Return to Board  •  Menu  •  Bottom  Page 6 of 7  
Message
re: What a brave man John Brown was
Posted by gonads&strife on 3/6 at 10:54 am to RollTide4Ever
quote:

I suppose you cheered on the 9/11 terrorists as well.


I'm sure he did because the cause of ending slavery is exactly like the cause driving AQ. Yeah, exactly.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by RollTide4Ever on 3/6 at 10:55 am to RollTide4Ever
One thing to consider is that majority of slave owners were in precarious financial situations (land rich, cash poor). Best example was Jefferson, who is very complex on this issue. I suspect the main reason he didn't free all of his slaves was that he needed the collateral to pay off his debt.


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by gonads&strife on 3/6 at 10:56 am to RollTide4Ever
quote:

As for the issue of slavery, too many folks make a big deal out of its existence and ending. The face was that after the civil war, the state of most AAs didn't improved that much until maybe the early 20th century if that. Not all slavery was alike, you had city slaves/plantation slaves. You had slaves with cruel masters and slaves with "kind" masters. The fact that the average slave lived to 40, while a person in Ireland on average died by 20 is baffling to me.

With that said, American slavery was better than that in Brazil and Haiti, just by looking mortality rates and the gender ratios.


What's your point?



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by RollTide4Ever on 3/6 at 10:56 am to gonads&strife
So the folks getting bombed to bits is no concern of yours? Nice to know.


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by alajones on 3/6 at 10:56 am to gonads&strife
quote:

So you're a moral relativist?
No, but I realize what I believe to be right and wrong isn't shared universally.

I would say someone who is okay with what Brown did because they agree with his cause is practicing moral relativism.

quote:

And are you sure slavery wasn't seen as a moral wrong by most people by 1860s?
I must not have made this point clear earlier, because you are the second person who thought this. I was just saying that it didn't have the same views like we have now. Not that x number of people thought it was fine.




Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by gonads&strife on 3/6 at 10:56 am to RollTide4Ever
quote:

One thing to consider is that majority of slave owners were in precarious financial situations (land rich, cash poor). Best example was Jefferson, who is very complex on this issue. I suspect the main reason he didn't free all of his slaves was that he needed the collateral to pay off his debt.


What're you getting at? Are you attempting to justify?



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by RollTide4Ever on 3/6 at 10:59 am to gonads&strife
The point was celebrate people that actually achieved long-term, visual results. Brown (and Turner) were footnotes in history.

Celebrate someone like William Loyd Garrison, who once braved a northern mob b/c even northerners weren't too keen on freeing AAs all at once.

For many years (prior to the civil war), Illinois made it illegal for any AA to live there.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by trackfan on 3/6 at 11:00 am to RollTide4Ever
quote:

You're being disingenious. In 1860, the majority of the advanced world was controlled by America, UK, France, and Austrian_Hungarian empire

1) The U.S. was not a global empire in 1860. The major colonial slave powers were the U.K., France, Spain, Portugal and the Netherlands.

2) France was the first European nation to ban slavery in 1794.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by RollTide4Ever on 3/6 at 11:01 am to gonads&strife
You were the one stating that even most southerners thought slavery was wrong (Not sure where you get the numbers on this).

Incidentally, the worst race riot in American history was the draft riots of NY during the civil war.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by gonads&strife on 3/6 at 11:01 am to alajones
quote:

No, but I realize what I believe to be right and wrong isn't shared universally.

I would say someone who is okay with what Brown did because they agree with his cause is practicing moral relativism.


I never got into whether he was justified. I just don't think he is the equivalent of AQ. He took the wrong route to achieve his goal, however, he presaged the coming conflict.

And whether you admit it or not you are engaging in moral relativism.

quote:

I must not have made this point clear earlier, because you are the second person who thought this. I was just saying that it didn't have the same views like we have now. Not that x number of people thought it was fine.


This is muddled, what's your point of pointing out they had different views, but that slavery was viewed as morally wrong?



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by gonads&strife on 3/6 at 11:02 am to RollTide4Ever
quote:

So the folks getting bombed to bits is no concern of yours? Nice to know.


