- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Mega-Lawsuit Says NFL Hid Brain Injury
Posted on 6/7/12 at 9:31 am
Posted on 6/7/12 at 9:31 am
LINK
It all makes sense now Goodell.
quote:
Lawyers for former players say more than 80 pending lawsuits are consolidated in the "master complaint" filed Thursday in Philadelphia.
It all makes sense now Goodell.
Posted on 6/7/12 at 10:10 am to Mouth
Assinine.........these players knew what they were getting into. Did they not see what happened to boxers after years of getting beaten in the head?
Also, how can you pinpoint the danger back to professional football? Who's to say the players didn't get hurt in Pop Warner, High School, or College.......The former players trying to make this money can go F themselves. Nobody forced these guys to play.
Also, how can you pinpoint the danger back to professional football? Who's to say the players didn't get hurt in Pop Warner, High School, or College.......The former players trying to make this money can go F themselves. Nobody forced these guys to play.
Posted on 6/7/12 at 11:10 am to TJG210
quote:
Also, how can you pinpoint the danger back to professional football? Who's to say the players didn't get hurt in Pop Warner, High School, or College.......The former players trying to make this money can go F themselves. Nobody forced these guys to play.
This
Posted on 6/7/12 at 9:26 pm to Mouth
Stupid lawsuit. Leech lawyers though see another collection of blood.
Too bad for them...
"In January, a second NIOSH report again found that NFL players were outliving their non-NFL cohort, partly due to lower cancer rates that could be the result of their lower rate of smoking. NIOSH also found that former players were at a decreased risk of dying from heart disease (with the exception of players who had a high body mass index). And the rate of suicide among NFL vets was 59% lower than in the general population. Overall, for the 3,439 ex--NFL players in the more recent study, NIOSH "projected 625 deaths, using nonathlete mortality rates, but observed only 334 (chart).
LINK
Too bad for them...
"In January, a second NIOSH report again found that NFL players were outliving their non-NFL cohort, partly due to lower cancer rates that could be the result of their lower rate of smoking. NIOSH also found that former players were at a decreased risk of dying from heart disease (with the exception of players who had a high body mass index). And the rate of suicide among NFL vets was 59% lower than in the general population. Overall, for the 3,439 ex--NFL players in the more recent study, NIOSH "projected 625 deaths, using nonathlete mortality rates, but observed only 334 (chart).
LINK
Posted on 6/7/12 at 9:35 pm to Jake88
Lawyers aren't interested in deaths nearly as much as they are interested in disabled clients who have long-term serious damages and/or need long-term care. We all know why...
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
The dirty little secret in PI cases is that in many cases fatalities aren't worth near as much as disabilities, pain and suffering, etc.
Therefore IMO the plaintiffs are going to make this case mainly about brain damage and disabilities, something that's going to have a hefty price tag. If they can show that the NFL even slightly skewed or hid any data, the potential that a jury will get reeeally po'ed and take the league to the woodshed is very real.
I expect in the end this will get settled out of court. Right now the sides are maneuvering to figure out how much that settlement should be (in their opinion).
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
The dirty little secret in PI cases is that in many cases fatalities aren't worth near as much as disabilities, pain and suffering, etc.
Therefore IMO the plaintiffs are going to make this case mainly about brain damage and disabilities, something that's going to have a hefty price tag. If they can show that the NFL even slightly skewed or hid any data, the potential that a jury will get reeeally po'ed and take the league to the woodshed is very real.
I expect in the end this will get settled out of court. Right now the sides are maneuvering to figure out how much that settlement should be (in their opinion).
Posted on 6/7/12 at 10:01 pm to Mouth
So now that all the current players know the risks, what percentage of players are choosing not to play this year?
Posted on 6/8/12 at 5:47 am to tigerskin
Well, we have seen a few guys retire rather early in their careers already...
But the problem is not the assumption of risk by the players--coal miners assume a risk while mining. Rather, the claim is that the league, like the companies who run coal mines, did not take the necessary precautions to minimize the risk for their employees.
I know that many of you are irrationally anti-labor, but the law is not on your side, which is a good thing, IMO.
But the problem is not the assumption of risk by the players--coal miners assume a risk while mining. Rather, the claim is that the league, like the companies who run coal mines, did not take the necessary precautions to minimize the risk for their employees.
I know that many of you are irrationally anti-labor, but the law is not on your side, which is a good thing, IMO.
Posted on 6/8/12 at 9:03 am to Sophandros
What precautions can they take to minimize the risks? Yes, they shouldn't put guys back in right after a concussion and they will get tougher on that. But in the end, I think the outcomes are going to be the same unless the game is fundamentally changed. I just think like most lawsuits it's a money grab. Less than 1% will decide not to play football this year.
This post was edited on 6/8/12 at 9:04 am
Popular
Back to top
4






