CFB Realignment Based On Program Strength? | TigerDroppings.com
Sports Forums
LSU Football
Discuss LSU Sports with fellow Tiger fans
LSU Recruiting
Discuss the future of LSU sports
SEC Football
Mingle with SEC fans from all schools
New Orleans Saints
Discuss the Saints with fellow Who Dats
New Orleans Pelicans
Get the latest info on the Pelicans
Pro sports
Discuss NFL, NBA, MLB, NCAA and more
Fantasy Football
Read this board, dominate your league
Soccer
Discuss the world's most popular sport
More Forums
Off-Topic Board
Abandon all hope, ye who enter here
Tech Board
Discuss the latest in technology
Outdoors Board
Discuss hunting, fishing and more
Movie TV Reviews
All things Hollywood are discussed here
Music Board
Discuss your favorite artists, songs, etc
Political Blog
Debate local, state, and federal issues
Money Blog
Discuss a wide range of financial issues
Fark
Fark this...
Video Game Reviews Tips
Break down the latest video game releases
Restaurant Reviews
Recipes, reviews, cooking tips and more
LSU Tickets
Buy, sell and trade your way to any event
Help Board
Need help with the site?

CFB Realignment Based On Program Strength?

The Wall Street Journal published an article on Wednesday titled "A Radical Realignment Plan for College Football”, in which they hypothetically realigned the "Big Five" power conferences based on football program strength...
quote:

To do that, Jonathan Jensen and Brian Turner chose to ignore geography and tradition, the typical forces in conference realignment. Instead, they focused solely on football and its financial implications, coming up with a formula that factored in every team’s football revenue, winning percentage, computer ranking and attendance between 2003 and 2013. Then they sorted teams into clusters to figure out which schools were most alike—and should be playing each other.
Here is what they came up with: Thoughts?
Filed Under: SEC Football
Originally published on SECRant.com

Comments (19) - Add Comments

0
0
Report Abuse
tigerjjs - 2 months ago
And what happens when some teams decline or improve over the years? Realign the conferences again?
0
0
Report Abuse
Mulerider - 2 months ago
Miles has lost control of the Wall Street Journal.
0
0
Report Abuse
JumpingTheShark - 2 months ago
"I ain't a meechigan fan but they do have the most wins all time I think, so they would probably belong in cluster 1. I am an LSU fan though and LSU, Awburn and Jawja probably should be in cluster 2. But I don't understand what they are using as guidelines. Is it all time wins? Is it the most titles? Or current wins, the last 20 years or so. Whatever it is, its a turrible idear."

Why the frick are you talking like that?
0
1
Report Abuse
vodkacop - 2 months ago
I ain't a meechigan fan but they do have the most wins all time I think, so they would probably belong in cluster 1. I am an LSU fan though and LSU, Awburn and Jawja probably should be in cluster 2. But I don't understand what they are using as guidelines. Is it all time wins? Is it the most titles? Or current wins, the last 20 years or so. Whatever it is, its a turrible idear.
1
0
Report Abuse
VaRebel1 - 2 months ago
There's no way Stanford is in cluster 3, no way Tennessee is in cluster 2, no way TCU, Oklahoma State, and Mizzou are in cluster 4.
1
0
Report Abuse
BrocraticMethod - 2 months ago
Lame.
2
0
Report Abuse
wadewilson - 2 months ago
Just go full on tard and model it after the Premier League's system. A team sucks for awhile, they get dropped to a weaker league.
2
1
Report Abuse
PurpleKnight88 - 2 months ago
Michigan and ND do not belong in cluster 1.
3
0
Report Abuse
bamaclownbaby - 2 months ago
I find it interesting that only 3 conferences are represented in Cluster 1. Sorry ACC and Pac 12.
1
0
Report Abuse
SECdragonmaster - 2 months ago
Stupid concept but........

Top 10 includes Auburn.

As usual, the current SEC Champions are representin!
2
0
Report Abuse
LSU_Saints_Hornets - 2 months ago
Cluster 1 stacked cluster 2,3,4, fricked!!!!!!!
2
0
Report Abuse
ctiger69 - 2 months ago
Blood bath for division 1
0
1
Report Abuse
Indfanfromcol - 2 months ago
All teams have been to or won a National Championship in that time frame in group 1 except Michigan.
So why are they in group 1 instead of Oregon, FSU, or USC?
1
1
Report Abuse
roadhouse - 2 months ago
I'm having a hard time understanding Okie St and Mizzou in cluster 4
2
0
Report Abuse
bamaclownbaby - 2 months ago
Pavo - I think the implication is that those would be 4 seperate divisions each playing for their own championship.
0
3
Report Abuse
Pavoloco83 - 2 months ago
Why the hell would all the best teams be in the same division? Some pussy team like Mississippi State would win their division while stronger teams would be killing themselves off.
1
8
Report Abuse
notsince98 - 2 months ago
It must have been heavily weighted on $$ because I don't see how Mizzou isn't in the 1st or second group based on success over that time frame.
2
2
Report Abuse
UnAnon - 2 months ago
Fire Miles.
2
0
Report Abuse
AggnHou - 2 months ago
And what does this accomplish? I'm confused?
Add a Comment
LASTEST HEADLINES
LSU WR Travin Dural Added To Biletnikoff Award Watch List
Dural has 4 TD's through 3 games this season.
Tennessee's Famous Rock Still Believes
Not that rocks can feel emotion, but...
ESPN Announcers For LSU Vs. Mississippi State
Kickoff set for 6:06pm CST this Saturday on ESPN.
1
Texas A&M WR Speedy Noil Has MCL Sprain
Tough break for the Aggies.
View in: Desktop
Copyright @2014 TigerDroppings.com. All rights reserved.