- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
USA Today now has the Cerullo Declaration
Posted on 9/18/12 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 9/18/12 at 12:51 pm
I assume we'll all see it soon.
3
Posted on 9/18/12 at 12:54 pm to clooneyisgod
CAN'T WAIT
Posted on 9/18/12 at 12:56 pm to clooneyisgod
According to mike garofolo there are some elements that do contradict what Williams declared. 
This post was edited on 9/18/12 at 12:57 pm
Posted on 9/18/12 at 1:22 pm to Swagga
quote:
Mike Garafolo ?@MikeGarafolo Biggest discrepancy: Cerullo claims he gave Williams the $10k from Vilma. Williams said he never touched any $ pledged to injure a player.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 1:23 pm to mm2316
So therefore Vilma money was not money intended to hurt another player.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 1:39 pm to Chad504boy
Cerullo said money was for Warner and then carried over to Favre.
My thought is Warner got knocked the frick out a few times, how come nobody got that money? Or did they keep it in the pot....
My thought is Warner got knocked the frick out a few times, how come nobody got that money? Or did they keep it in the pot....
Posted on 9/18/12 at 3:01 pm to Chad504boy
After reading the Cerullo declaration, it is my opinion that the NFL based its whe case on this one disgruntled employee's statement. It lays out everything the NFL has been saying. Their case is so weak, but they still have the upper hand unless court steps in.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 3:05 pm to chinesebandit76
quote:
After reading the Cerullo declaration, it is my opinion that the NFL based its whe case on this one disgruntled employee's statement. It lays out everything the NFL has been saying. Their case is so weak, but they still have the upper hand unless court steps in.
and they are bullying 3g to push cerullo's claims.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 3:36 pm to Chad504boy
So, where IS the 10 grand? This is not pocket change IF this happened?
Posted on 9/18/12 at 3:44 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
Cerullo said money was for Warner and then carried over to Favre. My thought is Warner got knocked the frick out a few times, how come nobody got that money? Or did they keep it in the pot....
I posed this question in the other thread. My guess is because Warner returned. However, 3G defined a knockout as causing a player to leave for more than one play. That happened with Warner.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 3:46 pm to 3HourTour
quote:
However, 3G defined a knockout as causing a player to leave for more than one play. That happened with Warner.
Cerullo defined differently.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 3:47 pm to Chad504boy
That's what I was getting at pal
Posted on 9/18/12 at 4:02 pm to 3HourTour
quote:
That's what I was getting at pal
I got you there faster.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 4:08 pm to mm2316
quote:
Mike Garafolo ?@MikeGarafolo Biggest discrepancy: Cerullo claims he gave Williams the $10k from Vilma. Williams said he never touched any $ pledged to injure a player.
Williams gave the money to Cerullo who then gave it to Vilma to stand up and pretend to offer the money?
All roads lead back to 3G.
This post was edited on 9/18/12 at 4:09 pm
Posted on 9/18/12 at 4:21 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
I got you there faster.
No I was there already. Just in another thread.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 4:21 pm to 3HourTour
quote:
No I was there already. Just in another thread.
You're welcome bro. You don't have to get mad at me for a little assistance.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 4:25 pm to Chad504boy
How come no player or media person has never asked why we didn't put a bounty on Peyton Manning? Also why does Cerullo's statement not mention the bounties the NFL initially claimed we had on Aaron Rodgers and Cam Newton? The league said it was a three year program but they don't talk about that anymore.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 5:01 pm to saintsfan22
quote:
Also why does Cerullo's statement not mention the bounties the NFL initially claimed we had on Aaron Rodgers and Cam Newton? The league said it was a three year program but they don't talk about that anymore.
Supposedly the harsh punishments were because they lied to the NFL and kept doing it despite being warned. Sounds more like that 3 years was BS.
The NFL and Goodell knew it wasn't anything serious, gave them a warning to stop, and sounds like they did. Then two years later being hit by concussion lawsuits he decides to exaggerate the evidence and use the Saints as a scapegoat.
This post was edited on 9/18/12 at 5:17 pm
Posted on 9/18/12 at 5:15 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
You're welcome bro. You don't have to get mad at me for a little assistance.
I'm so mad at you
Posted on 9/18/12 at 5:24 pm to clooneyisgod
Cerullo swears that Vilma had 5 grand in each hand hollering "first one to take out Warner gets it"! What a punk pussy!
This post was edited on 9/18/12 at 5:25 pm
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News