Return to Board  •  Menu  •  BottomPage 1
Message
Did the NBA re-enact the Zone to combat Shaq's dominance?
Posted by Roaad on 6/6 at 11:42 am
Thoughts?


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by theunknownknight on 6/6 at 11:44 am to Roaad
Kobe > Lebron


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by LSUgators on 6/6 at 11:45 am to theunknownknight
quote:

Kobe > Lebron

This. Why is this thread even up?


This post was edited on 6/6 at 11:46 am

Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Tiger1242 on 6/6 at 11:45 am to Roaad
Interesting theory, Maybe more because players are so much bigger now a days, and yea it may have started with Shaq


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Roaad on 6/6 at 11:46 am to theunknownknight
quote:

Kobe > Lebron

At rape



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by TigerintheNO on 6/6 at 11:46 am to Roaad



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Roaad on 6/6 at 11:47 am to Tiger1242
quote:

Interesting theory,
My thoughts were that you can't stop Shaq from getting the ball with one guy on him.

At the time it was illegal to double the guy w/o the ball.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Roaad on 6/6 at 12:14 pm to Tiger1242
My point is, that I think the Zone defense hurts many big men, and proficient post players.

I am reminded of this when watching guys like Howard, Tim Duncan, and LeBron James.

These guys' numbers would explode, if they played under the same rules Jordan did.

Not drawing a comparison, but Jordan was an amazing post player (even though people remember him otherwise). Jordan was a master of the post up fade away. In today's league, he would have two men on him the moment he got within 15 ft of the basket. He would still put up points, just not as many.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by fightingtiger2335 on 6/6 at 12:43 pm to Roaad
Ya but also hand checking wad legal, you could commit hard foul without suspensions so hits were a lot harder, and more so than ever superstars are protected


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by texastiger38 on 6/6 at 12:47 pm to LSUgators
quote:

This. Why is this thread even up?


The MSB is in a dark, dark place right now.



Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by bomber77 on 6/6 at 12:54 pm to Roaad
It was more to stop the players from clearing one side of the floor and one guy backing down. Mark Jackson was one of the biggest offfenders. Terrible to watch.


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by Roaad on 6/6 at 4:07 pm to bomber77
No, it was enacted to prevent great post players of inordinate size from getting the ball so easily in such great position.

The idea was to force more perimeter passing and jump shooting.

They were partially successful.

The downside was that great individual low-post performers can no longer totally dominate a game on offense.

Well, unless the defenders were just bad.

Imagine MJ, if you took away his post-game.


This post was edited on 6/6 at 4:08 pm

Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by tigerblood29 on 6/6 at 5:31 pm to Roaad
and winning rings


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by tigerblood29 on 6/6 at 5:32 pm to Roaad
yes,Shaq was unstoppable otherwise


Reply  •  Back to Top
Posted by tigerblood29 on 6/6 at 5:32 pm to Roaad
yes,Shaq was unstoppable otherwise


Reply  •  Back to Top  •  Refresh
Return to Board
Jump to Page   

           Page 1 of 1           

 

 Message Boards
 Tiger Rant
 Recruiting Board
 SEC Rant
 Saints Talk
 Pelicans Talk
 More Sports Board
 Soccer Board
 O-T Lounge
 Outdoor Board
 Movie/TV Board
 Music Board
 Political Talk
 Money Talk
 Fark Board
 Gaming Board
 Fantasy Sports
 Food and Drink Board
 Ticket Exchange
 Help Board
 

 Other Options
 >> Search
 

 SECRant.com Links
 SEC Rant
 SEC Recruiting
 SEC Tickets
 Off-Topic Board
 

 Geaux.com Dining Guide
 New Orleans
 Baton Rouge
 

 Site Features (Full Version)
 Home Page
 LSU Football Schedule
 LSU News/TD News Wire
 Pick'em Home Page
 
Back to top
Sign In 
View in: Desktop
Copyright ©2013 TigerDroppings.com.