| Movie/TV Board |
| Return to Board • Menu • Bottom | Page 1 |
| Message |
| Just saw Fargo for the first time Posted by kjntgr Why is this movie so popular? The local dialect? on 2/6 at 12:10 amReply • Back to Top |
| ooo yah Reply • Back to Top |
quote: Yah! Reply • Back to Top |
| Bad movie to watch on AMC. And it's popular because it's a fantastic film. Reply • Back to Top |
| All your Yah are belong to Fargo. Reply • Back to Top |
| I enjoyed it This post was edited on 2/6 at 12:22 am Reply • Back to Top |
| Where is pancakes house? Reply • Back to Top |
| Favorite film of the 90's. Just watched another...Groundhog day. So if Paul Bunyan made/famous for "flapjacks", why do people in Brainerd want pancakes? ...and yet in Pennsylvania (home of Dutch baby "pancakes") drunk townies are only up for flapjacks? Reply • Back to Top |
| It's a really good movie but not one you should watch for the first time when it's censored. Yahhhhhhhh Reply • Back to Top |
| And then I said that the movie is good...thats it...end of story Reply • Back to Top |
| 2 words Wood. Chipper. Reply • Back to Top |
| yah Reply • Back to Top |
| One of em was kinda funny lookin' Reply • Back to Top |
quote:I have no idea. McDormand did well. Besides that the movie was no big deal at all. Reply • Back to Top |
quote: Macy's performance was a homerun, too. I enjoyed it, but I'm a Cohen fan - I like all of their movies - they are true artists. Fargo may not be everybody's cup of tea, but, objectively, it is an excellent film. The dialogue was just so well done and thought out - not a wasted syllable in the film: Marge Gunderson: Okay, I want you to tell me what these fellas looked like. Hooker #1: Well, the little guy, he was kinda funny-looking. Marge Gunderson: In what way? Hooker #1: I dunno, just funny-lookin'. Marge Gunderson: Can you be any more specific? Hooker #1: I couldn't really say. He wasn't circumcised. Marge Gunderson: Was he funny lookin' apart from that? Hooker #1: Yeah. Marge Gunderson: So, you were having sex with the little fella, then? Hooker #1: Uh-huh. Marge Gunderson: Is there anything else you can tell me about him? Hooker #1: No. Like I say, he was funny lookin'. More n' most people even. Marge Gunderson: And what about the other fella? Hooker #2: He was a little older. Looked like the Marlboro man. Marge Gunderson: Yah? Hooker #2: Yah. Maybe I'm sayin' that cause he smoked Marlboros. Marge Gunderson: Uh-huh. Hooker #2: A subconscious-type thing. Marge Gunderson: Yah, that can happen. Hooker #2: Yah. Hooker #1: They said they were goin' to the Twin Cities? Marge Gunderson: Oh, yah? Hooker #2: Yah! Hooker #1: Yah. Is that useful to ya? Marge Gunderson: Oh, you betchya, yah. Reply • Back to Top |
| And I guess that was your accomplice in the wood chipper? Love saying that. In particular the word chipper. Reply • Back to Top |
| I give it credit for being one of the best examples of a movie that seems insanely genuine and really nails the feel of the environment/area it's in. Outside of that, it was pretty meh for me. Reply • Back to Top |
| it's overrated. Reply • Back to Top • Refresh |
| Return to Board | ||
  Page 1 of 1   | ||
on 2/6 at 12:13 am to 
on 2/6 at 12:28 am to 
on 2/6 at 1:54 am to 
