| Political Talk |
| Return to Board • Menu • Bottom | Page 1 of 3  |
| Message |
| Fed Court Denies Navy Veteran From Owning Gun Due To 1968 Misdemeanor LINK quote: Reply • Back to Top |
| Wow. "The government is not going to take your guns." "We just want guns out of the wrong people's hands." "We just want to do stricter background checks." Reply • Back to Top |
| How the hell is it that the government must know this when it is a guaranteed right found in the Bill of Rights? It is fricking bull shite nonsense. Reply • Back to Top |
| Are these rules additive? Someone with two convictions, would they add both sentences together??? Reply • Back to Top |
quote: I mean the guy has a history right, look at the pattern, once in 68 years... Reply • Back to Top |
| The screws are tightening. In the cc classes I'm in right now we just finished discussion of the crossover of guns and medicine. If you have ever been prescribed an anti depressent prepare to have your license app subjected to extra scrutiny today. Tomorrow prepare to have it denied. Reply • Back to Top |
| stupid interpretation of the reg...however I'm failing to understand what him being a Navy Veteran adds to the story Reply • Back to Top |
quote: I agree, it shouldn't matter... Reply • Back to Top |
quote:rights are not absolute. you should know this. Reply • Back to Top |
quote: Please stop posting, because rights are not absolute. You have no right to speak anymore. Reply • Back to Top |
| this is why I disagree with the mental health avenue...mental health diagnosis is very fluid, depending on which MD you are talking to...you think this administration hasn't thought this through...keep believing they have our best interest at heart, freedoms will be lost...forever! Reply • Back to Top |
quote: Which will result in fewer people seeking the treatment they need. Reply • Back to Top |
| This is so stupid because I can go out and buy a gun a street. It's pretty easy to do. Yet government is too busy with this type of of bull shite to someone like this Navy Vet while having a revolving door for criminals that have been arrested multiple times and always have guns. Reply • Back to Top |
quote: Doesn't anyone find this even more outrageous? Reply • Back to Top |
| And from over 40 yrs ago? What a crock of shite.. Reply • Back to Top |
quote:appeal to emotion Reply • Back to Top |
quote: It's outrageous but I am not shocked since living in California. This post was edited on 1/12 at 2:21 pm Reply • Back to Top |
quote: Ya most likely. However, it is odd, and perhaps another angle, to suggest that as a Navy veteran, our country trusted him with at least weapon training, and therefore, this would appear to be sillier considering he was entrusted with weapons for national defense, but cannot be trusted to protect himself. Reply • Back to Top |
| Obama admitted to doing lots of drugs and doing such is something that is more than a misdemeanor. How in the hell can such a man be president and make such decisions about war if a Navy Vet isn't allowed to purchase a gun due to a misdemeanor from 1968? Let's not forget that he is pushing for gun control yet has associations and friendships with domestic terrorists that killed other Americans. This post was edited on 1/12 at 2:27 pm Reply • Back to Top |
| There is federal law that provides a procedure for felons to apply to the BATF to have their firearms rights restored. It is Title 18 United States Code section 925(c). BUT there is a catch-22. Congress has defunded the section of the BATF that processes these applications. Since there is no money to do them, they don't do them. Here is a little article where it was explained to a convicted congressman: Judge explains BATF defunding Reply • Back to Top • Refresh |
| Return to Board | ||
  Page 1 of 3  | ||
on 1/12 at 12:50 pm
on 1/12 at 1:10 pm to 
on 1/12 at 1:21 pm to 
on 1/12 at 2:04 pm to