Started By
Message

re: LSU has faced 3 of the nations top 5 rushers

Posted on 12/18/11 at 10:52 am to
Posted by DucksflyinPAC
Portland, Oregon
Member since Mar 2011
1872 posts
Posted on 12/18/11 at 10:52 am to
quote:

We've heard it all season, starting with you Oregon fans, LSU didn't win, ya'll just made too many mistakes.

I never once implied or said LSU did not win vs us. Scoreboards do not lie. I am not like a average SEC fan that pretends if a team gets more yards vs another-they really won the game. I go by a scoreboard, as the rules state to determine a winner.

I never have at one single time tried in any way to rob LSU of their win vs us. All I did was simply point out reasons for such a loss(because Rantards were being retarded with silly claims). I know to Rantards that difference is hard to accept and a Rantard just assumes things. Try to actually read my words better next time and understand what and why I am saying something would ya and not just assume things?
Posted by Elleshoe
Wade’s World
Member since Jun 2004
143616 posts
Posted on 12/18/11 at 10:59 am to
quote:


LMJ of Oregon did not play the whole virtual second half and some of the first half because of getting nasty craps and a ankle injury due to having it stepped on bad. Thus we will never know how many yards he would of got vs you if he had been able to play and not be injured...





we made his bitch arse quit.
Posted by chimneylooker
Nashville
Member since Sep 2011
561 posts
Posted on 12/18/11 at 11:02 am to
quote:

we made his bitch arse quit.


What position do you play?
Posted by Random LSU Hero
2014 NFL Survivor Champion (17-0)
Member since Aug 2011
9431 posts
Posted on 12/18/11 at 11:06 am to
quote:

DrTyger



Keep up the good work
Posted by DucksflyinPAC
Portland, Oregon
Member since Mar 2011
1872 posts
Posted on 12/18/11 at 11:07 am to
quote:

On 18 carries. 3 yards per fricking carry. That's how.

You are a moron. Forget how many carries he had. He still got 54 yards in only playing 1.5 quarters out of 4 quarters. That leaves 2.5 quarters he did not play. Simple logic says he would of got even more yards by playing the other 2.5.

You do not watch much Oregon football I can tell. If you did, you would know that LMJ turns it way up, WAY up in the second half. Why is not so much really about him. Why is because we turn on our Blurr mode more often then. And even more Teams are so worn down in the 2nd half by our fast pace blurr, we catch them off guard and out of breath and LMJ goes off on tons of big plays then. Most every game in the first half teams shut him down. What you did with LSU vs him is the norm for almost every team in the first half. Try watching more UO football and you would get this fact. Nothing new buddy. But there is a reason we most often beat teams by 30 points or more. LMJ is a huge part of that for us. And in 2nd half of games he gets huge yardage.

It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out having a team miss the Nations Rushing leader, who always creates big plays in second half, that he would of got some more yards had he played in the 2nd half.

You really should give this up. You are in over your head...
Posted by DucksflyinPAC
Portland, Oregon
Member since Mar 2011
1872 posts
Posted on 12/18/11 at 11:14 am to
quote:

Oh and he was in on the very first possession of the 3rd quarter too. Interesting method of saying 1.5 quarters. And you scored 13 points in a half with James playing. So how many more points do you score in the 2nd half with him?

That is why earlier I clarified my words of not playing in the second half as "Virtual". If you could read, you might of seen me say that. Virtual as in yes LMJ did play in the 2nd half but only for the very first play- a kickoff return. It was only a test to see if was better. He came limping off the field and did not play anymore after...

So yeah, him playing 5 seconds of the second half, which is like 99.7 percent of not playing can easily be called not playing in the second half.

You guys sure like to spin things. You really should drop this...
Posted by DrTyger
Covington
Member since Oct 2009
22325 posts
Posted on 12/18/11 at 11:15 am to
You are a moron.

He got only 3 yards a carry! How is that not getting through your head! I don't care if he got 300 yards, if it took 100 carries to get it that not good run production. Especially if the dude averages 7 yards a carry on the year.

He's averaging 150 a game. He would have needed 50 carries to get that at a 3 yard per carry average.

