- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Upton rejects trade to Mariners
Posted on 1/10/13 at 7:23 pm to lsu31always
Posted on 1/10/13 at 7:23 pm to lsu31always
I'm not saying I want it to happen. I may or may not depending on the cost. But the braves definitely have the personnel to trade for upton.
1
Posted on 1/10/13 at 7:35 pm to motorbreath
The rumored deal was Furbush, Pryor, Franklin, and one of Walker/Paxton/Hultzen. The Braves can match that.
Posted on 1/10/13 at 7:39 pm to lsu31always
What you think of Franklin?
Posted on 1/10/13 at 7:40 pm to lsu31always
Braves don't have a stud pitcher of that caliber of hultzen/walker do they
Posted on 1/10/13 at 7:45 pm to Lester Earl
Teheran/Delgado
Posted on 1/10/13 at 7:45 pm to Lester Earl
Depends on how much you like Teheran or Delgado.
Posted on 1/10/13 at 7:46 pm to lsu31always
That's a pretty big range of the 3 pitching prospects, probably was Hultzen.
Posted on 1/10/13 at 7:47 pm to beaver
Teheran stock way down though I heard he pitched well in one of the winter leagues
Posted on 1/10/13 at 9:17 pm to Lester Earl
So why do we think he has Boston, Chicago and Toronto on his no trade list?
I mean I understand Seattle and Toronto to an extent.
I mean I understand Seattle and Toronto to an extent.
Posted on 1/10/13 at 9:18 pm to lighter345
Weirdest no trade list ever?
Posted on 1/10/13 at 9:20 pm to lighter345
Which Chicago?
Boston is a little odd
Toronto makes sense as they were no bodies before big trades
If Cubs I understand and if White Sox maybe they were included when Ozzie was still coach
Boston is a little odd
Toronto makes sense as they were no bodies before big trades
If Cubs I understand and if White Sox maybe they were included when Ozzie was still coach
Posted on 1/10/13 at 9:20 pm to tduecen
Cubs. It changes every year.
Posted on 1/10/13 at 9:23 pm to lsu31always
I hadn't even looked at his no trade clause to see the conditions. Still think for most far they devalue players but they provide them with a ton of leverage
Posted on 1/10/13 at 9:49 pm to lsu31always
quote:
Don't see the Braves having the ammo.
A not-shite team for starters.
Posted on 1/10/13 at 9:53 pm to tduecen
Was Yankees, Cubs, red sox, and Indians during 2012, Seattle was only added recently after being involved in so many rumors. Maybe Upton was only presented with the trade and hasn't been offered any compensation by Seattle to drop the no-trade yet.
Posted on 1/10/13 at 10:02 pm to floridatigah
Red Sox- Can hold out for money to waive NTC
Cubs- Can hold out for money to waive NTC
Blue Jays- Doesn't want to pay Canadian taxes?
Seattle- Pitcher friendly, would decrease FA value in a few years
Cubs- Can hold out for money to waive NTC
Blue Jays- Doesn't want to pay Canadian taxes?
Seattle- Pitcher friendly, would decrease FA value in a few years
Posted on 1/10/13 at 10:13 pm to lsu31always
Weirdest I have ever heard of.
He must have some serious hate to not want to go to Boston or Chicago. Maybe he still thinks they are racist.
He must have some serious hate to not want to go to Boston or Chicago. Maybe he still thinks they are racist.
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:02 pm to lsu31always
According to Heyman it was Walker. Now glad tbis didn't happen.
Posted on 1/11/13 at 12:18 am to floridatigah
So are the Pirates not in this at all?
They certainly have the prospects...
They certainly have the prospects...
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News