| Political Talk |
| Return to Board • Menu • Bottom |  Page 3 of 4  |
| Message |
re: Pacquiao's comments on gays: big deal or no deal?quote: I think that would be totally reasonable (ETA: your view is reasonable... not the backlash  ).This post was edited on 5/16 at 5:08 pm Reply • Back to Top |
| Three now.. Anybody else think the gays should be put to death? Reply • Back to Top |
| Didn't the reporter finally admit he was the one who brought up Leviticus in the article? Pacquiao never even mentioned it at all. Reply • Back to Top |
quote:no, he wasn't. That was the reporter. Reply • Back to Top |
| So this thread is officially dead and all the Pacquiao bashers can now apologize? Reply • Back to Top |
quote: That's not how it works. Reply • Back to Top |
| reading comprehension is dead. Reply • Back to Top |
| He's going to lose his endorsement contract with Nike because of this. I hope the millions he's going to lose from this is no big deal to him. Reply • Back to Top |
| I agree. Reply • Back to Top |
| What are you agreeing with? He never said it! Reply • Back to Top |
| I will put this here as well. Manny did not say that. Writer deceived his audience. Also, a reason why the writer chose to write the article the way he did and deceive his audience: quote: This post was edited on 5/16 at 9:47 pm Reply • Back to Top |
quote: I haven't found any bible passages with an expiration date on them. You would think the 'unerring word of God' wouldn't forget something that obvious, would you? Reply • Back to Top |
quote: Over what? Being against gay marriage or you thinking he said he wants gays dead? Regardless. Nike would be spineless if they pulled his contract. Militant gays are an extremist group who really are irrelevant except when extremist straight libs and the media back their cause making it appear they are relevant. Reply • Back to Top |
quote: I am sure you will join me in my disgust with Nike if this happens? Or, do you like it when people that do things that you disagree with suffer? I would think you would disagree with them, but want them to suffer no harm because of their unpopular belief? Reply • Back to Top |
quote:exactly for what? Can you read? Reply • Back to Top |
quote: Hyperbole alert !! Reply • Back to Top |
quote: It has already happened with the use of one word. Do you really think it is too much of a stretch to think that PC could bring us to this place? Reply • Back to Top |
quote:  Reply • Back to Top |
quote: YOu think Nike is going to keep him after all the shite he said?? Reply • Back to Top |
| Is it really the word that they are after? "marriage" If religions coin the phrase, traditional marriage to distinguish between gay and normal marriages, I would assume there would be an uproar to call their's a traditional marriage. A civil union gives all the rights of a marriage, but that is not enough. They want the word, something to make them think that we think it is normal. It is not. I do not care what people do in their personal lives, none of my concern. This does not change my view on the matter. When a man cheats on his wife, none of my concern, but I think it is wrong. Reply • Back to Top • Refresh |
| Return to Board | ||
 Page 3 of 4  | ||
on 5/16 at 5:06 pm to 
on 5/16 at 5:07 pm to 
on 5/16 at 8:41 pm to 
on 5/16 at 9:25 pm to .gif){kind=icon}
on 5/16 at 9:28 pm to 
on 5/16 at 9:45 pm to