- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Need thoughts on this trade for approval
Posted on 11/14/12 at 11:01 pm
Posted on 11/14/12 at 11:01 pm
I am the commissioner and I approve trades. We used to be 2 day league vote but I switched it earlier this year because of the thursday night games and everyone wanted trades to go through before.
Well this trade was just accepted and I don't know if I can approve this thing and am considering switching it back to league vote since the players only play Sunday.
Cruz/Witten for Mcgahee/Maclin
Though I'd argue RBs carry more value, Cruz and Witten outweigh the other two by a pretty large margin to this point.
As well the team getting Cruz and Witten will be significantly better since Maclin wasn't even in his lineup and he didn't really have an all star TE.
I don't think this is vetoable, but it feels pretty one sided.
Thoughts?
Well this trade was just accepted and I don't know if I can approve this thing and am considering switching it back to league vote since the players only play Sunday.
Cruz/Witten for Mcgahee/Maclin
Though I'd argue RBs carry more value, Cruz and Witten outweigh the other two by a pretty large margin to this point.
As well the team getting Cruz and Witten will be significantly better since Maclin wasn't even in his lineup and he didn't really have an all star TE.
I don't think this is vetoable, but it feels pretty one sided.
Thoughts?
Posted on 11/14/12 at 11:03 pm to donRANDOMnumbers
no collusion=no veto
u get blops2?
u get blops2?
Posted on 11/14/12 at 11:08 pm to Honkus
Yea it needs to be obvious collusion for a veto.
Posted on 11/14/12 at 11:09 pm to Honkus
Popular
Back to top
1







