Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Mega-Lawsuit Says NFL Hid Brain Injury

Posted on 6/7/12 at 9:31 am
Posted by Mouth
Member since Jan 2008
23081 posts
Posted on 6/7/12 at 9:31 am
LINK

quote:

Lawyers for former players say more than 80 pending lawsuits are consolidated in the "master complaint" filed Thursday in Philadelphia.


It all makes sense now Goodell.
Posted by hg
Member since Jun 2009
128340 posts
Posted on 6/7/12 at 9:45 am to
Calm down turbo
Posted by TJG210
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2006
29428 posts
Posted on 6/7/12 at 10:10 am to
Assinine.........these players knew what they were getting into. Did they not see what happened to boxers after years of getting beaten in the head?

Also, how can you pinpoint the danger back to professional football? Who's to say the players didn't get hurt in Pop Warner, High School, or College.......The former players trying to make this money can go F themselves. Nobody forced these guys to play.
Posted by XxxSpooky1
A place in SE La
Member since Sep 2007
5164 posts
Posted on 6/7/12 at 11:10 am to
quote:

Also, how can you pinpoint the danger back to professional football? Who's to say the players didn't get hurt in Pop Warner, High School, or College.......The former players trying to make this money can go F themselves. Nobody forced these guys to play.




This
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
80182 posts
Posted on 6/7/12 at 9:26 pm to
Stupid lawsuit. Leech lawyers though see another collection of blood.

Too bad for them...

"In January, a second NIOSH report again found that NFL players were outliving their non-NFL cohort, partly due to lower cancer rates that could be the result of their lower rate of smoking. NIOSH also found that former players were at a decreased risk of dying from heart disease (with the exception of players who had a high body mass index). And the rate of suicide among NFL vets was 59% lower than in the general population. Overall, for the 3,439 ex--NFL players in the more recent study, NIOSH "projected 625 deaths, using nonathlete mortality rates, but observed only 334 (chart).

LINK
Posted by kclsufan
Show Me
Member since Jun 2008
12101 posts
Posted on 6/7/12 at 9:35 pm to
Lawyers aren't interested in deaths nearly as much as they are interested in disabled clients who have long-term serious damages and/or need long-term care. We all know why...

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

The dirty little secret in PI cases is that in many cases fatalities aren't worth near as much as disabilities, pain and suffering, etc.

Therefore IMO the plaintiffs are going to make this case mainly about brain damage and disabilities, something that's going to have a hefty price tag. If they can show that the NFL even slightly skewed or hid any data, the potential that a jury will get reeeally po'ed and take the league to the woodshed is very real.

I expect in the end this will get settled out of court. Right now the sides are maneuvering to figure out how much that settlement should be (in their opinion).
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
46819 posts
Posted on 6/7/12 at 10:01 pm to
So now that all the current players know the risks, what percentage of players are choosing not to play this year?
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45219 posts
Posted on 6/8/12 at 5:47 am to
Well, we have seen a few guys retire rather early in their careers already...

But the problem is not the assumption of risk by the players--coal miners assume a risk while mining. Rather, the claim is that the league, like the companies who run coal mines, did not take the necessary precautions to minimize the risk for their employees.

I know that many of you are irrationally anti-labor, but the law is not on your side, which is a good thing, IMO.
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
46819 posts
Posted on 6/8/12 at 9:03 am to
What precautions can they take to minimize the risks? Yes, they shouldn't put guys back in right after a concussion and they will get tougher on that. But in the end, I think the outcomes are going to be the same unless the game is fundamentally changed. I just think like most lawsuits it's a money grab. Less than 1% will decide not to play football this year.
This post was edited on 6/8/12 at 9:04 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram