Dianne Feinstein wants to take your guns away:
Return to Board  •  Menu  •  Bottom  Page 3 of 4  
Message
re: Dianne Feinstein wants to take your guns away:
Posted by LSUgusto on 1/12 at 10:36 pm to trackfan
quote:

ELF
Earth LIberation Front -- an environmental terrorist group notorious for setting car dealerships on fire.

quote:

OWS did not engage in terrorism
I'm afraid we're getting into semantics here, but they weren't always pacifists.

quote:

Timothy McVeigh and Eric Rudolph?
Not groups, and certainly not representatives of "the right," despite Bill Clinton's BS.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by trackfan on 1/12 at 10:37 pm to Elcid96
quote:

"The special people" they can afford bodyguards, why shouldn't those who can't afford bodyguards not be allowed to protect themselves with the weapons she wants to ban. In this sense she is " a special person".

That's the point I made earlier. As long as we can carry what her bodyguards carry, she's not a hypocrite.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by LSUgusto on 1/12 at 10:39 pm to trackfan
It's a fair question. Does Fienstein think her bodyguards should be able to arm themselves with anything she doesn't think John Q. Public should? I'd like to know.


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Elcid96 on 1/12 at 10:42 pm to trackfan
You are missing my point. She can afford them to protect her, others can't afford armed guards and so to protect themselves and give them what they believe is their best protection they want to utilize one of the weapons she wants to ban. Purchasing one weapon might make one feel safer the same way she feels safe with her high end bodyguards yet she wants to ban some of theses weapons that others want to our purchase. IE one assault style weapon may equal the protection a poorer person can afford compared to her around the clock bodyguards who might be carrying just a pistol.


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by trackfan on 1/12 at 10:43 pm to LSUgusto
quote:

Timothy McVeigh and Eric Rudolph?
quote:

Not groups,


What's you point? Individuals can be just as lethal as groups.
quote:

and certainly not representatives of "the right," despite Bill Clinton's BS.

Anti-BATF? Anti-abortion? Come on man. You're really splitting hairs now.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by trackfan on 1/12 at 10:48 pm to Elcid96
The question I would ask her if I got the chance is what type of weapon did she carry back in the days when she was packing heat because she and her husband couldn't afford 24-hour bodyguards.

This post was edited on 1/12 at 10:49 pm

Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by LSUgusto on 1/12 at 10:51 pm to trackfan
quote:

Anti-BATF?
What group has committed violence against the BATF in recent years? I'm not saying no one has, I just can't think of any, other than the Mexican Cartels and Eric Holder's DOJ.

quote:

Anti-abortion?
I'd almost concede, except that anti-abortion terrorists seem to be lone actors like McVeigh or school shooters, rather than organized groups that use the tactic to send a message.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Elcid96 on 1/12 at 10:55 pm to trackfan
I wouldn't care what her answer was. The pint is who is she or anyone to decide what I or others, especially those in rural areas where cops response time might be very long should be allowed to protect ourselves or our property with.

See she now wants to ban high capacity magazines. So as far as I am concerned she should also limit the amount of bodyguards she has.

If she has two bodyguards and each guard has a legal 10 round magazine that would allow her to be protected by 20 rounds without reloading. However someone who couldn't afford a bodyguard would be limited to 10. So unless she only has one guard around and never any more or should I say no more then ten rounds available without reload then she is a hypocrite.




Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by JEAUXBLEAUX on 1/12 at 10:57 pm to Elcid96
Too bad she was unsuccessful so far


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by HempHead on 1/12 at 10:58 pm to JEAUXBLEAUX
quote:

JEAUXBLEAUX


So, Joe, you too would like to see every gun taken away?



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by LSUgusto on 1/12 at 10:59 pm to Elcid96
quote:

If she has two bodyguards and each guard has a legal 10 round magazine that would allow her to be protected by 20 rounds without reloading. However someone who couldn't afford a bodyguard would be limited to 10. So unless she only has one guard around and never any more or should I say no more then ten rounds available without reload then she is a hypocrite.
Right. Hence my question earlier. What would she be willing to deprive her guards of in the name of her defense? Would she object to them carrying armor-piercing bullets?



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan! on 1/12 at 11:00 pm to JEAUXBLEAUX
quote:

Too bad she was unsuccessful so far
You are the type of person every despot loves.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Elcid96 on 1/12 at 11:02 pm to LSUgusto
The better question would be, " what is she willing to deprive herself from" ! Should she introduce a bill regulating how many guards you can have? You can have two guards but then they could only have 5 rounds in each of their weapons?


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Elcid96 on 1/12 at 11:03 pm to JEAUXBLEAUX
Hey troll


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by HempHead on 1/12 at 11:06 pm to Elcid96
quote:

Hey troll


Unfortunately, JB is not a troll. He is consistently the biggest advocate of a large, authoritarian government that I have seen on this board.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Elcid96 on 1/12 at 11:09 pm to HempHead
Oh so a mindless troll!!! One who can't think for himself, so they look toward the g for all their guidance!!


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by TheDoc on 1/12 at 11:11 pm to HempHead
quote:

Unfortunately, JB is not a troll. He is consistently the biggest advocate of a large, authoritarian government that I have seen on this board.



yep, he's not a troll. he really does believe his bull shite.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by LSUgusto on 1/12 at 11:16 pm to TheDoc
quote:

he really does believe his bullshite
Don't we all?



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by G Love on 1/13 at 12:15 am to jamboybarry
Her 94 speech is just hubris. It's really poor form.


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by JEAUXBLEAUX on 1/13 at 2:08 am to G Love
I know you cant take away all guns. But i firmly believe. We beef to screen gun purchases. Types of weapobs. Quantity. And ease if buying them. Limits firepower

No idea what a troll us abd dont understand the obsession abd worship if guns


This post was edited on 1/13 at 2:14 am

Reply  •  Back to Top  •  Refresh
Return to Board
Jump to Page   

           Page 3 of 4           

 

 Message Boards
 Tiger Rant
 Recruiting Board
 SEC Rant
 Saints Talk
 Pelicans Talk
 More Sports Board
 Soccer Board
 O-T Lounge
 Outdoor Board
 Movie/TV Board
 Music Board
 Political Talk
 Money Talk
 Fark Board
 Gaming Board
 Fantasy Sports
 Food and Drink Board
 Ticket Exchange
 Help Board
 

 Other Options
 >> Search
 

 SECRant.com Links
 SEC Rant
 SEC Recruiting
 SEC Tickets
 Off-Topic Board
 

 Geaux.com Dining Guide
 New Orleans
 Baton Rouge
 

 Site Features (Full Version)
 Home Page
 LSU Football Schedule
 LSU News/TD News Wire
 Pick'em Home Page
 
Back to top
Sign In 
View in: Desktop
Copyright ©2014 TigerDroppings.com.