Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Cable TV Obsolescence

Posted on 7/18/12 at 2:52 pm
Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
38710 posts
Posted on 7/18/12 at 2:52 pm
LINK

Just interesting tidbits. Too broad to be striking, but better than not selling out to the cable model.
Posted by WikiTiger
Member since Sep 2007
41055 posts
Posted on 7/18/12 at 4:06 pm to
I like that you posted this. It was an interesting article. I wish I had more to contribute to this thread.

I hate the cable TV business model. I wish the media corporations would get their heads out of their asses and modernize, but they won't do it until they absolutely have to.
Posted by Tim7105
Alabama
Member since Sep 2011
337 posts
Posted on 7/18/12 at 4:13 pm to
Literally I haven't watched television in months and I am 24 until I caught media days yesterday.
Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
38710 posts
Posted on 7/18/12 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

I like that you posted this. It was an interesting article. I wish I had more to contribute to this thread.

I hate the cable TV business model. I wish the media corporations would get their heads out of their asses and modernize, but they won't do it until they absolutely have to.


I know I know I was short in my response to the article. I posted in the middle of an insane workday, but yeah.

I mean, I'm sure few media outlets are ready to call a spade a spade and rat out the inefficiency of the current television cable monopoly (both in practice and in structure). Most of media's money relies on well, television, and since most of America is on cable, yeah.

The recent "you didn't build this debate," did get me thinking though. One of the usual defenses for the cable companies (even from some on this board) is the "Cable companies built the infrastructure, why shouldn't they make money off of it," when referencing download speeds/bandwith/etc. Well... how much do construction companies make off of roads and the businesses that use them for commerce?
Posted by Srbtiger06
Member since Apr 2006
29305 posts
Posted on 7/18/12 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

The recent "you didn't build this debate," did get me thinking though. One of the usual defenses for the cable companies (even from some on this board) is the "Cable companies built the infrastructure, why shouldn't they make money off of it," when referencing download speeds/bandwith/etc. Well... how much do construction companies make off of roads and the businesses that use them for commerce?


I see what you're saying, but individuals don't pay for upkeep directly for those. When maintenance and upkeep are needed, government pays...not users.

Also when roads are built, the company is (in theory) paid upfront/on completion. Cable companies have to invest first and recoup after. They can't make money without any means to deliver their product.
Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
38710 posts
Posted on 7/18/12 at 5:56 pm to
quote:

I see what you're saying, but individuals don't pay for upkeep directly for those. When maintenance and upkeep are needed, government pays...not users.


Point.

quote:

Also when roads are built, the company is (in theory) paid upfront/on completion. Cable companies have to invest first and recoup after. They can't make money without any means to deliver their product.


Again, part of the model change that cable companies can start to consider.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram