In game thread for Benghazi hearings
Return to Board  •  Menu  •  Bottom  Page 36 of 37  
Message
re: In game thread for Benghazi hearings
Posted by CajunAngele on 5/8 at 5:11 pm to Peeta2

exit polls are so accurate. thanks for posting that wow did you know Obama carted in mental patients and buses from all over voting 6 times each with some dead people too?



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by TigerNAtux on 5/8 at 7:28 pm to GoBigOrange86
quote:

Republicans are grandstanding and trying to tie everything to Obama/Clinton. Democrats are deflecting to protect their leader's image and the image of their party. It's not about the truth. It's about power.


I didn't watch or see the Benghazi hearings. I was at work. But from your statement I conclude that if you changed Obama/Clinton to Clinton/Gore, you would have the Waco hearings. Same song, different verse.




Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by TigerJeff on 5/8 at 8:23 pm to dante
Anybody w/ a brain knew the Obama Administration screwed the pooch on Benghazi and then lied/covered it up, to win the election. I mean, this stuff isn't new. The media ignored the story so Obama could get re-elected. So anyway, if it's proven beyond a reasonable that the Obama Administration lied and misled the American people, what is going to come of it? Nothing.


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by dante on 5/8 at 8:46 pm to TigerJeff
Should the republicans not shine the light on lies and cover ups? Should they just let this administration get away with whatever they want while blaming the republicans for all the current problems.

With that attitude I am assuming you never played sports because you would never play against teams that you didn't think you could beat.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Interception on 5/8 at 8:51 pm to funnystuff
quote:

Under-qualified. There is a difference. I'm not saying that she has no qualifications; I'm saying she doesn't have enough. I will always maintain that Obama was in the same situation when he first ran. Stop assuming that everyone with a different opinion than you is a complete fool


I honestly can't think of a whole lot of people that are more qualified to be president. Most of the people on my list are former presidents though.


This post was edited on 5/8 at 8:52 pm

Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by funnystuff on 5/8 at 9:14 pm to Interception
For the record, are you referring to Clinton or Obama? I strongly disagree either way, and I have no intention of getting into a huge debate on this. I know I'm not going to change your mind on this topic, and you can rest assured I won't be changing mine. But just for the sake of clarity, I'm curious.


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Scoop on 5/8 at 9:27 pm to CptBengal
Let us employ a ninja sword to cut through the shite here. Back in the day, the media was biased but tried to hide it.

Now, they absolutely do not give a single shite about hiding it.

They are advocates for the left and absolutely advocates for Obama.

No shred of integrity and any left leaning a-hole that contests this is just a silly a-hole.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Reubaltaich on 5/8 at 9:32 pm to funnystuff
A lot of this is pointing towards Clintons inaction on this whole deal. She is looking like the goat & an incompetent buffoon.

A question in the back of my mind is this, will Clinton squeal out barry in order to keep her presidential hopes for 2016?




Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Springfield XD on 5/8 at 9:39 pm to Reubaltaich
quote:

A question in the back of my mind is this, will Clinton squeal out barry in order to keep her presidential hopes for 2016?



In the weeks right after this, it looked like this was going to happen. He was trying to throw her under the bus, and she was on the verge of ratting his arse out.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Scoop on 5/8 at 10:02 pm to Springfield XD
I watched the last hour of the hearings live and then saw how the media cherry picked and misled about what happened and it has left me very depressed . It's so sad.

Why would anyone put themselves out there like that knowing the machine is gonna chew them up and spit them out because the machine serves the left?



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Crimson1st on 5/8 at 11:19 pm to Scoop
quote:

I watched the last hour of the hearings live and then saw how the media cherry picked and misled about what happened and it has left me very depressed


Yeah on a post hearing ABC news break on the radio, the announcer totally missed the point on the hearings and they completely skewed the situation, mentioning it briefly at the end of the break...oh but they sure pounded, no pun...ok well maybe a little, Jodie Arias!



