Return to Board  •  Menu  •  Bottom  Page 2 of 4  
Message
re: As the Commish crumbles: Stories questioning the NFL's alleged evidence
Posted by Fun Bunch on 5/8 at 8:48 pm to shel311
It'll take you like 30 seconds.


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by shel311 on 5/8 at 8:51 pm to shel311
Why is there no paragraph 6?


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Fun Bunch on 5/9 at 9:29 am to shel311
No clue. I did not catch that.


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Telephone Tough Guy on 5/9 at 12:09 pm to shel311
quote:

Why is there no paragraph 6?


Wondering the same. And why are the paragraphs numbered?



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by kclsufan on 5/9 at 4:01 pm to Telephone Tough Guy
quote:

Wondering the same. And why are the paragraphs numbered?

That's typical in an affidavit, which is more evidence that Hargrove never wrote it.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by STEVED00 on 5/9 at 9:27 pm to kclsufan
The Commish brought all this on himself by continually bragging about how much and how damning the "bounty documentation was. I must have heard the NFL spout off a dozen times how they had over 15k pages of documentation. Then the NFL solicited the former prosecutor to review and she in turn said how damning and conclusive the data was.

Did the NFL actually think eventually people would NOT start asking to see all the "data"? If I didn't have a dog in the fight, I still would want to know what the documentation actually said bc the NFL was been bragging for months how great it was.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Fun Bunch on 5/10 at 9:33 am to STEVED00
Added Hargrove "mischaracterization" story.


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by swagsurfin7 on 5/10 at 12:08 pm to Fun Bunch
150 pages


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by thedice20 on 5/10 at 3:15 pm to Fun Bunch
this thread only strengthens the pissed off smoldering fire within me.




Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by thedice20 on 5/11 at 8:59 am to Fun Bunch
you need to add ornsteins email


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Patrick O Rly on 5/11 at 9:10 am to thedice20
quote:

this thread only strengthens the pissed off smoldering fire within me.


It pisses off the gay man inside you?



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by thedice20 on 5/11 at 9:14 am to Patrick O Rly
quote:

It pisses off the gay man inside you?


hmmmmm

I guess i couldnt accurately articulate how angry i was yesterday. Re-reading it does sound homo



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Fun Bunch on 5/11 at 9:17 am to thedice20
Added the Ornstein email story.


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Patrick O Rly on 5/11 at 9:21 am to thedice20
I'm just jerking you...I'm just kidding.


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by thedice20 on 5/11 at 9:22 am to Patrick O Rly
quote:

I'm just jerking you...


nohomo?



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Cincinnati Bowtie on 5/11 at 10:57 am to Fun Bunch
quote:

How the NFL isn't being crucified for it is beyond me


The media is still taking the Williams audio literally. When he says " Affect the head" he's meaning intimidate. When he says "We want Gore's head going sideways" he means keep him from running North and South, yet the Worldwide Leader and NFL Network keeps pumping out that these are Damning Evidence of a Bounty!



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Fun Bunch on 5/11 at 11:03 am to Cincinnati Bowtie
Why aren't the spending any time on the Giants ADMITTING to going after Kyle Williams concussed head?

That's what I want to know. Yet it is completely ignored.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by NOSHAU on 5/11 at 12:34 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:

Why aren't the spending any time on the Giants ADMITTING to going after Kyle Williams concussed head?

That's what I want to know. Yet it is completely ignored.


What is annoying is that Aiello has completely blown this off as well as Ryan's comments in his book - "Each game we might also designate an opposing player with a dot," Ryan wrote in a chapter titled, 'Blunt Force Trauma.' "Players don't want to be dotted by the New York Jets, because that means we want that dude knocked out of the game." Aiello said that players are held accountable for their actions on the field (i.e not intent). However, I guess that "rule" only applies to teams like the Giants and Jets whereas the Saints are being severly punished for spoken word and assumed intent. It is ludicrous to me that the owners are sitting back and letting the incompetent one ruin the credibility of their league.




LINK



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by jdrumdog on 5/11 at 3:35 pm to NOSHAU
So....does that mean teams can take out opposing players nut if they don't get paid extra for it.....its ok?


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Bayou on 5/11 at 5:41 pm to thedice20
quote:

this thread only strengthens the pissed off smoldering fire within me.

Stapuffmarshy is pissed the fire is getting fueled!



Reply  •  Back to Top  •  Refresh
Return to Board
Jump to Page   

           Page 2 of 4           

 

 Message Boards
 Tiger Rant
 Recruiting Board
 SEC Rant
 Saints Talk
 Pelicans Talk
 More Sports Board
 Soccer Board
 O-T Lounge
 Outdoor Board
 Movie/TV Board
 Music Board
 Political Talk
 Money Talk
 Fark Board
 Gaming Board
 Fantasy Sports
 Food and Drink Board
 Ticket Exchange
 Help Board
 

 Other Options
 >> Search
 

 SECRant.com Links
 SEC Rant
 SEC Recruiting
 SEC Tickets
 Off-Topic Board
 

 Geaux.com Dining Guide
 New Orleans
 Baton Rouge
 

 Site Features (Full Version)
 Home Page
 LSU Football Schedule
 LSU News/TD News Wire
 Pick'em Home Page
 
Back to top
Sign In 
View in: Desktop
Copyright ©2013 TigerDroppings.com.