Lindsey Graham (re: Libya) - Transcript Added
Return to Board  •  Menu  •  Bottom  Page 2 of 3  
Message
re: Lindsey Graham (re: Libya) - Transcript Added
Posted by OLDBEACHCOMBER on 10/14 at 2:52 pm to miketiger
They could have used that $3 million they gave to Nancy Pelosi's husband as a grant to teach fishermen how to fish for his fish canning plant, for security in Libya


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Cruiserhog on 10/14 at 3:10 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:

The response to every failure of our government cannot be that there wasn't enough money thrown at the problem.


thats reasonable but its also reasonable to not attack the Administraton when Republican cuts were just as culpable in this incident



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by RTR America on 10/14 at 3:13 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:

thats reasonable but its also reasonable to not attack the Administraton when Republican cuts were just as culpable in this incident


Way to completely ignore the posts that point out that your idiotic claim is wrong.

More Democrats voted to cut the budget than Republicans.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Elcid96 on 10/14 at 3:33 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:

thats reasonable but its also reasonable to not attack the Administraton when Republican cuts were just as culpable in this incident





Total BS! There has already been direct testimony given under oath indicating money was not the problem for the security of the Consulate. Nice talking point though.

At point 3:35:35 on c-span video here >> LINK /

Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.): "Mrs Lamb, you made this decision personally [to reject the request for more security], was there any budget consideration, or lack of budget, that allowed you not to increase the people in the security force there"

Response: "No Sir."




This post was edited on 10/14 at 3:37 pm

Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by udtiger on 10/14 at 3:43 pm to Cruiserhog
Cruiserhog

Congress passed funding. Obama/State decided how to spend it. THEY skimped on security in a HOT area. Maybe they should have been more interested in protecting their diplomats instead of their "green" projects.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by real on 10/14 at 3:52 pm to udtiger
All Obama and his people will do is deny knowing for a few more weeks,that's all they need. There is a video ,with audio from that event, and you can hear the people chanting together,"Obama ,Obama were all Osama's. you've heard it here 1st and it will surface but after the election. The event had nothing to do with video and had everything to do with Obama continually bragging about how he killed Osama.


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Chrome on 10/14 at 4:01 pm to ottothewise
quote:

same old shite from Graham. side kick to McCain,
interchangeable anti-Obama talk from both McCain and Graham.
both are without a clue as to how to make peace in the world.
they are both about war, and spending on war material.


None of this dispells the Obama administration cover up about the attack and lack of response to Steven's requests and concerns before the attack.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Patrick_Bateman on 10/14 at 4:10 pm to Patrick_Bateman
Link added in OP


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Patrick_Bateman on 10/14 at 4:13 pm to ottothewise
quote:

ottothewise

Nice argument (not). Do you have any evidence whatsoever that challenges Graham's statements of fact? I'll wait. . .



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Patrick_Bateman on 10/14 at 4:19 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:

Republican cuts were just as culpable in this incident

Do you acknowledge that more Democrats than Republicans voted to approve those cuts? And do you acknowledge that sworn testimony from last week indicates that the budget did not have an effect on the lack of security at the compound?

Your claim is completely irrelevant to the fact that the Obama administration lied for two weeks to the American people (including the four victims' families) about the true nature of events in Benghazi.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by prplhze2000 on 10/14 at 4:33 pm to Patrick_Bateman
Every single SERIOUS Democrat I know can't believe they are being this stupid and making these mistakes. Should've just said we are investigating, well provide info as its available and we will get justice. That's it.

Just like watergate, the damn lies just make it worse.

and it didn't help when NBC tried to badger the Libyan president.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by DawgfaninCa on 10/14 at 4:47 pm to Patrick_Bateman
I find it outrageous Oduma's excuse is the Administration based their original belief that the attack was the result of a protest over the airing of the video on faulty intelligence.

The Left called Bush a liar after he started the Iraq war based on faulty intelligence that Saddam had WMDs.

Does that mean now the Left will do the same thing and call Oduma a liar?



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by wallowinit on 10/14 at 5:24 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:

Does that mean now the Left will do the same thing and call Oduma a liar?





Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Tiger Authority on 10/14 at 5:29 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:

Cruiserhog


You've been completely owned in this thread.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by TigerNAtux on 10/14 at 6:23 pm to Patrick_Bateman
I don't know if it's been said, but I can't bypass a Lindsay Graham thread without saying:

frick him.

I remember all that "good work" he did during the bank bail-outs. Condescending pig.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by LSURep864 on 10/14 at 9:03 pm to Patrick_Bateman
Lindsay Graham's progressive arse is going to lose his seat to Tom Davis in 2014. The guy is a neocon big government hack


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Patrick_Bateman on 10/14 at 9:12 pm to LSURep864
Do you dispute anything he said today on Face the Nation? Or fault him for saying it? The answer to both of those questions, to me, is no. I applaud him for saying what everyone else seems to be too afraid or inarticulate to say.


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by theunknownknight on 10/15 at 7:48 am to Cruiserhog
quote:

or could it be being forced to make 300 million in security spending for embassies because Republicans wanted to make cuts and here is one of the spots their blind axe fell and now they want to blame Obama for lax security


1. Cuts to what? There is no BUDGET! Thank Obama and the Dems for that.
2. Since there is no budget, there is simply an appropriations committee handing out needed spending. If the Obama admin needed the money all they had to do was request it. Guess what? No request was made.
3. With all that said: Charlene Lamb from the state department testified under oath last week that security was not refused because of budgetary reasons.

You lose.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Zahrim on 10/15 at 8:02 am to theunknownknight
Don't forget the Ambassador to France has a full detachment of Marines to protect him from the French, but there was no need to have a Marine detachment in Libya to protect Ambassador Stevens.


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Catman88 on 10/15 at 8:03 am to ottothewise
Dude why cant you just admit what you and the rest of the fricking world knows already.

HE frickED UP! Obama royally screwed the pooch on this one. How can you just spew that this is hate speech? Seriously? WTF does Obama royal screw job have to do with funding? What does blantant lies to the American people have to do with funding?



Reply  •  Back to Top  •  Refresh
Return to Board
Jump to Page   

           Page 2 of 3           

 

 Message Boards
 Tiger Rant
 Recruiting Board
 SEC Rant
 Saints Talk
 Pelicans Talk
 More Sports Board
 Soccer Board
 O-T Lounge
 Tech Board
 Outdoor Board
 Movie/TV Board
 Music Board
 Political Talk
 Money Talk
 Fark Board
 Gaming Board
 Fantasy Sports
 Food and Drink Board
 Ticket Exchange
 Help Board
 

 News
 LSU
 More Sports
 Sports Lite
 

 Other Options
 >> Search
 

 SECRant.com Links
 SEC Rant
 SEC Recruiting
 SEC Tickets
 Off-Topic Board
 

 Geaux.com Dining Guide
 New Orleans
 Baton Rouge
 

 Site Features (Full Version)
 Home Page
 LSU Football Schedule
 Pick'em Home Page
 
Back to top
Sign In 
View in: Desktop
Copyright ©2014 TigerDroppings.com.