| Help Board |
| Return to Board • Menu • Bottom | Page 1 |
| Message |
| What's the rule that my deleted thread falls under? Posted by BRhuskyfan80 I'm curious if it's just arbitrary, or if there's a double standard to protect a certain group. I've seen some pretty offensive threads on this board, particularly against women that go unscathed.  on 3/12 at 12:28 pmShow me something I typed that merits a whack (or ban), and I will show you something that wouldn't even raise an eyebrow if it were about trailer park residents. This post was edited on 3/12 at 12:31 pm Reply • Back to Top |
 Reply • Back to Top |
| Dhillip's euphemism corollary. The Ratio was exceeded, and once that happens you get a parabola shift and the thread is automatically whacaked if not counterbalanced by tits. It's basic math. Reply • Back to Top |
quote: Yet, the rules clearly state that the showing of tits is a grave offense. This is quite a conundrum. Reply • Back to Top |
quote: Ah yes, it would seem so. But due to the Pectus principle, this is negated. The bannitudinal propensity of tits is inversely related to their quality, or Fap Factor. The higher tits rate on the Fap Factor, the lower their bannitudinal propensity becomes. The Fap Factor rates on a scale from Sad Panda to Christina Hendricks. While Sad Panda tits always result in bannage, the closer tits approach absolute Christina Hendricks, the lower the chance of bannage (or channage). It is said that tits that reached absolute Christina Hendricks would actually result in Un-bannage, but that has never been objectively proven. Like I said, simple, simple math here Reply • Back to Top |
| The extent of hilarity in that post is not measurable by any numeric value. Reply • Back to Top |
quote: I took Math 3962 when i was at LSU, the science of posting. Unfortunately it coincided with my Around the world at the Chimes. Guess who won. Reply • Back to Top • Refresh |
| Return to Board | ||
  Page 1 of 1   | ||
on 3/12 at 12:31 pm to 
on 3/12 at 12:49 pm to 
on 3/13 at 1:16 am to