Sign In  |  Register  
November 21, 2009 
LSU Football
Buddy's Week 7 NFL RankingsI measure 6 things to develop my rankings. A perfect team
would have 6 power points. The worst team would have
192. It usually starts off wacky but the cream seems to
rise to the top as we move from week to week. They are bunched
up in groups right now. That's because the cream hasn't had
enough games to rise to the top yet.I have every confidence that
it will as we move along. It has for years.

These are the new rankings after the week 7 games.

For those who don't understand, any team above would
currently be favored over any team ranked below them

Looks like they have divided up into A,B,C,and D teams right now.





1. pats........45
2. broncos.....48
3. saints......50
4. packers.....52
5. giants......55
6. colts.......57
7. steelers....62

8. ravens......72
8. eagles......72
10. vikings.....75
10. cowboys.....75
12. jets........82
13. bengals.....85
14. dolphins....88
15. cardinals...92


16. chargers...103
17. 49ers......105
17. texans.....105
17. panthers...105
17. seahawks...105
21. redskins...106
22. falcons....108
23. jaguars....114

24. bears......121
25. bills......122
26. titans.....131
27. bucs.......145
28. lions......146
29. raiders....156
29. chiefs.....156
31. rams.......157
32. browns.....167


Category: General Sports
Related Forum: More Sports Board
Comments (52) | Add Comment
Posted by Jizzy08 on 10/27 at 3:22 p.m.

Pats were beat by the number 2 team and are above both the colts and saints who are undefeated. I dont get it.


Report Abuse
Posted by Kafka on 10/27 at 3:24 p.m.

I must admit that this is a very shitty list


Report Abuse
Posted by rondozombie on 10/27 at 3:26 p.m.

quote:

Pats were beat by the number 2 team and are above both the colts and saints who are undefeated. I dont get it.




Supa.....this appears like it will be the first response every week here.

Maybe we can make a markup similar to :babe: that people can post here.

It could be :GettingOld:

and it will appear like this:

"I cant believe you have team that just lost to another team above the team that just beat them ZOMG!"


Report Abuse
Posted by CosmoKramer on 10/27 at 3:27 p.m.

The bengals beat 3 of the teams listed ahead of them. Just for the record. And should have beaten a fourth.


Report Abuse
Posted by Night Man on 10/27 at 3:31 p.m.

These inane rankings posted as an official TD blog make the site look cheap IMO


Report Abuse
Posted by TigerinATL on 10/27 at 3:36 p.m.

quote:

They are bunched
up in groups right now. That's because the cream hasn't had
enough games to rise to the top yet.


Does he have a time frame on when his rankings will be worth a shit? What is the point of these rankings if it takes until the end of the season for them to be useful? Especially when he says they are reflective of the regular season only and worthless for the playoffs. Also especially when he says players like Peyton Manning have a tendency to make his rankings have even more holes than normal.

I bet an MSB human poll could just as easily come up with A B C and D groups.


Report Abuse
Posted by Lester Earl on 10/27 at 3:46 p.m.

each week i confirm that i cant take this dude seriously


Report Abuse
Posted by supatigah on 10/27 at 3:50 p.m.

I have to admit what cracks me up about this every week is how SUPER SERIOUS everyone seems to take this ranking

all he is doing is taking the team ranking in 6 overall stats categories and adding the rankings together to get a number

there is no won/loss component in the ranking but people start screaming about this team beat that team blah blah blah

WGAF? espn polls 4 people for their power ranking and I am convinced 3 of them are on drugs when they submit their polls
LINK


Report Abuse
Posted by SwampDonks on 10/27 at 3:50 p.m.

quote:

each week i confirm that i cant take this dude seriously


+1, and each week, he will try to defend his case without much luck


Report Abuse
Posted by SwampDonks on 10/27 at 3:52 p.m.

quote:

WGAF? espn polls 4 people for their power ranking and I am convinced 3 of them are on drugs when they submit their polls


Pretty well done IMO


Report Abuse
Posted by supatigah on 10/27 at 3:53 p.m.

quote:

each week i confirm that i cant take this dude seriously


LE do me a HUGE solid and remind me next time i force you to post in a thread to instead just tell you to frick off

and then we will both be happy


Report Abuse
Posted by SPEEDY on 10/27 at 3:55 p.m.



Report Abuse
Posted by Lester Earl on 10/27 at 3:55 p.m.

quote:

I have to admit what cracks me up about this every week is how SUPER SERIOUS everyone seems to take this ranking




quote:

LE do me a HUGE solid and remind me next time i force you to post in a thread to instead just tell you to frick off





funny


Report Abuse
Posted by LSUgrasshopper on 10/27 at 3:58 p.m.

quote:

These inane rankings posted as an official TD blog make the site look cheap IMO


+1


If for nothing else I can't think of any reason anyone should be below the rams.

This makes no sense on so many levels.


Report Abuse
Posted by supatigah on 10/27 at 4:03 p.m.

what is really funny is I quit posting the rankings because of people whining about them and rondo asked for them to come back on the help board

No one seems to be able to figure out week after week that it is just a stats ranking compilation, there is no human element to it whatsoever, the scores are not a factor because it is NOT A POLL. It is simply a compilation of how well you play in 6 categories and how that play ranks versus the rest of the league

THAT'S IT, there is nothing else to it but the monkeys on the MSB can't grasp the difference between a ranking and a poll so they just screech at anything and everything

Image Link


Report Abuse
Posted by TxTiger25 on 10/27 at 4:04 p.m.

quote:

I must admit that this is a very shitty list


This. But at least he got the Bengals right.


Report Abuse
Posted by LSU-MNCBABY on 10/27 at 4:04 p.m.

the thing i dont get is the favored thing, the saints would be favored over the broncos, the ravens ARE favored over the broncos.

No way the packers would be favored over the colts or steelers.

Just add me to the list of those who dont get it, any team that doesnt have the saints #1 seems off.


Report Abuse
Posted by supatigah on 10/27 at 4:05 p.m.

quote:

If for nothing else I can't think of any reason anyone should be below the rams.



probably because statistically the rams are not as bad offensively as the browns are but they are equally bad statistically on defense.

THAT


Report Abuse
Posted by rondozombie on 10/27 at 4:05 p.m.

Wait until we start flinging poo.


Report Abuse
Posted by TigerinATL on 10/27 at 4:06 p.m.

quote:

I have to admit what cracks me up about this every week is how SUPER SERIOUS everyone seems to take this ranking


You're the one giving it legitimacy by making it an official blog post. If this was just a thread started by any other poster he'd probably end up being ignored after he'd taken his lumps. And my comments weren't meant to be taken as SUPER SERIOUS, I just don't see why you liked it enough to bring it here in the first place. I don't think Buddy did a very good job of defending his system, in fact he pretty much admitted to all the flaws, pointed out a few more and said, "just wait til near the end of the season". What moron can't tell who the good and bad teams are by the end of the season?


Report Abuse
Posted by dukke v on 10/27 at 4:12 p.m.

quote:


1. pats........45
2. broncos.....48
3. saints......50
4. packers.....52
5. giants......55
6. colts.......57
7. steelers....62


Colts behind the Giants Pats and PACK?????


Report Abuse
Posted by lpd1975 on 10/27 at 4:13 p.m.

quote:

what is really funny is I quit posting the rankings because of people whining about them and rondo asked for them to come back on the help board


I use this ranking to help me with my survivior pic'em. I narrow it down to three and use this to determine my best choice. It's worked so far.


I also like to read these threads and how much you (Supa) get your panties in a wad over other posters getting their panties in wad. It makes decent comedy.


Report Abuse
Posted by rondozombie on 10/27 at 4:15 p.m.

Supa, if you want to just post the blog and not make a thread about it that would probably reduce the backlash.


Report Abuse
Posted by LSUgrasshopper on 10/27 at 4:33 p.m.

quote:

out week after week that it is just a stats ranking compilation, there is no human element to it whatsoever, the scores are not a factor because it is NOT A POLL


Except that a very dumb human picked which stats to look at and how to haphazardly assign a point value from 1 to 32 marginalizing how much better some teams are than others and over separating teams in the middle with similar numbers, then using that crappy evaluation system as a judgement to rank the teams from 1 to 32.

It's a poll, and it's not a good one.



Report Abuse
Posted by SwampDonks on 10/27 at 4:36 p.m.

Another thing I don't like about this blog is that he only picks the obvious games that anyone with a right mind would be able to pick but the games that could go either way, he stays away from.

Which in return is the main way his record of predicting games is so good.


Report Abuse
Comments (52)

Add a Comment
  
 |  


Back to top



Advertisement
Buddy's NFL Playbook Categories
Saints
General Sports