- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Did Nike have a Super Bowl commercial?
Posted on 2/4/13 at 2:16 pm
Posted on 2/4/13 at 2:16 pm
I don't recall seeing any shoe company with an ad. What gives?
The Air Jordan SB commercials were awesome back in the day.
The Air Jordan SB commercials were awesome back in the day.
3
Posted on 2/4/13 at 2:18 pm to Paul Allen
quote:LINK
The Air Jordan SB commercials were awesome back in the day.
Posted on 2/4/13 at 4:34 pm to JohnnyKilroy
Awesome
Posted on 2/4/13 at 5:24 pm to Paul Allen
Sketchers had and ad. 
Seems like addidas had one but may have not been for shoes.
Seems like addidas had one but may have not been for shoes.
This post was edited on 2/4/13 at 5:25 pm
Posted on 2/4/13 at 5:56 pm to TorNation
Nike doesn't need one. When your next biggest competitor in the market had $10 billion less in revenue than you in the previous year, you don't need to do much advertising.
Posted on 2/4/13 at 5:59 pm to Tim Taylor
Yeah, you could have said that about Nike in the 90's
Posted on 2/4/13 at 6:01 pm to Paul Allen
Nike just signed Rory and they're pairing him up with Tiger in a lot of new ads. Super Bowl ads cost like 4 million a year. They can pass on that and use their ad dollars in better spots. The impact of a SB ad would have been minimal considering the cost.
Posted on 2/4/13 at 8:50 pm to Nature Boy
What about a LeBron commercial?
Posted on 2/4/13 at 8:59 pm to Tim Taylor
quote:
Nike doesn't need one. When your next biggest competitor in the market had $10 billion less in revenue than you in the previous year, you don't need to do much advertising.
Posted on 2/4/13 at 9:09 pm to Tim Taylor
quote:
Nike doesn't need one. When your next biggest competitor in the market had $10 billion less in revenue than you in the previous year, you don't need to do much advertising.
It's never a bad idea to advertise, no matter how much of the market share you have.
Posted on 2/4/13 at 9:13 pm to brewhan davey
They did have their logo plastered all over 22 players on every snap though, so they probably figured their brand had enough air time.
Posted on 2/4/13 at 9:38 pm to brewhan davey
quote:
It's never a bad idea to advertise, no matter how much of the market share you have.
Posted on 2/4/13 at 10:02 pm to Paul Allen
quote:
quote: It's never a bad idea to advertise, no matter how much of the market share you have.
Considering their logo was on every player, coach, and person on the sideline, plus the championship shirts have the logo on them, I think they advertised plenty
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News