- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Tannehill or Weeden?
Posted on 5/1/12 at 2:43 pm
Posted on 5/1/12 at 2:43 pm
Our league plays two QBs and also has a rookie draft where we pick one rookie that must be on the team that year and have an option on him the following years. As u can see starting two Qbs in a 10 team league and some are locked on other teams QBs are very valuable.
I have 5th pick in rookie draft and these two guys should be available. Any preference? I'm thinking Weeden but really don't know. Shame I'll probably have to pass on a rb like Martin to take one of these losers.
I have 5th pick in rookie draft and these two guys should be available. Any preference? I'm thinking Weeden but really don't know. Shame I'll probably have to pass on a rb like Martin to take one of these losers.
1
Posted on 5/1/12 at 10:11 pm to CAT
Weeden: Neither team has elite WRs, but Richardson should make life a lot easier for him.
ETA: Matt Moore was a servicable starting QB last year and Tannehill may not start right away. Colt McCoy, OTOH, is a backup at best.
ETA: Matt Moore was a servicable starting QB last year and Tannehill may not start right away. Colt McCoy, OTOH, is a backup at best.
This post was edited on 5/1/12 at 10:13 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News