Dianne Feinstein wants to take your guns away:
Return to Board  •  Menu  •  Bottom  Page 1 of 4  
Message
Dianne Feinstein wants to take your guns away:
Posted by TheDoc on 1/12 at 6:44 pm
LINK

How do I know she wants to take your guns away?

Because she said so, that's how.

quote:

"If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them, Mr. and Mrs. America, turn them all in, I would have done it."


-Senator Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif, discussing the 1994 "crime bill"


This post was edited on 1/12 at 6:56 pm

Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by MoreOrLes on 1/12 at 6:47 pm to TheDoc
oh no no no she just evolved


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by wickowick on 1/12 at 6:48 pm to TheDoc
quote:

Posted by wickowick on 1/12 at 6:02 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
The main discussion is about high powered automatic weapons


Want to know how I know, that you don't know, what the frick you are talking about...



And I would like to discuss these automatic machine guns that you abandoned in the previous thread...



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by LSUgusto on 1/12 at 6:48 pm to TheDoc
She didn't say that. You're a lunatic.


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by TheDoc on 1/12 at 6:49 pm to wickowick
quote:

And I would like to discuss these automatic machine guns that you abandoned in the previous thread...



you can tell he doesn't know what he's talking about on the matter when he brought that up



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by wickowick on 1/12 at 6:50 pm to TheDoc
quote:

you can tell he doesn't know what he's talking about on the matter when he brought that up


Yep, but it's time that the facts come out. If it comes at the expense of the ignorant, so be it...



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by TheDoc on 1/12 at 6:54 pm to LSUgusto
quote:

She didn't say that. You're a lunatic.





I guess there won't be many libs in this thread



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by wickowick on 1/12 at 7:08 pm to TheDoc
:crickets:


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by EST on 1/12 at 7:12 pm to TheDoc
She (and others like her) are enemies of our basic rights - our freedoms guaranteed by the Bill of Rights.

But apparently most people are willing to put up with it.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Radiojones on 1/12 at 7:22 pm to TheDoc
There was never a doubt in my mind. Just because a few libs on here are saying no one wants to take your guns doesn't make it true. I guarantee you Feinstein is not alone either.


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Tiguar on 1/12 at 7:25 pm to Radiojones
She's not. The day the shooting happened, my facebook blew up with "Its time to ban all guns"

"No more guns. Period."

Libs want the guns gone.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by los angeles tiger on 1/12 at 7:28 pm to Tiguar
BTW, try going to Feinstein's site to tell her how you feel about this. You can't. Those frickers in Washington block you from being able to do so. They claim that only their "constituents" can send them messages in support or opposition of bills.

fricking arrogant elitist asses that think we are their servants.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Mike da Tigah on 1/12 at 7:30 pm to los angeles tiger
I'm really surprised Draconian Sanctions hasn't made at least a cameo appearance by now.


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by TheDoc on 1/12 at 7:35 pm to Mike da Tigah
:chirpchirp:


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by wickowick on 1/12 at 7:40 pm to TheDoc
He must be on DU waiting for more talking points...


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by TheDoc on 1/12 at 7:45 pm to wickowick
well this thread completely shits on his so....


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Mike da Tigah on 1/12 at 7:46 pm to TheDoc
quote:

well this thread completely shits on his so....



Hard to argue with that.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by los angeles tiger on 1/12 at 7:58 pm to TheDoc
Doc, what makes this even more important to stand firm for our second amendment is that there are cities in California that are so broke that they've cut back on police and have told the citizens that they are "bascially on their own" to defend against criminals.

There's also this 2005 Supreme Court Ruling that stated that police are not responsible for our protection, but we must protect ourselves.

LINK


This post was edited on 1/12 at 8:01 pm

Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by TheDoc on 1/12 at 8:40 pm to los angeles tiger



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by jamboybarry on 1/12 at 8:51 pm to TheDoc
This from the same worthless cunt that concealed carried for fear of her own safety. Do as I say....


Reply  •  Back to Top  •  Refresh
Return to Board
Jump to Page   

           Page 1 of 4           

 

 Message Boards
 Tiger Rant
 Recruiting Board
 SEC Rant
 Saints Talk
 Pelicans Talk
 More Sports Board
 Soccer Board
 O-T Lounge
 Outdoor Board
 Movie/TV Board
 Music Board
 Political Talk
 Money Talk
 Fark Board
 Gaming Board
 Fantasy Sports
 Food and Drink Board
 Ticket Exchange
 Help Board
 

 Other Options
 >> Search
 

 SECRant.com Links
 SEC Rant
 SEC Recruiting
 SEC Tickets
 Off-Topic Board
 

 Geaux.com Dining Guide
 New Orleans
 Baton Rouge
 

 Site Features (Full Version)
 Home Page
 LSU Football Schedule
 LSU News/TD News Wire
 Pick'em Home Page
 
Back to top
Sign In 
View in: Desktop
Copyright ©2014 TigerDroppings.com.