| Political Talk |
| Return to Board • Menu • Bottom | Page 1 |
| Message |
 Ryan against military cuts, after allPosted by ottothewise LINK  on 5/2 at 9:29 pmRyan is leading the charge to restore military spending. Reply • Back to Top |
| And you link Rachel Maddow's blog...you fricking partisan hack. You get dumber each and every day. This post was edited on 5/2 at 9:46 pm Reply • Back to Top |
 nothing like linking Rachel Maddow for straight facts on republicans. Do you want me to link you to Rush Limbaugh's opinions on Obama? Reply • Back to Top |
quote:Liar. Ryan is against the $600 billion cut that even Leon Panetta claims would "tear a seam in the nation's defense". Ryan supports major military spending cuts and, in fact, is only proposing to reduce the size of the cut the Pentagon is facing. They would still take a cut of possibly several hundred billion dollars under his proposal. LINK LINK That's what you get for linking Maddow. Reply • Back to Top |
quote: boom? I think boom. BTW, otto, how's that that research into "women's subconcious yearning for rape" going? This post was edited on 5/2 at 10:32 pm Reply • Back to Top |
| This thread just went BOOM in a very few responses. Reply • Back to Top |
| Did she address the fact that when a woman is raped she produces eggs? Reply • Back to Top |
quote: i wonder if otto's parents ever had "the talk" with him? Reply • Back to Top |
Posted by Doc Fenton on 5/2 at 10:33 pm to ottothewise quote: Sounds cool. Reply • Back to Top |
| otto, the Dept of Defense is one of the few FedGov agencies that actually does make significant spending cuts . . . often to the detriment of force readiness. The US military forces have been planning for big force size cuts ever since 2009. Even Leon Panetta, no war hawk for sure, warns that the cuts proposed by some are dangerously severe. But don't let Truth and Facts get in your way. Why start now? Reply • Back to Top |
| So Otto got owned again for spewing (his favorite word) propaganda and then promptly bolted his own thread as usual? This post was edited on 5/3 at 6:10 pm Reply • Back to Top |
quote: The cuts you claim were actually merely reductions in the planned INCREASE. Reply • Back to Top |
quote: do you know, or not? Reply • Back to Top |
quote:like obama's deficit reduction plans? Reply • Back to Top |
| What you have is Ryan is attempting to back away from the current, actual agreement. no surprise. and no surprise you have to guess how much he would cut. Reply • Back to Top |
quote: I bet you also buy the argument that the debt ceiling agreement means the Senate Democrats don't need to propose, let alone pass, a budget this year either, don't you? Reply • Back to Top |
| I'm a patriotic Rep., but I can tell you from first hand experience as the son of a retired Air Force pilot, that we can cut leftover WW2 bases all over the world. They are not connected to militant Muslums or Al-Kaida and we are not fighting the Germans or Japanese anymore. Just leave Afganistan and close about 20 WW2 bases and you've got $400 mil in cuts that don't affect or hurt present day military. Reply • Back to Top |
quote:From my link: "the Pentagon is expected to make $487 billion in cuts over the next five years"... "Ryan's proposed 2013 budget would replace $214 billion of that." $487,000,000,000 -$214,000,000,000 $273,000,000,000 For you to headline "Ryan against military cuts" when he's proposing a $273B cut is pretty deceitful of you and Maddow. This post was edited on 5/3 at 7:39 pm Reply • Back to Top |
quote: That's gotta be a boom, amirite? Reply • Back to Top • Refresh |
| Return to Board | ||
  Page 1 of 1   | ||
on 5/2 at 10:24 pm to 
on 5/3 at 12:50 am to 