| Political Talk |
| Return to Board • Menu • Bottom |  Page 3 of 4  |
| Message |
re: Dianne Feinstein wants to take your guns away:quote:Earth LIberation Front -- an environmental terrorist group notorious for setting car dealerships on fire. quote:I'm afraid we're getting into semantics here, but they weren't always pacifists. quote:Not groups, and certainly not representatives of "the right," despite Bill Clinton's BS. Reply • Back to Top |
quote: That's the point I made earlier. As long as we can carry what her bodyguards carry, she's not a hypocrite. Reply • Back to Top |
| It's a fair question. Does Fienstein think her bodyguards should be able to arm themselves with anything she doesn't think John Q. Public should? I'd like to know. Reply • Back to Top |
| You are missing my point. She can afford them to protect her, others can't afford armed guards and so to protect themselves and give them what they believe is their best protection they want to utilize one of the weapons she wants to ban. Purchasing one weapon might make one feel safer the same way she feels safe with her high end bodyguards yet she wants to ban some of theses weapons that others want to our purchase. IE one assault style weapon may equal the protection a poorer person can afford compared to her around the clock bodyguards who might be carrying just a pistol. Reply • Back to Top |
quote: What's you point? Individuals can be just as lethal as groups. quote: Anti-BATF? Anti-abortion? Come on man. You're really splitting hairs now. Reply • Back to Top |
| The question I would ask her if I got the chance is what type of weapon did she carry back in the days when she was packing heat because she and her husband couldn't afford 24-hour bodyguards. This post was edited on 1/12 at 10:49 pm Reply • Back to Top |
quote:What group has committed violence against the BATF in recent years? I'm not saying no one has, I just can't think of any, other than the Mexican Cartels and Eric Holder's DOJ.  quote:I'd almost concede, except that anti-abortion terrorists seem to be lone actors like McVeigh or school shooters, rather than organized groups that use the tactic to send a message. Reply • Back to Top |
| I wouldn't care what her answer was. The pint is who is she or anyone to decide what I or others, especially those in rural areas where cops response time might be very long should be allowed to protect ourselves or our property with. See she now wants to ban high capacity magazines. So as far as I am concerned she should also limit the amount of bodyguards she has. If she has two bodyguards and each guard has a legal 10 round magazine that would allow her to be protected by 20 rounds without reloading. However someone who couldn't afford a bodyguard would be limited to 10. So unless she only has one guard around and never any more or should I say no more then ten rounds available without reload then she is a hypocrite. Reply • Back to Top |
| Too bad she was unsuccessful so far Reply • Back to Top |
quote: So, Joe, you too would like to see every gun taken away? Reply • Back to Top |
quote:Right. Hence my question earlier. What would she be willing to deprive her guards of in the name of her defense? Would she object to them carrying armor-piercing bullets? Reply • Back to Top |
quote:You are the type of person every despot loves. Reply • Back to Top |
| The better question would be, " what is she willing to deprive herself from" ! Should she introduce a bill regulating how many guards you can have? You can have two guards but then they could only have 5 rounds in each of their weapons? Reply • Back to Top |
| Hey troll Reply • Back to Top |
quote: Unfortunately, JB is not a troll. He is consistently the biggest advocate of a large, authoritarian government that I have seen on this board. Reply • Back to Top |
| Oh so a mindless troll!!! One who can't think for himself, so they look toward the g for all their guidance!! Reply • Back to Top |
quote: yep, he's not a troll. he really does believe his bull shite. Reply • Back to Top |
quote:Don't we all? Reply • Back to Top |
| Her 94 speech is just hubris. It's really poor form. Reply • Back to Top |
| I know you cant take away all guns. But i firmly believe. We beef to screen gun purchases. Types of weapobs. Quantity. And ease if buying them. Limits firepower No idea what a troll us abd dont understand the obsession abd worship if guns This post was edited on 1/13 at 2:14 am Reply • Back to Top • Refresh |
| Return to Board | ||
 Page 3 of 4  | ||
on 1/12 at 10:36 pm to 
on 1/12 at 10:58 pm to 
on 1/12 at 11:00 pm to 
on 1/12 at 11:11 pm to