Started By
Message
locked post

Will the Ravens let Flacco go?

Posted on 2/11/13 at 5:34 pm
Posted by Nonetheless
MAGA
Member since Jan 2012
34413 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 5:34 pm
quote:

SI's Peter King isn't "so sure" the Ravens will use the exclusive-rights franchise tag on free agent Joe Flacco.
King believes it's "actually possible" the Ravens use the non-exclusive tag, and that Flacco could be "stolen by a quarterback-needy and starved-for-relevance team." King concedes it's not "probable," but floats the Browns, Cardinals and Bills as possible pursuers should Flacco receive the non-exclusive tag. King seems particularly keen on the idea of Cleveland making a run. Per King, the Ravens and Flacco will begin negotiating a long-term deal this week. The deadline to apply the franchise tag is March 4.


LINK

I might be in the minority, but I don't think he's worth Brady/Brees money.
Posted by fightingtiger2335
heh?
Member since Aug 2007
61157 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 5:35 pm to
frick I hope the bills don't overpay for him
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
61029 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 5:35 pm to
Yes, for Romo
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
116206 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 5:39 pm to
I dont think hes worth that but the Ravens have to pay him. It would be a PR disaster if they let him go

Although i think he would faulter behind the Cardinals OLine
Posted by Srbtiger06
Member since Apr 2006
29300 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 5:39 pm to
King just throws shite against the wall.
Posted by Wayne Campbell
Aurora, IL
Member since Oct 2011
7345 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

I might be in the minority, but I don't think he's worth Brady/Brees money.


I don't think he is either. But the Ravens gambled and lost. He may not be worth that money, but that's what it will cost for them to keep him. And I don't think Baltimore can afford to let him get away.

Flacco is easily top-10 in the league, and that's not so easy to replace.
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
69111 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

I don't think he is either. But the Ravens gambled and lost.


Agreed. But now they have to pay him.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
61029 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

Flacco is easily top-10 in the league, and that's not so easy to replace.


Well...there are 9 other guys
Posted by Brettesaurus Rex
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
38261 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 5:49 pm to
While I think he's very good and when he's on he's one of the best in the league, I don't think he can carry a team.
This post was edited on 2/11/13 at 5:50 pm
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41301 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 5:49 pm to
quote:

Well...there are 9 other guys


Who among them is looking for a new team?
Posted by craigbiggio
Member since Dec 2009
31805 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 5:51 pm to
quote:

Peter King


Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
174258 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 5:51 pm to
quote:



Who among them is looking for a new team?


Don't even try to argue with him. He's hopelessly stupid

And even if these guys were looking for another team, they aren't going to come at a discount either.
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
69111 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 5:52 pm to
If they let him go, who could they sign that will come in an win the superbowl and be the superbowl MVP?
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
61029 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 5:54 pm to
Romo
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41301 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 5:54 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477795 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

Flacco is easily top-10 in the league,

it's arguable, so it's not 'easy' imho

the best thing the ravens could do is let a team sign flacco for 2, 1sts and keep going to the playoffs with mediocre QBs
Posted by EyeoftheEldrick12
Member since Jul 2012
1949 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 6:16 pm to
Flacco ain't goin anywhere. And he will make the big bucks. Whether anyone likes it it not
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
69111 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 6:16 pm to
quote:

Romo



I'm sure Ozzie Newsome is on the phone to Jerry right now.
Posted by Keys Open Doors
In hiding with Tupac & XXXTentacion
Member since Dec 2008
32916 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 6:23 pm to
Flacco is top 10-12, but if the Ravens let him go, he will be very hard to replace since no one is going to let their marquee QBs go. Is anyone even close to free agency among the top 15-20 QBs?

I suppose they could trade for Matt Flynn or Alex Smith, but that seems crazy for a Super Bowl winner to do. And if I was SF, I would not trade Smith to a top contender. Same with Seattle and Flynn.
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31256 posts
Posted on 2/11/13 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

it's arguable, so it's not 'easy' imho

Flacco is somewhere in the second quartile of starting QB's.

quote:

the best thing the ravens could do is let a team sign flacco for 2, 1sts and keep going to the playoffs with mediocre QBs


While Flacco is not a QB who can put the team on his back (top four and sometimes the next four), there may a little too much of a decline to starting some rookie or current backup. I think Flacco deserves somewhere between 3/5 and 3/4 of the Brees contract. 5/70?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram