QB sacks on JL and JJ

quote:

---

Seems like JL saw the field and was a little more effective getting rid of the ball and negative plays if you look at that stat alone.

---

I attribute this on account of him not being a horrible quarterback

When a QB establishes the pass, then the rush wanes and the offense turns productive.

Unreal that Les though the QB was supposed to run. i think this kind of obvious idiocy is what has all the tiger faithful losing their shite.

It's as if the guy came out to the mic and announced that the sky was orange. Everyone knows its not and trust is lost...

Everyone wanted to say JJ was the safer QB, but both cost their team in his own way.

but jj can ruuuuuunnnnnn!!!!!

quote:

---

14 sacks in 6 games for JJ

4 for Lee in 8.

nuff said.

---

or in other words:

0.5 sack/game for Lee.

2.33 sacks/game for JJ.

in other other words:

4 in 171 passing attempts for Lee (2.3%) or

14 in 114 passing attempts for JJ (12.3%)

So that means JJ was 5.25 times as likely to get sacked on a passing play then Lee.

Lee also threw 3 INTs in 171 passing attempts (1.75%)

While JJ threw 2 INTs in 114 passing attempts (1.75%)

Ironically, the exact same interception ratio.