That doesn't follow what I said.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger on 3/6 at 11:05 am to Kissinger11
quote:

He stood for the truth and fought for freedom even though he knew he would definitely die. IMO he was a Christ like figure A great American


Proof that one man's miserable, bushwhacking, child murdering, women murdering terrorist can be another man's "freedom fighter."





Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by trackfan on 3/6 at 11:07 am to gonads&strife
quote:

quote:

I suppose you cheered on the 9/11 terrorists as well.


I'm sure he did because the cause of ending slavery is exactly like the cause driving AQ. Yeah, exactly.

ROLLTIDE is only doing what a lot of folks do when they find themselves on the losing side of a debate, which is resort to creating these absurd straw men that are easily knocked down.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by trackfan on 3/6 at 11:11 am to RollTide4Ever
quote:

The face was that after the civil war, the state of most AAs didn't improved that much until maybe the early 20th century if that

Actually, Blacks made great gains during Reconstruction. It wasn't until Rutherford Hayes ended Reconstruction when the Black Codes were passed that Blacks lost ground and then had to endure 90 years of Jim Crow.
quote:

Not all slavery was alike, you had city slaves/plantation slaves. You had slaves with cruel masters and slaves with "kind" masters.




Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by CarrolltonTiger on 3/6 at 11:14 am to trackfan
quote:

Why do you think all of the European powers had already abolished it?


Becasue it wasn't difficuult and the industrial revolution made it unnecessary.

How much easier is it to abolish it in the colonies than when it is part of your national economic system? Sort of as easy as it was for the north to be against it once they got rid of it by selling their slaves down the river.







Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by trackfan on 3/6 at 11:14 am to RollTide4Ever
quote:

It's well-known that Turner was a schizophrenic.

You still haven't answered my qiestion. Let me repeat it. Do you think that slaves like Turner should have just peacefully accepted their fate as slaves for the whole lives?



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by RollTide4Ever on 3/6 at 11:15 am to trackfan
How do you quantify "great gains", in what terms? Token political appointments?

B/c AAs as a whole didn't see their lot improve until they moved up more industrialized north and California (later one for the latter). The north had 4 times the schools the south had, not to mention a better teaching pool.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by alajones on 3/6 at 11:19 am to gonads&strife
quote:

Wouldn't you agree that the Brown's cause was morally just (ending enslavement of humans) while the other is not (establishing the caliphate)?
quote:

I never got into whether he was justified.
Hmmmm.


quote:

And whether you admit it or not you are engaging in moral relativism.
Pointing out that people of different cultures and different era's have different values, norms, and ethics than Americans in 2012 is moral relativism?

My point with the slavery comment is you can't place your 2012 views on people from that era and say they were wrong and John Brown's cause was right.




This post was edited on 3/6 at 11:32 am

Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by trackfan on 3/6 at 11:21 am to RollTide4Ever
quote:

How do you quantify "great gains", in what terms? Token political appointments?

B/c AAs as a whole didn't see their lot improve until they moved up more industrialized north and California (later one for the latter). The north had 4 times the schools the south had, not to mention a better teaching pool.

When do you think Blacks had their first governor of a state or sent its first member to Congress?



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by RollTide4Ever on 3/6 at 11:31 am to trackfan
How did that improve the lot of AAs in general?

Temporary gains once the northern troops pulled out.



Reply  •  Back to Top  •  Refresh
Return to Board
Jump to Page   

           Page 6 of 7           

 

 Message Boards
 Tiger Rant
 Recruiting Board
 SEC Rant
 Saints Talk
 Pelicans Talk
 More Sports Board
 Soccer Board
 O-T Lounge
 Outdoor Board
 Movie/TV Board
 Music Board
 Political Talk
 Money Talk
 Fark Board
 Gaming Board
 Fantasy Sports
 Food and Drink Board
 Ticket Exchange
 Help Board
 

 Other Options
 >> Search
 

 SECRant.com Links
 SEC Rant
 SEC Recruiting
 SEC Tickets
 Off-Topic Board
 

 Geaux.com Dining Guide
 New Orleans
 Baton Rouge
 

 Site Features (Full Version)
 Home Page
 LSU Football Schedule
 LSU News/TD News Wire
 Pick'em Home Page
 
Back to top
Sign In 
View in: Desktop
Copyright ©2013 TigerDroppings.com.