Started By
Message
locked post

Ray Lewis co-defendant says Atlanta killings were in self defense

Posted on 1/25/13 at 10:36 pm
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
34684 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 10:36 pm
quote:

"I can tell it like this, not that I owe (Lewis) any type of protection," Oakley said this week. "What happened, it wasn't our fault what happened. It happened, but we didn't instigate none of what happened. We had a great time and were on our way to the limousine to go back to our hotel, and those guys came out, for whatever reason. I think it was to rob (Lewis) because it was a dark alley and they were standing at the alley. I think it was just an opportunity for them to do whatever they had in mind."

Oakley, who did not testify at trial, won't say who did what but will say he believes Lewis was targeted "because of the way he was dressed" and that it all started when Lewis had a confrontation with the victims, possibly after one of them called Lewis a name.

"They exchanged words then, and it just went from there," Oakley said.


LINK
Posted by SouljaBreauxTellEm
Mizz
Member since Aug 2009
29343 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 10:38 pm to
Exactly. Why would Lewis provoke anything?
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
87632 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 10:45 pm to
Here we go again
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
98664 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 10:47 pm to
A Witness to Self Defense hopefully these threads stop now
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88509 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 10:52 pm to
Thug POS
Posted by T
Member since Jan 2004
9889 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 11:13 pm to
quote:

and that it all started when Lewis had a confrontation with the victims, possibly after one of them called Lewis a name.


Role model
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
40453 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 12:15 am to
He is such a wanna cornball bitch
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
66950 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 12:51 am to
Always easy to claim self defense, when the other person is dead.

See: Trayvon story.

No one outside the people there will really know.
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92903 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 1:03 am to
quote:

Always easy to claim self defense, when the other person is dead.

See: Trayvon story.


Did you see how fricked up Zimmerman was? That was self-defense.
Posted by TouchedTheAxeIn82
near the Apple spaceship
Member since Nov 2012
7455 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 2:50 am to
quote:

Did you see how fricked up Zimmerman was? That was self-defense.



And that's why in a confrontation with no witnesses, it's better for the other guy to be dead—so he can't defend himself. The undisputed facts are that (1) Zimmerman followed Trayvon Martin despite being advised against it by the police dispatcher over the phone, and (2) Zimmerman was armed and Martin was not. Oh also (3) Martin had purchased some items at a store and was walking back to the house where he was staying, so he was definitely not looking for trouble. Not yet established as fact (AFAIK) is the phone conversation he had with his girlfriend telling her he was being followed by some dude and expressing fear.

So the fact is, Trayvon Martin, who had a good reason to be where he was, was accosted by a guy with a gun. Are you saying Trayvon Martin didn't have the right to defend himself? As far as he was concerned he was in a fight for his life, and he lost.

The key here is that a guy with a gun created a confrontation with an unarmed man, and shot him. There is no way in hell that is self defense.

Posted by Crompdaddy8
Jimmy Rustler
Member since Nov 2009
10569 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 4:14 am to
quote:

And that's why in a confrontation with no witnesses, it's better for the other guy to be dead—so he can't defend himself. The undisputed facts are that (1) Zimmerman followed Trayvon Martin despite being advised against it by the police dispatcher over the phone, and (2) Zimmerman was armed and Martin was not. Oh also (3) Martin had purchased some items at a store and was walking back to the house where he was staying, so he was definitely not looking for trouble. Not yet established as fact (AFAIK) is the phone conversation he had with his girlfriend telling her he was being followed by some dude and expressing fear.

So the fact is, Trayvon Martin, who had a good reason to be where he was, was accosted by a guy with a gun. Are you saying Trayvon Martin didn't have the right to defend himself? As far as he was concerned he was in a fight for his life, and he lost.

The key here is that a guy with a gun created a confrontation with an unarmed man, and shot him. There is no way in hell that is self defense.


:kige:
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45219 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 6:03 am to
It's not self defense when you initiate the confrontation.
Posted by TigerBait2008
Boulder,CO
Member since Jun 2008
40491 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 6:21 am to
quote:

It's not self defense when you initiate the confrontation.



WUT?



So If you walked up to someone and initiate a conversation,let's just say defending one of your friends, and the guy pulls a knife or gun, you defend yourself and something happens to other guy, what would that be called?
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45219 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 6:33 am to
I stand by my statement.

You're trying to twist it into something else.

If you initiate the confrontation (start the fight, in other words) then you can't claim self defense.

Conversation and confrontation are two distinctly different things.
This post was edited on 1/26/13 at 6:34 am
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
81280 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 8:17 am to
quote:

So the fact is, Trayvon Martin, who had a good reason to be where he was, was accosted by a guy with a gun. Are you saying Trayvon Martin didn't have the right to defend himself? As far as he was concerned he was in a fight for his life, and he lost. The key here is that a guy with a gun created a confrontation with an unarmed man, and shot him. There is no way in hell that is self defense.


That's what a lot of people are missing. Trayvon may very well have been standing his ground. (If you want to take the racial stereotype angle, would you feel threatened if you were being watched and followed by an armed Mexican?)

Now, I wouldn't take my fists to a gunfight, but I'm a little older and wiser than Trayvon. I also don't have to worry about losing street cred if I run away from that situation.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 9:29 am to
quote:

Did you see how fricked up Zimmerman was? That was self-defense.

When you follow someone in your car and then get out of that car to pick a fight with him, that's not self-defense, that murder. If someone starts a fist-fight, they don't have a right to pull out a gun just because they're getting their arse kicked.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 9:31 am to
quote:

Now, I wouldn't take my fists to a gunfight, but I'm a little older and wiser than Trayvon. I also don't have to worry about losing street cred if I run away from that situation.

But Zimmerman was following Martin, not the other way around, and Zimmerman was the one who made the decision to get out of his car and pick a fight with Martin.
Posted by TheOcean
#honeyfriedchicken
Member since Aug 2004
46140 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 9:33 am to
quote:

It's not self defense when you initiate the confrontation.


Yup.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
81280 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 9:39 am to
quote:

But Zimmerman was following Martin, not the other way around, and Zimmerman was the one who made the decision to get out of his car and pick a fight with Martin.


True. Just saying the wise decision would have been to run.
Posted by bayou2003
Mah-zur-ree (417)
Member since Oct 2003
17646 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 10:12 am to
quote:

That's what a lot of people are missing. Trayvon may very well have been standing his ground. (If you want to take the racial stereotype angle, would you feel threatened if you were being watched and followed by an armed Mexican?)


People forget Trayvon was from Miami. A lot of Rican and Cuban gangs in Florida. If some Rican or Cuban looking guy followed me around in a vehicle and then gets out and follow me on foot I'd be thinking he was trying to rob me or something.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram