines. This will be only for hits that are flagged on the field.
Posted by graychef
Member since Jun 2008
28298 posts
Posted on 2/13/13 at 1:28 pm to
The interpretations of these hits will vary across the board.
Posted by stptiger
Covington, Louisiana
Member since Feb 2013
158 posts
Posted on 2/13/13 at 1:30 pm to
NCAA- the new flag football league
Posted by VABuckeye
Naples, FL
Member since Dec 2007
35457 posts
Posted on 2/13/13 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

The interpretations of these hits will vary across the board.


Exactly. I have no problem with an ejection for a clear, flagrant hit. Where do they draw the line though.

This post was edited on 2/13/13 at 1:32 pm
Posted by WITNESS23
Member since Feb 2010
13719 posts
Posted on 2/13/13 at 1:33 pm to
Can you imagine how 1 call can ruin a game. or a SEASON
Posted by nicholastiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
42047 posts
Posted on 2/13/13 at 1:44 pm to
Except when Bama does it in the SEC title game
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 2/13/13 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

Except when Bama does it in the SEC title game

Are you defenseless if you are moving towards the play?
Posted by tokenBoiler
Lafayette, Indiana
Member since Aug 2012
4404 posts
Posted on 2/13/13 at 2:00 pm to
Was Smith (Michigan) 'defenseless'? Was Clowney 'targeting' him?

There is already enough leeway in the rules for a ref to toss someone for excessive deliberate viciousness. This rule would just screw up the first 2 or 3 games of the season, then be ignored, then get pulled out at the worst possible time in a late game.

Better to just put a word in the refs' and coaches' ears in the preseason, and make it clear to both groups that assholery will merit an ejection if somebody might get hurt, and the NCAA will back up the refs in any argument.
Posted by CAT
Central Arkansas
Member since Aug 2006
7065 posts
Posted on 2/13/13 at 2:06 pm to
So would Loston had been ejected for the phantom hit on the USC WR even though he didn't make contact? There was a foul called and as Kirk H put it, there was intent.
Posted by tokenBoiler
Lafayette, Indiana
Member since Aug 2012
4404 posts
Posted on 2/13/13 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

quote:
The interpretations of these hits will vary across the board.


Exactly. I have no problem with an ejection for a clear, flagrant hit. Where do they draw the line though.



That would be my concern, too. Maybe a more-or-less incidental but hard helmet to helmet, which seems to get called quite a bit, should get just the PF call, and the ejection should be reserved for when it's clearly deliberate. Same deal on crossing pattern collisions -- it seems to me there's a difference between a hard hit that could get flagged because the hitter could have avoided it (at the risk of a big play against him) and a guy clearly nailing somebody who doesn't have a prayer of making a catch (or tackle). I'd be afraid that any new rule would lump those things together; better to let the refs decide and just encourage them to be tougher on the truly bad plays.

Coaches and players will go right up to the line (and a little beyond once in a while) if the line is a bright one. Any rule that codifies the 'ejection' line will just create a new standard for play, a standard nastier than what's happening now. Make them know that that line is a little vague, and it has a better chance of actually keeping the unneeded viciousness down.
Posted by Keltic Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2006
19224 posts
Posted on 2/13/13 at 2:50 pm to
This needs to be cleared by the SEC/bama league office to make sure the SEC refs know who not to call it on.
Posted by VABuckeye
Naples, FL
Member since Dec 2007
35457 posts
Posted on 2/13/13 at 3:21 pm to
Here is an example of a hit that I think should be an ejection. It's not a particularly vicious hit but it seems the intent is clear to attack the exposed head. Kurt Coleman hit on Illinois running back
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
18981 posts
Posted on 2/13/13 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

Here is an example of a hit that I think should be an ejection. It's not a particularly vicious hit but it seems the intent is clear to attack the exposed head. Kurt Coleman hit on Illinois running back


Thats borderline. Nothing wrong with the hit to the head(the QB was dragging guys forward). But the QBs knee was actually down before he made the last surge forward although its really hard to tell if Coleman could see that.
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
41125 posts
Posted on 2/13/13 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

The interpretations of these hits will vary across the board.


Based on previous ejections this will only be worse-

Ejected for a legal hit
Posted by Harry Caray
Denial
Member since Aug 2009
18633 posts
Posted on 2/13/13 at 3:53 pm to
there really needs to be a yellow/red card system in football.
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
18981 posts
Posted on 2/13/13 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

there really needs to be a yellow/red card system in football.

It wouldn't help
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram