Started By
Message

re: BCS: discussion and breakdown - UPDATED

Posted on 11/20/11 at 12:07 am to
Posted by lsumatt
Austin
Member since Feb 2005
12812 posts
Posted on 11/20/11 at 12:07 am to
quote:

Road win for Arkansas over us would drop us to a tie with Arkansas in the CPUs at best.


Based on what? Unless a bunch of games go poorly next week, this is very unlikely
This post was edited on 11/20/11 at 12:09 am
Posted by GeauxDT
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
3654 posts
Posted on 11/20/11 at 12:09 am to
All of these possible scenarios are giving me a headache thinkin about them. It really doesn't matter that much to me as long as LSU wins out, as long as Bama isn't in the game without winning their conference, even their division.

If this season doesn't scream playoff, I don't know what else it would take.
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
36807 posts
Posted on 11/20/11 at 12:12 am to
quote:

it just seems unlikely voters would ever put Arkansas above a Bama team that beat them by 24
And as much as the media (some voters) hype up the drama, they wanted this power after 2003. LSU-OU v. LSU-USC.

In 2007 they sat back, thought about it and jumped LSU up 4 spots to #2. (Think that's accurate)

This season is no different except after 11 games LSU is unanimous #1 in Harris and Coaches and will be in computers (were not prior to OSU loss).

Computers will now continue to love LSU and voters will take their charge.
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64581 posts
Posted on 11/20/11 at 12:12 am to
Nobody is beating us. Nobody. fixed it.

Bring Bama back if they want too. I like our team.


Posted by ShermanTxTiger
Broussard, La
Member since Oct 2007
10835 posts
Posted on 11/20/11 at 12:12 am to
Ok St loses and falls one sot in the BCS. Sounds familiar. Okie state did lose on the road. That counts for something (And in OT Too!)
Posted by souldog
Johnstown, PA
Member since Jul 2007
1014 posts
Posted on 11/20/11 at 12:13 am to
Matt, thanks for all your hard work and thoughtful opinions. Remember for every one goofball prediction based on emotion or whatever there are hundreds of considered opinions who appreciate your sound reasoning.



Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
28225 posts
Posted on 11/20/11 at 12:18 am to
What if Va Tech wins out? I understand that the ACC is waaay down, but they would be a one loss conf champ who did something none of the other 1 loss champs did, avenge their only loss (Clemson). The unpredictable thing is that while the human polls from week to week during the season are basically reactionary from that particular week's results, the final reg season poll seems to be where the voters truly evaluate each teams "full body" of work (see LSU in 2007). Is it unrealistic to see the final human polls as LSU #1, Va Tech #2 OSU #3. Bama #4? (2 of those would be conf champs) I just look at 2007 when LSU jumped from #7 over UGA who started the day as #4.
Posted by SuperRemo
UK
Member since Feb 2011
2423 posts
Posted on 11/20/11 at 12:19 am to
quote:

All of these possible scenarios are giving me a headache thinkin about them. It really doesn't matter that much to me as long as LSU wins out, as long as Bama isn't in the game without winning their conference, even their division.

If this season doesn't scream playoff, I don't know what else it would take.




What will scream playoff would be lsu losing to ark the season ending with
1.bama
2 ark
3 lsu

and the other confs being shut out of the title game b/c 3 tops teams only lost to each other....

that would end the bcs
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
36807 posts
Posted on 11/20/11 at 12:21 am to
quote:

What if Va Tech wins out?
Most likely doesnt matter.
quote:

the final reg season poll seems to be where the voters truly evaluate each teams "full body" of work
Which is why LSU is on good shape regardless and VT is not. Plus CPUs
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
36807 posts
Posted on 11/20/11 at 12:23 am to
Matt,

Question for you:

How does OSU and OU loss affect the Big12 computer conference ranking?
Posted by motorbreath
New Orleans Saints fan
Member since Jun 2004
6381 posts
Posted on 11/20/11 at 12:24 am to
Potential BCSCG opponents if LSU wins out:
Bama
OSU
VT
Stanford

If I were a voter choosing between multiple 1-loss teams I would use conference title winners as my tie breaker which would leave OSU and Virginia Tech(potentially)...But that's just me.

But how cool would it be if we beat bama twice in the same year to win the NT and deny them one. Braggin rights over those morons for a year would be priceless.
Posted by lsumatt
Austin
Member since Feb 2005
12812 posts
Posted on 11/20/11 at 12:27 am to
quote:

How does OSU and OU loss affect the Big12 computer conference ranking?