Stop harping on how many yards he got in such few time. Whoop de fricking doo. He took a lot of carries to get it.

Let me repeat myself to make sure you get it.

3 yds/carry
3 yds/carry
3 yds/carry
3 yds/carry
























3 yds/carry
Posted by chimneylooker
Nashville
Member since Sep 2011
561 posts
Posted on 12/18/11 at 11:18 am to
quote:

He still got 54 yards in only playing 1.5 quarters out of 4 quarters.


I call BS. According to espn he had a rush late in the 4th.

Try again

Espn
Posted by philcfree
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2011
69 posts
Posted on 12/18/11 at 11:22 am to
quote:

You really should give this up. You are in over your head...



you said it yourself.
Posted by MFn GIMP
Member since Feb 2011
19260 posts
Posted on 12/18/11 at 11:26 am to
quote:

That is why earlier I clarified my words of not playing in the second half as "Virtual". If you could read, you might of seen me say that. Virtual as in yes LMJ did play in the 2nd half but only for the very first play- a kickoff return. It was only a test to see if was better. He came limping off the field and did not play anymore after...


Wrong. He actually had Oregon's first carry from scrimmage in the 2nd half/ And i'm still interested in how playing the entire 1st half and the very beginning of the 2nd half is 1.5 quarters. It is half the game at least.
This post was edited on 12/18/11 at 11:33 am
Posted by TexasTiger1185
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2011
13069 posts
Posted on 12/18/11 at 11:35 am to
I'm afraid I don't understand the Duck logic here. If your player hadn't gotten hurt other players wouldn't have fumbled and we would not have scored any points? For the record if a team turns the ball over and it turns into points, taking away the turnover doesn't exactly equate to 0 points. There is still a likelyhood that the team who turned it over would have punted later in that drive, giving LSU a chance to score.

Also LMJ could have fumbled, your implying that is impossible for LSU to strip LMJ. It isn't. Lastly using injuries as an excuse for losing a game is dumb. There is a reason why teams have 4 or 5 running backs on their team. So if one gets hurt another can step in. Whose fault is it if the backup players can't hold on to a football? Maybe your coach should recruit better backup players. Or maybe your training staff should prepare your team for the first game of the year. Cramping in the first game of the year...isn't Oregon supposed to be this high flying fast offense that runs a play every 12 seconds or something. Can't do that with cramps
Posted by filmmaker45
Member since Mar 2008
14554 posts
Posted on 12/18/11 at 11:36 am to
DucksFlyinPAC was one of the posters who talked trash the entire week leading up to the game. After the game, didn't come back to this forum for WEEKS.

Posted by DucksflyinPAC
Portland, Oregon
Member since Mar 2011
1872 posts
Posted on 12/18/11 at 11:37 am to
quote:

LMJ is a product of his offense. He is a decent back. He is a great back for that hurry up offense. Look at his stats last year against TENN. He barely had what 25 yds. in the first half against them and then when Tenn. got wore down "the pace of your offense" he was successful. The only difference in our game is our players didn't wear down. We made him quit. Spin it however you would like, but I gurantee your coach wouldn't want to schedule us again.

You dont know jack shite, but that is ok. I am here to educate.

Our running backs coach, who has been with Oregon around 30 years give or take... said LMJ is by far the best back he has coached. That is saying a lot because UO has been RB university for a long time now. I think we have like 7 or so RB's playing right now in the NFL. So our coaches statement says a lot.

He is actually a incredible back, but yes there is much truth in what you say. He is incredible in so far as he fits our system like a T. And yes, our hurry up was a major major cause of his success. Plus having a good O-line, or our system the way we block has a part in it too. I would not deny LMJ is a great system player but may not do well under another system. But does it matter? With us, he helped lead us to a Rose Bowl, a Natty, and now another Rose Bowl.

And if LMJ were to come back next year(which he probably will not) he would easily break the records for best all time rusher in the PAC. And that says a lot when you look at who is up there.

You are wrong in saying LMJ quit. He never quit. he got injured. Big difference.

I do not spin things as per your claim, sorry. I enjoy telling the truth...

You are wrong in saying our coach would not want to schedule you again. For at UO we thrive in tough OOC's. We love good challenges. We like to face the best programs to measure ourselves with. If we lose, oh well. We play anybody, anytime. The problem is hardly anyone wants to play us OOC. KSU, UGA weaseled out of contracts with us for home/homes. Tenn has been trying VERY hard to weasel out on their return trip with us at our house in 2013. Our problem is that teams to not want to play us because they know they could lose. Even your LSU.... Oregon wanted badly do schedule a home/home with you all. LSU was against it and did a (cough, cough) neutral site in Dallas this year. Yeah, so neutral that Dallas has the 2nd most concentration of LSU alums in the country. And look how far Texas is from Oregon where as Texas boarders LA for you.

The fact is, you will see Chip Kelly desire to play anyone at any time. Same with our AD. And we could really use some better competition because next year we play 3 completely joke schools. They are all such a joke that it would make the SEC teams jealous when they see our OOC schedule next year. AT UO, we hate easy schedules with a passion, so this upsets us greatly seeing such. However we were forced to because KSU backed out and it left us hanging. We always try to play a grade A school, Grade B, and Grade C school every year if not better then that. But it is getting super hard to find any good schools that want to risk losing to us to play us.

The truth is, if you called your AD he would never ever desire to play us at our house. But go ahead, call him. Try to get a home/home with him. I know my people would jump at it. And maybe you can get something hooked up as I want to badly visit TS and sample some Cajun food as I have never had any before and I hear it is good.
Posted by filmmaker45
Member since Mar 2008
14554 posts
Posted on 12/18/11 at 11:38 am to
I love posters who use the word "rantard" which is many posters here and this guy, so completely wrong.
Posted by bayoutiger
Maurepas,louisiana
Member since Sep 2003
691 posts
Posted on 12/18/11 at 11:38 am to
oh and LSU had some players that was the first time being on the football field also,and in the 4th quarter lsu had there 3rd string in,and yeah your RB had a good year with the teams they played.Don't watch the game,I could care less,the ratings will still be great...
Posted by Douboy
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2007
4332 posts
Posted on 12/18/11 at 11:41 am to
Wow, you are still at it. You are not doing yourself or your team any favors this morning.

You should go down to Rennies or The Cooler, have some breakfast (including a bloody beer) and sulk with another group of Duck fans about how good your team could or should have been.
Posted by stapuffmarshy
lower 9
Member since Apr 2010
17507 posts
Posted on 12/18/11 at 11:42 am to
Jeebus H Christ with the Oregon fans and their butthurt about the beatdown to start the season



dude shouldn't ya'll be getting ready for your annual bowl failure?????


leave the winning championships to LSU, it's what we do
Posted by filmmaker45
Member since Mar 2008
14554 posts
Posted on 12/18/11 at 11:47 am to
They like to talk a ton of noise for having never won a damn thing outside of their PAC titles.
Posted by stapuffmarshy
lower 9
Member since Apr 2010
17507 posts
Posted on 12/18/11 at 11:49 am to
It's unreal


I never thought Bama could be passed as far as delusional fan bases but we've got some renegades coming from the outside
Posted by DucksflyinPAC
Portland, Oregon
Member since Mar 2011
1872 posts
Posted on 12/18/11 at 11:50 am to
quote:

You can stop with the stupidity at any time. There is a difference between quick and fast. LMJ is quick and less fast.

True, there is a difference between quick and fast as I myself was a slow runner on my team.(as far as 100 yard dash times) However I was one of the quickest. But you failed to mention that some people can be both fast and quick. One does not need to be only one or the other. That logic is absurd. James is both fast and quick.

And I can tell you do not follow CFB much as anybody that knows anything knows he is one of the fastest in the game. Many unbiased media types or writers have called him THEE single fastest. And I am talking 100 yard dash times or 40 yard dash times. The only guy that I can think of that might be able to beat LMJ in a race would be that WR from Florida, that track star. But keep in mind, LMJ is also a track star himself...And played on the Oregon track team, a track team, and school which is called Track Town USA, where Nike was born, where they host the Olympic trials every year time. Dude, learn something, then come talk...
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram