| Political Talk |
| Return to Board • Menu • Bottom | Page 1 of 8  |
| Message |
| How about THIS as a compromise to our gun problem? Posted by Rex No automatic or semi-automatic weapons allowed in possession inside homes, business places, schools, government buildings, etc.  on 12/31 at 9:32 amPrivate ownership of those items allowed but storage must be maintained at municipal militia centers. Each city, town, village, or hamlet may maintain a municipal militia center with stockpiles of weapons, even tanks and bazookas and such, that provides education on usage, crisis actions, etc. The centers would not be part of nor accountable to the US military; it's the citizen militia that would satisfy the Second Amendment's call for a well-regulated militia, separate and apart from the king's army. Reply • Back to Top |
| A compromise is not telling another person what they have to do. Reply • Back to Top |
| How about we just abide by the original intent of the 2nd amendment and the constitution and STFU Reply • Back to Top |
| ok go give the government your guns,ill keep mine. Reply • Back to Top |
quote: So it will be even easier for them to lock the doors and take all of our weapons? Reply • Back to Top |
| Thats not a compromise at all. Reply • Back to Top |
| why compromise with loosers? Reply • Back to Top |
| Seems pretty idiotic to have centralized, registered storage of arms that can be targeted by an overbearing govt if the point of the 2nd ammendment was to protect against an overbearing govt... Reply • Back to Top |
quote: My OP proposition would do precisely that. Reply • Back to Top |
| Guys, I may be more liberal than your average poliboard poster but I will go on record and say that I believe Rex is a ruhtard. Reply • Back to Top |
quote: Only if you are 1. completely ignorant of history and can't read. 2. A retard Choose wisely Reply • Back to Top |
| We don't need to compromise because your side will never win. The Second Amendment is here to stay, as are personal gun rights. Deal with it. Reply • Back to Top |
Posted by Mike da Tigah on 12/31 at 9:37 am to Rex How about NO?Reply • Back to Top |
quote: Centralized? You think an army could sieze every such depot, in all American cities and towns, all at once? Our military is nowhere near that big. Reply • Back to Top |
quote: I agree BUT... That attitude is why we are losing rights IMHO. We have the right to "bear" arms but not the right to manufacture them, import them, sale them, or be free from absurd taxes on them. They aren't going hit us directly in the nuts, they are going to pull the rug out from under us first. This post was edited on 12/31 at 9:40 am Reply • Back to Top |
Posted by Vegas Bengal on 12/31 at 9:40 am to Rex I think a good compromise would be to have those who want those type of weapons go through a process similar to obtaining a concealed weapons permit with the training courses, background checks, time delays.Reply • Back to Top |
quote: So if our military is so powerless, small, and incompetent, maybe each person SHOULD bear arms.  This post was edited on 12/31 at 9:42 am Reply • Back to Top |
| You do realize "semi-automatic" encompasses all sporting guns which are not single shot, right? Lever actions, pump action, bolt actions are, by definition "semi-automatic". How is this a compromise? A US compromise to what Europe wants the US to be? Nah...I'll keep it the way it is, thank you. Reply • Back to Top |
Posted by Mike da Tigah on 12/31 at 9:41 am to theunknownknight quote: True, and at the rate we're going, bullets and magazines are going to be worth more than the dollar by an enormous margin. Reply • Back to Top |
quote: That already exists (minus the training) for automatic weapons and explosives You want this to pertain to semi-auto weapons as well? Retroactively? Reply • Back to Top • Refresh |
| Return to Board | ||
  Page 1 of 8  | ||
on 12/31 at 9:33 am to 
on 12/31 at 9:36 am to