Return to Board  •  Menu  •  Bottom  Page 1 of 2  
Message
Godzilla (1998)
Posted by JabarkusRussell on 4/7 at 12:41 am
Where did it go wrong?


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by jojothetireguy on 4/7 at 1:57 am to JabarkusRussell
Wasn't a man in a suit. To much bad cgi. Bad casting. Bad overgrown lizard. I can continue but you get the point


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Elleshoe on 4/7 at 2:07 am to JabarkusRussell
that puff daddy song on the soundtrack was straight fiya


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by SpqrTiger on 4/7 at 5:31 am to Elleshoe
Being an old school Godzilla fan, I feel completely qualified to tell you where this movie went wrong.

Two main areas: theme and behavior of the title beast.

Theme: now this is very important to the spirit if what made the 1959 Godzilla so good. Godzilla is never really explained other than he is an unnatural abomination hell-bent on making mankind pay for atomic irresponsibility. He is a destroyer. An avatar of environmental vengeance. In the 1998 version, he is a scared, giant lizard (though created by atomic energy) who is just trying to find a safe place to have babies (??!!??!). All the damage it causes is accidental or collateral. He/she (another problem) spends just as much time running away as it does wrecking shite.

And that leads to point two: Godzilla, why you no wrecking shit? We paid to see you kick arse and frick things up. Why are the film makers treating Godzilla like a pussy? And where the frick is the atomic breath? Seriously? How hard is it to make a Godzilla movie?

The problem with Godzilla isn't about man in suit or Matthew Broderick or the French secret service. It's about Godzilla the character. They made him into something he's not, and the audience didn't recognize it. And rightfully so.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Tactical1 on 4/7 at 6:23 am to SpqrTiger
Godzilla disappearing for about 50 minutes in the middle of the film was pretty stupid for me.


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by St Augustine on 4/7 at 6:28 am to Elleshoe
That soundtrack was pretty good back in HS


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by LSUMJ on 4/7 at 9:13 am to SpqrTiger
Didnt the ending have them
Completely surrounded by newborn monsters, and they just went out the door?



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by computerguy on 4/7 at 9:56 am to SpqrTiger
SpqrTiger - by far the best explanation

made me laugh, but it is true: "Godzilla, why you no wrecking shit?"



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by lsuin92 on 4/7 at 10:33 am to JabarkusRussell
Godzilla could outrun military helicopters but couldn't catch a taxi


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Zamoro10 on 4/7 at 10:35 am to SpqrTiger
quote:

SpqrTiger




This post was edited on 4/7 at 10:36 am

Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by KingRanch on 4/7 at 10:39 am to JabarkusRussell
I was 12 when it came out and I watched the shite out of it


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by JabarkusRussell on 4/7 at 1:19 pm to Elleshoe
The monster died half way through the movie and we were left with the little raptors instead. Broderick was miscast too.


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Duane Dibbley on 4/7 at 1:58 pm to SpqrTiger
quote:

SpqrTiger




Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by TigerMyth36 on 4/7 at 3:53 pm to Duane Dibbley
They spent a zillion dollars on a overseas rubber suit concept.

They pissed off the Rubber suit fans with CGI without having a good enough story to rope in non-godzillas fans.

Evidently, they went wrong at the very first step.

But....they are trying again and possibly committing the same mistakes.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by jojothetireguy on 4/7 at 4:14 pm to TigerMyth36
quote:

But....they are trying again and possibly committing the same mistakes.


Nooooo. I thought they were bringing back the man in the suit for the newest one?



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by TigerMyth36 on 4/7 at 4:19 pm to jojothetireguy
quote:

Nooooo. I thought they were bringing back the man in the suit for the newest one?

Last I read they hadn't settled on man in rubber suit.

Even if it is man in rubber suit, I bet you, it will be augmented with CGI to the point you can't even tell it is man in rubber suit.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by jojothetireguy on 4/7 at 4:46 pm to TigerMyth36
Dammit. I mean it's not a necessity but they have to stay true to form and not go with a giant iguana.
For as many movies as I've watched, I have never been more disappointed in film more than I was with this one



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by TigerTalker142 on 4/7 at 4:55 pm to JabarkusRussell
I think I might have been the only person that enjoyed it? Then again I was 8 when it came out...Seriously though I guess I need to re-watch it, I just remember it as being moderately enjoyable with good special effects for that time period.


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by jojothetireguy on 4/7 at 5:19 pm to TigerTalker142
It may have been for you. But I grew up watching the old Godzilla movies, so I was accustomed to the look, the sound and just the overall badassness of the monster.
Can't fault you, but you need to watch some of the older films



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Brosef Stalin on 4/7 at 6:07 pm to jojothetireguy
I had fun pointing out all the movies it ripped off. There were blatant rip offs of Jurassic Park and Aliens, among others.


Reply  •  Back to Top  •  Refresh
Return to Board
Jump to Page   

           Page 1 of 2           

 

 Message Boards
 Tiger Rant
 Recruiting Board
 SEC Rant
 Saints Talk
 Pelicans Talk
 More Sports Board
 Soccer Board
 O-T Lounge
 Outdoor Board
 Movie/TV Board
 Music Board
 Political Talk
 Money Talk
 Fark Board
 Gaming Board
 Fantasy Sports
 Food and Drink Board
 Ticket Exchange
 Help Board
 

 Other Options
 >> Search
 

 SECRant.com Links
 SEC Rant
 SEC Recruiting
 SEC Tickets
 Off-Topic Board
 

 Geaux.com Dining Guide
 New Orleans
 Baton Rouge
 

 Site Features (Full Version)
 Home Page
 LSU Football Schedule
 LSU News/TD News Wire
 Pick'em Home Page
 
Back to top
Sign In 
View in: Desktop
Copyright ©2013 TigerDroppings.com.