- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
INHERENT Contempt of Congress Charges Could Be Levied Against AG Garland Immediately
Posted on 5/17/24 at 10:04 am
Posted on 5/17/24 at 10:04 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
"Inherent contempt of Congress" =/= Contempt of Congress
Anna Paulina Luna's parliamentary maneuvering in her short time in Congress has been the stuff of legend.
Now, the question is - does Speaker Mike Johnson have the testicular fortitude to jail the Attorney General in one of the cells in the US Capitol dungeon level?
Cue the boo-birds and booger-picking nihilists who have nothing of substance to add to the conversation.
This post was edited on 5/17/24 at 10:05 am
Posted on 5/17/24 at 10:06 am to VoxDawg
Anyone willing to go out on a limb and say his arrest is imminent?
Posted on 5/17/24 at 10:10 am to VoxDawg
Do it, they have displayed the rules of the game they are willing to play. Game on!
Posted on 5/17/24 at 10:12 am to Datbawwwww
Every last one of those crooked fricks deserves to be held indefinitely under the Capitol. Give them the same medicine they've dished out to the J6 hostages.
This post was edited on 5/17/24 at 10:23 am
Posted on 5/17/24 at 10:14 am to VoxDawg
quote:
does Speaker Mike Johnson have the testicular fortitude
He'll have to check in with his pimp, Hakeem, first.
I asked Johnson, on X, if Hakeem makes him hold the inside of his pocket or just latch onto his jacket each day as he parades Johnson around the Capitol. Still waiting for that answer.
Posted on 5/17/24 at 10:15 am to VoxDawg
quote:
Now, the question is - does Speaker Mike Johnson have the testicular fortitude to jail the Attorney General in one of the cells in the US Capitol dungeon level?
Soyboy wont do a thing
Posted on 5/17/24 at 10:16 am to VoxDawg
Republicans are cuck cowards, Garland literally is trying to lock up your nominee after 3 years of saying there wasn’t a crime but cave to pressured and his department got caught tampering with evidence to take down a fomer president and nominee.
But arresting him for his crime when he set the standard no one is above the law is too far.
But arresting him for his crime when he set the standard no one is above the law is too far.
Posted on 5/17/24 at 10:16 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Anyone willing to go out on a limb and say his arrest is imminent?
Hell will freeze over before any DC male GOPer grows a spine
Posted on 5/17/24 at 10:18 am to Beauregard96
quote:
Nothing
Will
Happen
Posted on 5/17/24 at 10:18 am to VoxDawg
quote:
Could Be
Could be’s don’t make honey
Posted on 5/17/24 at 10:22 am to VoxDawg
Does it have to be the Speaker or can any member file an Inherent Contempt of Congress Charge? If so, turn her loose on the DOJ, including Holder!
Posted on 5/17/24 at 10:26 am to VoxDawg
quote:
does Speaker Mike Johnson have the testicular fortitude
Anyone want to break the news to him
Posted on 5/17/24 at 10:28 am to VoxDawg
The Dems will withdraw support from Johnson and he'll be gone within a weed if he even lends legitimacy to such an action. Dems own him; he's like tits on a boar hog, just there with no real useful purpose.
Posted on 5/17/24 at 10:28 am to VoxDawg
I hope her pregnancy didn't wreck that banging body of hers
Posted on 5/17/24 at 10:31 am to RCDfan1950
quote:
if he even lends legitimacy to such an action
It is completely legitimate with precedent.
This is a way to hold people accountable, which hasn't been done for over 70 years
Posted on 5/17/24 at 10:33 am to boosiebadazz
They will not and cannot.....I mean an idiot can try, but I would think that Garland or any cabinet level appointee would be protected by executive privilege and then there would no doubt be separation of powers considerations.
Posted on 5/17/24 at 10:35 am to VoxDawg
It's too bad republicans don't have the balls to do this, because democrats sure as hell do.
Posted on 5/17/24 at 10:45 am to ksayetiger
Totally agree, k...but if Johnson were to even acknowledge it, he'd then become the central figure re the action. And that would only paint him as a Dem enabler. He'll run from this like it is Ebola.
Posted on 5/17/24 at 10:47 am to KiwiHead
quote:
They will not and cannot.....I mean an idiot can try, but I would think that Garland or any cabinet level appointee would be protected by executive privilege and then there would no doubt be separation of powers considerations.
Stop, bruh. Anna Luna read the rules last night and Vox posted the video.
My cousin is in the Guard and said they’ve been called up due to likely unrest as Garland will be arrested.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News