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Choctaw on 5/9 at 8:25 am to Peeta2
quote:

I think interception mentioned earlier that this is not a big issue with people right now.


the only people that don't care about this issue are those that want it swept under the rug to protect their dear leader.....which is a fricking shame



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Poodlebrain on 5/9 at 9:18 am to Choctaw
Once these hearings have been completed there will be a comparison made between the testimony presented and that given by Hillary Clinton and others in previous hearings. There will have to be some sort of explanation for any discrepencies between testimony. Hillary Clinton had better hope that all records of communications on September 11, 2012 have been destroyed, or she will have no political future.


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by dante on 5/9 at 9:43 am to Poodlebrain
quote:

there will be a comparison made between the testimony presented and that given by Hillary Clinton
quote:

some sort of explanation for any discrepencies between testimony
Do not expect anyone from the MSM to do that. Unfortunately someone from the private sector or conservative news source will have to put that together. When that happens the MSM will only say.....it's not really a story, look who is reporting it. But I agree that all the testimony should be analyzed jointly.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by idlewatcher on 5/9 at 9:52 am to Reubaltaich
quote:

A question in the back of my mind is this, will Clinton squeal out barry in order to keep her presidential hopes for 2016?


You know this old song and dance - BFF's during their working relationship. Come presidential debate time, all of a sudden they are demons. She'll keep quiet until that time and then when he's about to finish up his term, she'll squeal and say something slightly retarded like "Had I been President, this would have been looked at more carefully" As much as I dislike her, I can't blame her - I'd do the same thing to keep my hopes alive.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by CajunAngele on 5/9 at 10:41 am to Poodlebrain



Dem. Representative: 'Enough Benghazi," "What's the Big Deal Here' -YouTube Video



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Decatur on 5/9 at 11:07 am to CajunAngele
quote:

Just before House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) began a potentially explosive hearing Wednesday on the 2012 attacks on the U.S. consulate Benghazi, Libya, Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) said he was satisfied with the information he had received.

"I feel like I know what happened in Benghazi. I'm fairly satisfied," Corker said Wednesday on MSNBC's "The Daily Rundown." "But look, the House wants to have hearings, I hope they're done in a respectful way and hopefully it will shed some light on what happened."


quote:

Corker also called for an examination into the four State Department officials who were removed from their posts after the attacks and placed on administrative leave, but have continued to be paid.

"Other than that, I've been able to read all the cables," he said. "I've seen the films."


LINK



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE on 5/9 at 11:13 am to Decatur
quote:

hopefully it will shed some light on what happened.


Hmmmmmmmm



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Crimson1st on 5/9 at 11:22 am to Decatur
Wow! You'd seldom see a Democrat with an honest take should the roles be reversed. Like someone else said about the hearings yesterday...

One side was investigating an attack on our ambassador,citizens,and country while the other side was investigating an attack on Obama...



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Interception on 5/9 at 2:37 pm to funnystuff
quote:

For the record, are you referring to Clinton or Obama? I strongly disagree either way, and I have no intention of getting into a huge debate on this. I know I'm not going to change your mind on this topic, and you can rest assured I won't be changing mine. But just for the sake of clarity, I'm curious.


Clinton



Reply  •  Back to Top  •  Refresh
Return to Board
Jump to Page   

           Page 36 of 37           

 

 Message Boards
 Tiger Rant
 Recruiting Board
 SEC Rant
 Saints Talk
 Pelicans Talk
 More Sports Board
 Soccer Board
 O-T Lounge
 Tech Board
 Outdoor Board
 Movie/TV Board
 Music Board
 Political Talk
 Money Talk
 Fark Board
 Gaming Board
 Fantasy Sports
 Food and Drink Board
 Ticket Exchange
 Help Board
 

 Other Options
 >> Search
 

 SECRant.com Links
 SEC Rant
 SEC Recruiting
 SEC Tickets
 Off-Topic Board
 

 Geaux.com Dining Guide
 New Orleans
 Baton Rouge
 

 Site Features (Full Version)
 Home Page
 LSU Football Schedule
 LSU News/TD News Wire
 Pick'em Home Page
 
Back to top
Sign In 
View in: Desktop
Copyright ©2014 TigerDroppings.com.