I'm thinking the Rob Ryan "hire" was bad information
Return to Board  •  Menu  •  Bottom  Page 2 of 2
Message
re: I'm thinking the Rob Ryan "hire" was bad information
Posted by Hugo Stiglitz on 2/7 at 11:17 am to Chad504boy
Welcome back Chad, too bad you couldn't spring Breesus with you.

Seems like there could have been back channeling between Payton and Ryan's people before he got reinstated.

just a guess.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Chad504boy on 2/7 at 11:23 am to Patrick O Rly
quote:

And not to thread jack, but were you briefly banned?


yes, i went to a dark place and i hate the dark. glad to be back.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Chad504boy on 2/7 at 11:25 am to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:

Seems like there could have been back channeling between Payton and Ryan's people before he got reinstated.


meh, then you would think he wouldn't have made that bee line straight to the rams. I think payton knows of Ryan to some degree... its just an odd scenario. And why is it taking so long for him to interview?



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Patrick O Rly on 2/7 at 11:33 am to Chad504boy
Plus, there have been multiple reports, confirmed by Crennel's agent, that he was never contacted by the team. Yet he was listed as a top candidate. This in my mind confirms that Payton is putting out misinformation for one reason on another.


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by josh336 on 2/7 at 11:35 am to Patrick O Rly
He is prob trying to see who in his office is leaking stuff to the media so it doesnt happen going forward


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Chad504boy on 2/7 at 11:35 am to Patrick O Rly
quote:

This in my mind confirms that Payton is putting out misinformation for one reason on another.



Its hard for me to call it misinformation at this time because all we know it could be 100% that Ryan is the obvious plan at this point. But the why and how's are very tough for me to grasp.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Patrick O Rly on 2/7 at 11:39 am to Chad504boy
quote:

Its hard for me to call it misinformation at this time because all we know it could be 100% that Ryan is the obvious plan at this point. But the why and how's are very tough for me to grasp.


It could be an attempt to find a person in the organization who's leaking info. It could be a middle finger to espn, who treated the Saint org. like crap.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Chad504boy on 2/7 at 11:43 am to Patrick O Rly
quote:


It could be an attempt to find a person in the organization who's leaking info. It could be a middle finger to espn, who treated the Saint org. like crap.



I find that to be unlikely given the consistency of the reports and Glazer reporting the same thing and you know he's "verifying" with his people, not just regurgitating tweets.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Patrick O Rly on 2/7 at 11:49 am to Chad504boy
Glazer tweet simply implied that he's the leading candidate, not that they plan on hiring him.


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Chad504boy on 2/7 at 11:51 am to Patrick O Rly
quote:

Glazer tweet simply implied that he's the leading candidate, not that they plan on hiring him.


I understand the slight differences. It's hard to factually distinguish a "plan to hire" and "leading candidate and his job to lose" basically if the end result is Ryan is hired. The reports don't bother so much as why is he the leading candidate with his track record and without even an interview, plus why is it taking like 2 weeks to even interview?



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Patrick O Rly on 2/7 at 11:56 am to Chad504boy
quote:

The reports don't bother so much as why is he the leading candidate with his track record and without even an interview, plus why is it taking like 2 weeks to even interview?


Because while his track record may not be great, it's better than Grantham and whoever else they're attempting to hire, which is a position coach. In my view we'll hire Ryan if we're not convinced by the other two. In other words, I don't think leading candidate = first choice. It's more of the "safe" one.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Chad504boy on 2/7 at 11:58 am to Patrick O Rly
I'm very disheartened by the lack of opportunity it appears we are having to hire positional coaches in the NFL.


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Patrick O Rly on 2/7 at 12:03 pm to Chad504boy
I'm pretty sure we'll get to interview one from the Ravens. Most teams want their coaches to get promotions.


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Chad504boy on 2/7 at 12:07 pm to Patrick O Rly
quote:

I'm pretty sure we'll get to interview one from the Ravens. Most teams want their coaches to get promotions.


Monachino guy? He spent like 5 years as positional coach in Jax in a 4-3 system... been promoted in Baltimore to LB coach. Never coordinated before. Would he be capable and knowledgeable enough to install a 3-4 system here?



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Patrick O Rly on 2/7 at 12:10 pm to Chad504boy
Well that's how it usually goes, and that's what the interview is for. To see if the guy is ready.


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Chad504boy on 2/7 at 12:14 pm to Patrick O Rly
Bob Slowik LB coach for washington has a decent background, not sure if he's coordinated a 3-4 before though.


Reply  •  Back to Top  •  Refresh
Return to Board
Jump to Page   

           Page 2 of 2           

 

 Message Boards
 Tiger Rant
 Recruiting Board
 SEC Rant
 Saints Talk
 Pelicans Talk
 More Sports Board
 Soccer Board
 O-T Lounge
 Tech Board
 Outdoor Board
 Movie/TV Board
 Music Board
 Political Talk
 Money Talk
 Fark Board
 Gaming Board
 Fantasy Sports
 Food and Drink Board
 Ticket Exchange
 Help Board
 

 Other Options
 >> Search
 

 SECRant.com Links
 SEC Rant
 SEC Recruiting
 SEC Tickets
 Off-Topic Board
 

 Geaux.com Dining Guide
 New Orleans
 Baton Rouge
 

 Site Features (Full Version)
 Home Page
 LSU Football Schedule
 LSU News/TD News Wire
 Pick'em Home Page
 
Back to top
Sign In 
View in: Desktop
Copyright ©2014 TigerDroppings.com.