| Political Talk |
| Return to Board • Menu • Bottom |  Page 11 of 15  |
| Message |
| re: Obama, Kenya and the Harvard Law Review Same old shite. I've concluded that Carlin was right. He was right, again. LINK LINK LINK Best for last This post was edited on 5/17 at 8:38 pm Reply • Back to Top |
| Obama may need you for spin DA, good things ahead :tm: Reply • Back to Top |
quote: Great shite. LINK  Reply • Back to Top |
quote: Yes they work. A fact conveniently ignored by hypocritical liberals. Reply • Back to Top |
| Like DA? Reply • Back to Top |
Posted by redandright on 5/17 at 9:02 pm to dr smartass phd quote:LINK And this is the MO of every Obama campaign. They do this to anyone-private citizens, like Joe the Plumber, donors to opponents, like Mr Van der Sloot. Nothing is beyond them,to achieve their ends. You can be sure his campaign was behind the unsealing of Ryan's divorce papers, never mind that they were parents of young children at the time. He also did the same thing to Democrat primary opponents. But we are supposed to be outraged about what what Mitt Romney did 50 years ago when he was 17. Reply • Back to Top |
Posted by Revelator on 5/17 at 9:13 pm to redandright quote: I guess that newspaper made a mistake as well?? Reply • Back to Top |
| The libtards in this thread are unbelievable. It's like talking to children. There is absolutely nothing that Obama can do that they won't defend. I said it in another thread recently and I'll say it again. Liberals do not debate with facts. Half truths and snarky quips are what pass for logic. The essence of the revelation about this publication is the obvious lie. He either lied to the publisher, or failed to correct the egregious error. To believe that he didn't notice the error is so illogical it is absurd. Okay, so what, you say. Lots of folks lie for many reasons. At the time, this probably seemed like a small thing,an inconvenient factoid in an insignificant pamphlet. However, ever since Obama became a candidate, his past became a big issue, as it does for any candidate for even local offices. Eventually, the question of his birth place arose. This caused the unleashing of the Democratic machine's hounds of hell to attack anyone who asked the very legitimate question. And now we know that all the while Obama had, at a minimum, allowed the idea of him being foreign born to be published for his own advantage. There is no escaping the conclusion that he is a mendacious snake. This post was edited on 5/17 at 9:23 pm Reply • Back to Top |
quote: Rachael destroyed that bull shite lie about Vanderslut. I can link the vid if you can't find it. Reply • Back to Top |
quote: Apparently, his publicist was the first birfer. Reply • Back to Top |
quote: This ridiculous birther tripe is beyond hackneyed. You'll have to forgive me for pointing out that every time you dummies form a circle and tug on each other's peckers about some Obama conspiracy, it turns out to amount to a whole lot of nothing. Since the level of discourse on this board is typically far below that of reasonably intelligent children, I'll take that little barb as a compliment. And, btw, I'd bet everything in my pockets that I've done more to help elect Republicans to national office than you have. Reply • Back to Top |
quote: I kige that. But this is from before he was on the national stage and isn't coming from the Goopers or the PUMAs. And it's juuuuuuuuust too much of a coincidence. I suspect he was pulling a Fauxcahontas here. Reply • Back to Top |
Posted by Revelator on 5/17 at 9:34 pm to Navytiger74 quote: Exaggerate much! Reply • Back to Top |
quote: I certainly don't think it's impossible. Until someone comes forward with some kind of proof that can't be discredited in the span of an afternoon, I think it's time to let it drop. I'd say Obama's re-election problems are pretty substantial without the silly games. Reply • Back to Top |
| Dude, you're actually saying a man with the arrogance to write an autobiography at 30 years old wouldn't notice for 20 years that his bio was wrong for his literary representative? Really?? Reply • Back to Top |
| If I didn't know better, I'd swear you are employed by the Democratic Party as a campaign operative to back Obama despite all logic and do as much damage control as possible. I'd like to see your bank records. Surely you are on their payroll. "let's all just move along and stop talking about this now" How dictatorial. Taking cues from El Presidente? Reply • Back to Top |
quote: Nice. Reply • Back to Top |
quote: Terry Lakin agrees. Reply • Back to Top |
Posted by Revelator on 5/17 at 10:06 pm to Navytiger74 The liberals in here like to write everything off as conspiracy or coincidence? What about Obama's attending A racist church for 29 something years? What about his communist associations? What about the total lack of transparency having to do with his medical records and grade transcripts? All conspiracy and coiescedence right? This is straight from Sal Alinsky's playbook," Rules for Radicals"! Use character assassination and try to shame your attackers instead of addressing the issues. Reply • Back to Top |
| Romney bullied a weird kid in high school. Obama did cocaine and pursued marxism/socialism. Hmm. Amazing that cokehead barry wants to play that game. Reply • Back to Top • Refresh |
| Return to Board | ||
 Page 11 of 15  | ||
on 5/17 at 8:36 pm to 
on 5/17 at 8:49 pm to 
on 5/17 at 9:24 pm to 
on 5/17 at 10:03 pm to