Not much, if any. Conference strength is based on how you perform Out of Conference. The Big 12 is an amazing 27-3 with some nice wins and no bad losses. A Big 12 team beating a Big 12 team doesn't make that conference stronger or weaker.

However, the computers favor teams that are "top heavy". you are are better off playing 5 9-1 teams and 5 1-9 teams than playing a bunch of 5-5 teams. So if you are Ok State and you played both TT and OU, you would rather OU hav won that game so you have elite wins on your resume.

make sense?
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
36807 posts
Posted on 11/20/11 at 12:28 am to
quote:

how cool would it be if we beat bama twice in the same year to win the NT and deny them one
They would still claim the NC. It's Bama.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
28225 posts
Posted on 11/20/11 at 12:32 am to
I agree LSU seems to be in "good" shape, but it seems like the unwritten rule has been that you have to win your conf champ to get in. The two biggest controversies were in 2001 and 2003 when two teams that didn't win their conf made it to the champ game. Potentially, we are looking at 2006 all over again. Michigan, who started the day ranked ahead of UF, ultimately got jumped with the previaling rationale that they (even though the only lost by 3 pts. to #1) were left out because they didn't win their conf.
Posted by Geaux2002
Member since Jun 2011
3561 posts
Posted on 11/20/11 at 12:40 am to
Do some of you people blowing Arky realize that their best OOC win is a 6-5 Texas A&M team?

LSU has a 7-3 WVU on the road and 9-2 Oregon at a neutral site. WKU is 6-5 too.

Arkansas has A&M (6-5), New Mexico (1-10), and Troy (3-7) and Missouri State as a shitty FCS team.

Bama will have PSU (9-2), North Texas (4-7), Kent State (5-6), and Georgia Southern (FCS).

The only advantage Arky has is USCe.

Since all have Tennessee, remove them.

The only remaining different teams are:

LSU: UF (6-5), UK (4-7)
Bama: UF (6-5), Vandy (5-6)
Arky: USCe (9-2), Vandy (5-6)

This is why LSU, even with a loss to Arky will reamin the highest of the 3 in the computers:

None common opponents records with favorites winning next week:

LSU = 35 - 24

Bama = 31 - 28

Arky = 26 - 32

All the rest will be even except Bama's win against it's one loss team will be at home, while Arky and LSU would've run on the road.

Posted by Me Bite
A.K.A. - Bite Me
Member since Oct 2007
7148 posts
Posted on 11/20/11 at 12:41 am to
quote:

I agree LSU seems to be in "good" shape, but it seems like the unwritten rule has been that you have to win your conf champ to get in. The two biggest controversies were in 2001 and 2003 when two teams that didn't win their conf made it to the champ game. Potentially, we are looking at 2006 all over again. Michigan, who started the day ranked ahead of UF, ultimately got jumped with the previaling rationale that they (even though the only lost by 3 pts. to #1) were left out because they didn't win their conf.


This won't be the case if OU beats OSU. If OSU wins then maybe they get in the NC game.
This post was edited on 11/20/11 at 12:42 am
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
36807 posts
Posted on 11/20/11 at 12:42 am to
quote:

Michigan, who started the day ranked ahead of UF, ultimately got jumped with the previaling rationale that they (even though the only lost by 3 pts. to #1) were left out because they didn't win their conf.
It was the rematch factor as well.

UM lost "close" but really got handled by OSU regular season. UF won "ugly" the whole year.

IMO, that's when the voters decided to take body of work and their charge. It also allowed "ugly" SEC teams to show their dominance. Remember AU got left out in 2004 (not exactly correlative), but does count.

The debate in 2006 was rematch over SEC.
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
36807 posts
Posted on 11/20/11 at 12:43 am to
quote:

make sense?
Completely. Thanks.
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
36807 posts
Posted on 11/20/11 at 12:44 am to
quote:

Do some of you people blowing Arky
Who would that be?
Posted by Geaux2002
Member since Jun 2011
3561 posts
Posted on 11/20/11 at 12:50 am to
This season is a lot more like 2003 than 2001 if LSU beats Arky. Their computer score at that point will be so strong, it will take a lot to not have them in the title game. Also, Their computer score will stay above Bama should they lose in the SEC CG.

It would just be that season on crack since you'd basically have 2 teams that didn't win their conference at #1 and #3 in the computers almost certainly.
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 36
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 36Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram