re: Briles isn't "untouchable"

quote:

---

But there still seems to be a clarity issue."

---

Exactly why i asked the question. UH thinks he is toxic too. Clarity issue...hmmm...wonder why there is a clarity issue here. If he's such a great person then why not just hire him?

Thanks for that link. Funny how you left out every single detail in the article until you found one snippet you chose to make it fit your narrative. Why don't you read this:

quote:

---

When's the last time a university put out a statement disputing reports it's even considering a particular coaching candidate? When has a school publicly said absolutely, positively no to an alum who played at the university and succeeded as a coach there?
Houston's statement Saturday ruling out Art Briles as a candidate was necessary for the university. For Briles, these 50 words show definitively he isn't getting a college job anytime soon, if ever.
"Earlier this week Art Briles expressed interest to me regarding the Houston head coach position," Houston athletic director Hunter Yurachek said in a statement. "After discussion with University of Houston leadership, we developed a list of candidates to be interviewed that did not include Art. At this time, we will have no further comment on potential candidates or timeline."
Briles' role in the sexual assault scandal at Baylor is so toxic that his alma mater understandably moved quickly to shed him from the coaching search. Good for Houston president Renu Khator and Yurachek, who overruled board chair Tilman Fertitta's interest to interview Briles, according to ESPN. (Fertitta told SB Nation he did not support Briles. "There was a consensus decision that he would not be on the list of coaches considered to replace Herman," Fertitta said. "If I wanted to interview him, he would've been interviewed.")
Less than a month ago, Baylor said Briles and former athletic director Ian McCaw were informed of a female athlete's allegations of a gang rape by five football players, and none passed along the information to proper authorities, as required by federal law.
Feritta's comments last week to The Houston Chronicle and his pressure to get Briles may ultimately hurt Briles more than staying silent. After an ESPN report that Houston would interview Briles, the school was forced to make a definitive statement. It was a statement many people have privately thought regarding Briles' chances to coach again and now will publicly stick with him for a long time.

---

So UH knows he shouldn't be interviewed but LSU should be dumb enough to do it?

Why don't we just appoint Ensminger OC? Let's get this shite show on steroids so all of you can whine next year about how we don't have an offense, "Uh, what's going on, did we hire Miles back?" Yep, I can hear the whining now. But some are comfortable with 8-4 every year. If that's the case, we should have just kept Miles and enjoyed getting drunk pre-game....

quote:

---

Plenty of other people out there to hire.

---

I felt that way about HC as well and it didn't happen. I'm fully preparing myself for a cluster**** hire at OC...

quote:

---

So, you're simply saying its okay to give him all of the contact with the program, but don't give him a label?

---

Nope didn't say that at all. That's your lack of reading comprehension trying to spin things. I said they aren't the same title/position which is true. I also said why would we want to resort to being on the same level as auburn. So no i never said we should or i approved of hiring him as a consultant for any team. I said the job descriptions are different, and my point was we were talking about him being offered an OC position somewhere, which he hasn't.

quote:

---

You've relied on very WRONG accusations, and been persuaded these WRONG accusations are absolutely the truth, and now that they've been broken down, you've resorted to illogical points. Bravo, might as well admit you're just buying the WRONG information and you lazily accepted it as fact.

---

Please clarify what wrong information i have, and provide me with the evidence i am indeed wrong. I mean i am just going off of what the law firm who investigated the scandal noted.

Holy shite! I just realized you're the moron who started the "Canada would be a terrible OC thread" a while back. I embarrassed you because you did no research on him and made baseless claims about how he sucked when you had only read one paragraph in Wikipedia AND linked it! Lmao.

Wow! I can't believe i wasted all this time talking to you again. You got your feelings hurt in your last thread and are now trying to lash out at me.

Good to know you aren't a new idiot popping up on here. Just an old one spouting dumber shite.

Bye bye!

quote:

---

frick you for making ignoring rape acceptable you compete piece of shite. Any of y'all that want briles deserve to burn in hell.

---

We need you to really open up and share your true feelings on the matter...

It's not for you to judge

LINK

Actually u seem pretty miserable yourself. I doubt u have any known facts to spit all this hate out. He may be guilty of a cover up but what if he's not? Isn't innocent Untill proven guilty ? So instead of saying we all deserve to go to hell why don't u gfy instead