| Political Talk |
| Return to Board • Menu • Bottom |  Page 2 of 4  |
| Message |
re: Romney changing positionsquote: Oh. Thank you for the clarification.  Reply • Back to Top |
quote:You just described Obama succinctly. Well done.  Reply • Back to Top |
quote: I like how you qualify your statements. It is like a CYA clause embedded within each post. quote: What are your concerns, if any? Reply • Back to Top |
quote:Yep. They're both exactly the same. That's been my argument on here for months. Reply • Back to Top |
| Is that kinda like Obama changing positions on the national debt? or the deficit? Or gay marriage? or trayvon's resemblance to his non-existent son? or how much corporate welfare the banks should get? Reply • Back to Top |
quote:Where does Obama stand on Gay Marriage, closing Gitmo, bringing the troops home, Rev. Wright, Islam, Ayers, earmarks, Rezco, a budget, wiretapping, transparency, domestic oil production, the Capital of Israel, cutting the deficit, ..... Reply • Back to Top |
quote: Mitt v. Mitt On health care: •"I'm proud of what we've done. If Massachusetts succeeds in implementing [Romneycare], then that will be a model for the nation." Speech in Baltimore, 2007 •"[Romneycare] is something that was crafted for Massachusetts. It would be wrong to adopt this as a nation." Presidential primary debate, 2011 On abortion rights: •"I believe that since Roe v. Wade has been the law for 20 years we should sustain and support it." Debate with Sen. Edward Kennedy, 1994 •"I do support the Republican platform, and I support that being part of the Republican platform, and I'm pro-life." The Huffington Post, November 2011 On gay rights: •"I'll be better than Ted Kennedy on gay rights" Interview with Bay Windows, 1994 •"I opposed then, and I do now, gay marriage and civil union." The New York Times, 2012 On conservatism: •"I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush." Debate with Sen. Edward Kennedy, 1994 •"I fought against long odds in a deep blue state, but I was a severely conservative Republican governor," Conservative Political Action Conference, 2012  Reply • Back to Top |
quote: what he has in store with the DoD spending the crony capitalism i know will continue, but with a different set of beneficiaries fear he will cave to the likes of AARP and lay off reforming medicare quote: well, i'm concerned with who will win, not keeping some pristine complete perfection with the things i support. otherwise i'd run and when'd you turn so douchey? Reply • Back to Top |
quote: Well, besides those. Reply • Back to Top |
| Why would I want a president so solid in his ideals he won't do what the people elect him to do or find compromise with the opposite side for the sake of getting shite done. Reply • Back to Top |
quote: You misunderstand me. That was a observation of respect. I deal with legal jargon all day long and have to CYA (or CMA) with everything I write all day because it can be considered legal advice. Every email I send out, etc. So, it was meant as a sign of respect of one who thinks about what they say when they are saying it. And my question about your concerns was simply out of curiosity as do not come across as a "politard" but someone who might say something that makes me think or consider. Reply • Back to Top |
quote: guess i did. my bad Reply • Back to Top |
quote: Reading comprehension not your thing? Building a model for states of the nation vs a federal implementation? Ah, frick it, just use the words however it fits you... quote: Hmmm...sounds familiar... Reply • Back to Top |
quote: I can with confidence say that a few nights ago Mitt stood on Obamas neck and stomped his ass. Think about that! Reply • Back to Top |
| [quoteWelcome to the Poli Board. The following passes for logic: quote: The election isn't about Romney it's about getting rid of Obama. We can worry about Romney once Obama is gone. One thing a time]. [/quote] Is doing nothing but constantly telling everyone you are in favor of an alternative for which there is literally an absolute zero chance of it ever coming to pass, somehow inherently more "logical"?  Reply • Back to Top |
quote: i chuckled Reply • Back to Top |
quote: To the casual observer. Reply • Back to Top |
quote: Nope. That just is not the case. Just because he doesn't rule out military action, does not make him or anyone else "pro-war." Reply • Back to Top |
quote: This philosophy sure worked well for Sen. Bennett or Sen Lugar. The days of political compromise seem to be coming to an end in DC. The far right and far left will try and primary you out if you do. Reply • Back to Top |
| Most of his position changes have been on social issues. Economically and fiscally he has been pretty consistent. I can forgive him his social issue changes because imo your social stances change a lot more than your economic ones. Reply • Back to Top • Refresh |
| Return to Board | ||
 Page 2 of 4  | ||
on 10/5 at 3:44 pm to 
on 10/5 at 3:46 pm to 
on 10/5 at 3:58 pm to 
on 10/5 at 4:19 pm to